BRI_APUSH_09_05_P02_Handout_B_Point-Counterpoint_Graphic_Organizer

.docx

School

University of Tampa *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

261

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ChefWolf1409 on coursehero.com

Handout B: Point-Counterpoint Graphic Organizer Vanessa Velazquez Period 1 10-17-23 Issue on the Table Claim A Were urban bosses corrupt politicians who manipulated the political system for their own control and gain, or were they providing essential services for immigrants and enabling the growth of cities despite corrupt means? Claim B Summarize this argument in one sentence, using your own words: Even though Urban bosses gained significant political power through non-democratic means, they still helped immigrants get a foothold in the political processes in America which will in turn improve their economic, social, and political placement. Select and record the sentence or sentences that best demonstrate the author’s argument: “Many historians simply focus on Tweed’s practice of “buying” votes or having immigrants commit voter fraud to explain his rise to power, but more commonly, he assisted immigrants with the naturalization process and ensured the victory of his machine in a way that also provided immigrants with longterm benefits.” Summarize this argument in one sentence, using your own words: Through the promises to grant benefits to their voters, the urban bosses took advantage of their political schemes and still left the community in disarray making the immigrants stuck in a cycle that keeps them subjugated. Select and record the sentence or sentences that best demonstrate the author’s argument: “ In the very neighborhoods that gave Tammany Hall’s machine its heaviest majorities, the garbage piled up so high in some streets that it blocked doorways. Cholera throve in urban drinking water, and tuberculosis found a home in every apartment building of the slums” Compare the two arguments. To what extent do these claims support or oppose each other? The argument in claim A surrounds the idea that even though the politicians greatly benefitted from their sneaky maneuvers, it was okay because the immigrants benefitted as well. Claim A supports the idea that the use of the political machine was beneficial because it gave the immigrants a political presence that would eventually grant them more power and identity in America. On the other hand, the argument in Claim B does not believe the effects of the political machine were great because the promises made by the politicians were not kept. Being that everyone was politically corrupt, they knew how to make connections to take
advantage of minorities. In the process, they gained the support of the people yet didn’t follow through on the steps to better the community. On the other hand, both arguments agree that the processes of the political machines were ones that tainted the democratic image of the United States as a whole. Which argument do you find more convincing? Explain what evidence led you to this point of view. I find argument B more convincing because I am aware of how easy it is to take advantage of the less fortunate when they have been promised the world. The inclusion of how this can be carried out, such as through criminals getting off the hook as long as they were politically connected, was a nice way of relaying how easily democratic lines can be crossed with the use of political machines. List at least two primary sources that would provide additional context to help you evaluate the arguments presented in this Point-Counterpoint. Stephanie Hinnershitz from Cleveland State University argues that urban bosses were providing essential services for immigrants and enabling the growth of cities despite corrupt means. Mark Summers from the University of Kentucky, on the other hand, argues that urban bosses were corrupt politicians who manipulated the political system for their own control and gain. The Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media provides a list of primary sources on urban political machines, including investigations of urban politics by famous muckrakers such as Lincoln Steffens2. Explain how this debate highlights how political machines thrived, in part, by providing immigrants and the poor with social services. This debate highlights how political machines thrived by providing social services because when immigrants and the poor- minorities- were granted with benefits, it seemed as though they were slowly climbing up the social latter. Therefore, they continued to support the politicians who made promises to improve their living situations- even though certain promises weren’t kept- and the political influence continue to spread.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help