BRI_APUSH_09_05_P02_Handout_B_Point-Counterpoint_Graphic_Organizer
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Tampa *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
261
Subject
Political Science
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by ChefWolf1409 on coursehero.com
Handout B: Point-Counterpoint Graphic Organizer
Vanessa Velazquez
Period 1
10-17-23
Issue on the Table
Claim A
Were urban bosses corrupt politicians who
manipulated the political system for their own
control and gain, or were they providing essential
services for immigrants and enabling the growth of
cities despite corrupt means?
Claim B
Summarize this argument in one sentence, using
your own words:
Even though Urban bosses gained
significant
political power through non-democratic
means,
they still helped immigrants get a
foothold in the
political processes in America which will
in turn
improve their economic, social, and
political
placement.
Select and record the sentence or sentences that
best demonstrate the author’s argument:
“Many historians simply focus on
Tweed’s practice of “buying” votes or
having immigrants commit voter fraud
to explain his rise to power, but more
commonly, he assisted immigrants with
the naturalization process and ensured
the victory of his machine in a way that
also provided immigrants with longterm
benefits.”
Summarize this argument in one sentence, using
your own words:
Through the promises to grant benefits
to their
voters, the urban bosses took
advantage of their
political schemes and still left the
community in
disarray making the immigrants stuck
in a cycle
that keeps them subjugated.
Select and record the sentence or sentences that
best demonstrate the author’s argument:
“ In the very neighborhoods that gave
Tammany Hall’s machine its heaviest
majorities, the garbage piled up so high
in some streets that it blocked
doorways. Cholera throve in urban
drinking water, and tuberculosis found a
home in every apartment building of
the slums”
Compare the two arguments. To what extent do these
claims support or oppose each other?
The argument in claim A surrounds the
idea that even
though the politicians greatly benefitted
from their
sneaky maneuvers, it was okay because
the
immigrants benefitted as well. Claim A
supports the
idea that the use of the political machine
was
beneficial because it gave the immigrants
a political
presence that would eventually grant them
more
power and identity in America. On the
other hand,
the argument in Claim B does not believe
the effects
of the political machine were great
because the
promises made by the politicians were not
kept.
Being that everyone was politically corrupt,
they
knew how to make connections to take
advantage of
minorities. In the process, they gained the
support of
the people yet didn’t follow through on the
steps to
better the community. On the other hand,
both
arguments agree that the processes of the
political
machines were ones that tainted the
democratic
image of the United States as a whole.
Which argument do you find more convincing? Explain what evidence led you to this point of view.
I find argument B more convincing because I am aware of how easy it is to take advantage of the less fortunate when they have
been promised the world. The
inclusion of how this can be carried out, such as through criminals getting off the hook as long as they were politically connected,
was a nice way of relaying how easily democratic lines can be crossed with the use of political machines.
List at least two primary sources that would provide additional context to help you evaluate the arguments presented in this Point-Counterpoint.
Stephanie Hinnershitz from Cleveland State University argues that urban bosses were providing essential services for immigrants
and enabling the growth of cities despite corrupt means. Mark Summers from the University of Kentucky, on the other hand,
argues that urban bosses were corrupt politicians who manipulated the political system for their own control and gain.
The Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media provides a list of primary sources on urban political machines, including
investigations of urban politics by famous muckrakers such as Lincoln Steffens2.
Explain how this debate highlights how political machines thrived, in part, by providing immigrants and the poor with social services.
This debate highlights how political machines thrived by providing social services because when immigrants and the poor-
minorities- were granted with benefits, it seemed as though they were slowly climbing up the social latter. Therefore, they
continued to support the politicians who made promises to improve their living situations- even though certain promises weren’t
kept- and the political influence continue to spread.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help