preview

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Anti-Transcendentalism

Better Essays

Murder, lying, stealing, cheating, who would make offenses such as these? Man is a walking conglomeration of evil and monstrosities that can be suppressed by a veil of good but will be ever-present. Anti-Transcendentalists believed such as this, that man ,innately, has a flawed moral compass that will always consider evil in a situation. They also believe that man has private relations, that man is isolated in life, and that man is the sole mechanism of his downfall. Many authors who were Anti-Transcendentalists used examples like these in there works as rhetoric to explain their beliefs. Rhetoric is the process by which an author explains his case on a particular subject to the reader using ethos, pathos, and logos in an attempt to persuade …show more content…

To comprehend this view, one must consider it as more of an apparatus that helps one address a situation than a theory. For example, a man walks into a store and goes to the produce department. He walks past the cucumbers and the tomatoes several times as he analyzes his prey for theft. At once, he gathers himself, selects a tomato and a cucumber, and makes a run for it. At this moment in the situation, one could view it in two ways. The man either stole the food because he was hungry and knew he could not afford it ,or, the man may have been plotting to steal the food because he had a malice towards the store and the produce section was the least guarded place. If one views the act as an act of desperation and good intentions, they would be practicing Transcendentalism. On the contrary, if one saw it as a malevolent theft, they would be practicing Anti-Transcendentalism. Although this prior situation seems very petty, it parallels the way that Anti-Transcendentalism came about. Transcendentalism was a movement that took place in the early 1800’s to the middle of that century. While many viewed humans as benevolent beings at heart, some viewed humans as beings of malice and contempt. People such as Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville wrote Anti-Transcendental pieces that contradicted the beliefs of the time-period. Edgar Allen Poe, although not a famous …show more content…

As mentioned in the prior paragraph, ethos and logos form the backbone of the implicit argument that Poe presents someone who is reading his story. Pathos should be viewed as more like muscle fibers in a body instead of the skeletal structure. The body needs the skeleton is be identifiable, but it too needs the muscles to give life to the bones. Similarly, Poe uses many sensory details in his work that give life to his works. The details can range from simple descriptions such as the intro sentence to Egaeus, but the details can also take on a more intricate

Get Access