preview

Analysis Of Alex Boyd's In Defense Of Graffiti

Decent Essays

Bosfield 1
Darlecia Bosfield
Professor McFeaters
ENC1101
10 October 2017
The Public Opinion and The Hidden Expressionist By definition, graffiti is illegal. It is also considered vandalism because public or private property is intentionally destroyed, but in Alex Boyd’s blog “In Defense of Graffiti”, he clearly conveys his argument about how graffiti shows qualities of value and shouldn’t be criticized on impulse. Even though many people have seen graffiti as something to be condoned, punishable, and terrorizing, it is actually just another form of expression, communication, art, and point of view. The younger generation doesn’t feel that they are being heard. There are so many things that young people go through and so much that they would like to speak about, but the older generation or the outside world brushes it aside. They don’t see their thoughts as something important or something worth their while. Graffiti seems like it is the go to tactic to express their selves because it is a free and rebellious way to get the attention of everyone. Boyd states that “anywhere attempts are made to smother freedom of speech, graffiti becomes an affordable, accessible method of communication (Boyd). The younger generation screams for the attention of the outside world just to listen to them for a moment, so when they go to extremes like graffiti, it is just their way of making sure they are being heard. Every color, stroke and spray is for a reason. For example, the

Get Access