Modern contexts have posed challenges to the world religions because they call for religions to adapts to shifting contexts while also maintaining continuity. Indeed, Buddhism serves as an important example about how adaptive religions have become in order to remain culturally relevant and meaningful during the twenty-first century. Asian Buddhism is often associated with specific national and ethnic groups, which often limns it as wholly separate from the West both linguistically as well as politically. Although the cultural and ethnic aspects of Buddhism have remained significant, the ability of Buddhism to speak to speak as a monolith is vital in its modern representation, influence, and legitimacy in the political and social arenas of …show more content…
The logic behind each set of moral codes have been deployed to argue for as well as against the "permissibility of abortion" through the historical as well as textual corpus of Buddhist principles (Hughes 185). Buddhist principles are thus vital for Buddhist ethicists who argue against the practice of abortion according to Buddhist mores. Indeed, one of the top five guiding principles in Buddhists is not to kill another human being, and some ethnic Buddhists view abortion as the intention killing of a human life. They invoke the syncretic belief that the "transmigration of consciousness occurs at conception, and therefore all abortion incurs the karmic burden of killing" despite the fact that prior to modern medicine developing in the West and Buddhist countries Buddhists relied on scientifically inaccurate ideas about when life began (185). Buddhism thus lacks canonical currency and relevant precepts to the issue of abortion from an ethical as well as scientific point of …show more content…
Indeed, Buddhist ethics have played a formative role in configuring these views, and the Japanese have grafted religious ideas into the discussion regarding abortion despite the fact that many decry the "commercialization of abortion" which has fetishized "the fetus as an omnipresent menace" (Harrison 98). More interestingly, abortion did not become a politically divisive issue in Japan and other Buddhist Asian countries in the same way that it did in the West as a result of social pragmatism (LaFleur). The practice of Mizuklo Kuzo, or memorial services given to aborted fetuses, underscores these idiosyncrasies. Ultimately, abortion has not polarized modern Japan, and Japanese Buddhists have articulated a religious view of abortion that embraces the termination of a fetus even though Buddhist epistemologies are saturated with the notion that killing is inherently wrong (1). As such, Buddhism, despite its heterogeneity, has emerged as the only major religion that articulates an enlightened, pragmatic, and sensible view of
Abortion in many Buddhist positions appears to be justifiable when it conflicts with bodily autonomy or maintain the idea that a foetus is closer in status to a small or undeveloped animal. Although most views conflict with the first Buddhist precept of not bringing harm to sentient beings, living humans seem to be the most important when considering this and preference is given to the mother of a foetus as well as a foetus not being fully recognised as a human being by some Buddhist variants. Abortion in a Buddhists view however, is seen as a last resort by all variants.
Among all the issues that have been fought for or against in the United States, abortion may be one of the most popular issues that Americans are passionate about. Abortion is defined as the removal of the embryo or fetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy. Thousands of abortions take place every single day, and yet public opinion remains at a standstill as to whether or not abortion is ethical. Everyone holds different opinions on abortion. The proponents believe that it is the women’s private right to determine the future of the baby in her body. On the other hand, the opponents think a woman does not have the right to decide whether the person that she gives birth should live or die. They believe that life begins at conception. In fact, a person’s stance on the issue is often determined by how he views the fetus: a part of the mother’s body or as a human being. I am an opponent, and I believe abortion is murder. Also, abortion should not be legal because it harms women’s health, affects intimate relationship, and women do not have the right to decide the baby’s right to live or die.
Abortion is the deliberate killing of the weakest and most defenseless among us. A pregnant woman has the right to decide whether her baby should live or die. But what about the unborn baby? Doesn’t it get a say? Doesn’t its life cost anything? According to the first amendment of the constitution, we have the freedom of speech. So why not give the speechless fetus a chance to come into the world? If the reason for an abortion is not having enough money or wanting to live a free life, then there are many organizations that can help children that have no support from their family. In this paper, I will defend the view that having an abortion is morally wrong.
In the United States, per year, twenty million unsafe abortions and sixty-eight thousand deaths from them occur, (Odyssey) while the average death risk for a safe abortion is less than .01 percent. An illegal and unsafe abortion should never result as the last resort, but it tends to because of a lack of access to safe ones. Morals, usually drawn from religious beliefs, tend to play a part in one’s opinion towards abortion. More than three fourths of Americans consider themselves as Christians. This means that more than three fourths of Americans believe that it is morally wrong to undergo an abortion and a person should not hold the right to take someone else’s life away. While a moral belief, based on religion, is something all people are free to have,
Abortion has been a major controversial issue for decades not only within the United States but around the world. I wanted to compare the beliefs of major world religions and American laws on abortion and see if there are any shared beliefs or where the belief systems or laws contrast the most. Abortion means the act of termination of pregnancy. The act is succeeded or accompanied by the death of the embryo or the developed fetus. Jewish, Muslim and Catholic at some degree defines abortion in the same line. However, in details the whole thing tends to differ. The whole discussion is full of contradictions since these three major world religions, to some extent, differs with the American view and laws on abortion. As abortion puts a new coating as a political alarm in the trending USA elections, Jewish approach and view to the whole issue is worthwhile to be discussed.
Induced abortion is the deliberate ending of a pregnancy before the fetus is viable or capable of surviving outside a female’s body. Abortion has been practiced in every culture since the beginning of civilization” (Kaplan, Tischauser & Chara, 2015). Abortion is one of many controversial issues. It is a topic that is widely debated among many people. Abortion is a difficult topic of discussion, when the baby is a product or rape, or has Down syndrome or deformities. According to my Christian worldview, I will examine the abortion ethical dilemma, and compare it to other options of resolving the dilemma.
It is quite clear from a variety of sources that abortion has been severely disapproved of in the Buddhist tradition. It is also equally clear that abortion has been tolerated in Buddhist Japan and accommodated under exceptional circumstances by some modern Buddhists in the U.S. The situation is similar to that of Roman Catholicism, where abortion, though disapproved of in the strongest terms by Church authorities, is still practiced by a large number of devoted Catholics and defended by at least a few.
Albert Einstein once said, “the religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend a personal god, avoid dogmas and theology. Covering both the natural and spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all natural and spiritual and a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that would cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.”# Many great minds like Albert Einstein have converted or become Buddhists. Many people from the west are turning their attention towards Buddhism because of the Buddha’s simple way to life and the lack of worship or prayer to a divine being.
There are many different religions with many different beliefs, traditions, practices, and rituals. These differences are a very important part of understanding and appreciating the culture and history behind the specific religion. However, the practices that certain religions have in common can aid even more in furthering the understanding of specific beliefs of other religions. Since most religions cultivate from the practices and beliefs of other religions, they use those core values and beliefs and transform them into what they believe is a better way practicing. Religions use similarities within each other and twist them into their own. There are certain beliefs within every religion that shape their practices such as their morals or their most essential or absolute value, their position on human beings’ problems and solutions, and their view on life and death within their religion. Pure Land Buddhism (a form of Mahayana Buddhism) and Vaishnavites (a group within Hinduism) are great examples of this very concept.
Abortion is a highly debated topic in today’s society, but many do not know about it’s origins. An abortion is defined as ”The intentional termination of a pregnancy after conception.” Over the course of this paper I will shows the pre-modern world, and the brutal methods of abortion they had during that time, abortion around the world, the Greek and Roman world and Japan, and the early attitude of abortion, it was “double edge sword” because women were shunned for having an abortion, but also shunned for having a child out of wedlock.
Buddhism is a philosophy or a way of understanding the self and the universe. As a consequence of this, there are no moral imperatives. Significant person studied is the Dalai lama, he has a significant impact towards the Buddhist community. Buddhist ethical teachings on abortion and euthanasia also have another significance for Buddhists. The 14th Dalai Lama was born July 6th, Taktser, China. He has devoted his whole life committed for the good of society. Due to the nature of the five precepts, abortion is generally discouraged in Buddhism because of the ability for it to be interred. Euthanasia, more formally, it is the killing of those who are incurably ill and in great pain or distress, where the killing is done in order to spare them
From the observations, the researchers have found that most of the Buddhists have a similarity in culture that is the concerning or focusing issue and helps to make difference from others religions. The cultural education behavior may vary from but they are not varying. Nevertheless, culture of Buddhists in India may vary from other countries (Ramya, 2016). The interaction among them or their own cast is always better and supportive. With religious views, people earn quality of moral and a sense of peaceful life and all Buddhists may work together. In accordance with religious faith, they cooperate with one another. In India, their cooperation is performed through many cultural
The world’s fastest growing religion and the 4th largest religion in terms of the followers,
Since people were born in Japan, they have always lived with goods and events related to Buddhism, but they have not realized the existence of them. Regarding the worldwide view, there are many customs, rituals, foods, and culture all over the world. Japan also has religion, but some people say that Japan has no clear religion when they argue about that. However, is it true? In fact, Buddhism has close relationships with Japanese lives. There are three reasons why Japanese people are religious are rooted in Buddhism.
In this paper mainly based on my own multicultural and multi religious background, I will suggest that religious pluralism cannot be considered as a new concept in the context of Asia. Rather, it is a ‘lived experience’ of Asian people. More specifically, as a Catholic born in a Catholic family, brought up in a predominantly Buddhist culture and having worked hand in hand with Moslems and Hindus, I perceive religious pluralism as an existential reality. Buddhism being the major religion of Sri Lanka, I will focus my reflection mainly on Buddhist Christian dialogue.