preview

Autonomy Vs Contract

Decent Essays

In a society where there is diversity in terms of social functions, personal beliefs, professional skills, and socioeconomic backgrounds, etc., and where individuals act out their unique personalities with a high degree of autonomy, mutual relationship are largely regulated through contracts. Due to the prevailing differences, there hardly exists a set of concrete social norms grounded in identical values that regulates the details of social interactions and constrains individual actions. Rather, contracts set binding limits on the duties and obligations both at the present and in the future for individuals reaching mutual agreements. The binding nature of contracts specifies certain conditions that limit the autonomy of individual choices and hence establish order in social interactions. A contract is valid if it is the outcome of certain due procedures, but what makes the procedures valid, however, is the underlying …show more content…

Therefore, only the external force of social order contains some aspects of desire. In addition, the norm itself restricts choices if they impede the formation of social relationships healthy to the development of the community in particular social structures, namely, if the values under certain social structures do not allow the flexibility to generate new procedures or to improve the current ones. Substantive law based on authoritarian values is an example. On the contrary, normative control opens up opportunities if it allows for flexible procedures in accordance with the realization of individual potential and the development of healthy social relationships, and if it leaves room for adaption of the procedures to changes in social structures. Rational legal order is an

Get Access