Behavioral Theories of Leadership

Leadership is complex and, comprises of many definitions and qualities (Grimm 2010). One definition of leadership is ‘a multifaceted process of identifying a goal, motivating other people to act, and providing support and motivation to achieve mutually negotiated goals’ (porter-O’Grady 2003). Back in 1939 Kurt Lewin researched to identify different styles of leadership. According to his research, there are three major styles of leadership. Authoritarian or autocratic, participative or democratic and delegative or laizzes-fair. These three styles remain influential today. According to educational leaders.govt.NZ, leadership is about empowering, transforming and working together to meet schools and 21st century (www.tki).There are many leadership theories and from leadership theories comes leadership styles. the educational leadership model according to www.educational leaders.govt.nz identifies four qualities that build a leader 's capability to enhance teaching and learning outcomes for the school: manaakitangi- leading with moral purpose, pono- having self-belief, ako- being a learner, awhinatanga -guiding and supporting.

When developing a template to assess which leadership styles are best suited to mitigate the effects of a decline in financial compensation, it is imperative to understand leadership theory. One of the first pioneers in leadership theory was Kurt Lewin. Kurt Lewin (1890–1947), was a prominent figure in psychology in his generation. He provided a solid foundation to the teachings of organizational development. In many circles he was known as the father of organizational development. He was best known for the development of field theory. Field theory was essential because it allowed business professionals to understand why undesirable behaviors was produced. It also taught how to bring about desirable behaviors. Field theory was developed in part because Lewin wanted to address organizational employee turnover.

The following paper outlines the comparison and contrast of four leadership models and theories. The purpose of this paper is to acquaint readers with the basic concepts underlying each model and theory. A review of the scholarly studies on leadership shows that there is a wide variety of different theoretical approaches to explain the complexities of the leadership process (e.g., Bass, 1990; Bryman, 1992; Gardner, 1990; Hickman 1998; Rost, 1991). Some researchers conceptualize as a trait, or as behavior, while others view leadership from a political perspective, or from a humanistic viewpoint.

The leadership models/theories that will be demonstrated are skills-based leadership, situational leadership, and leader-member exchange theory.

This theory makes the managers realize their strengths and weaknesses and they can also get an understanding of how to develop their leadership qualities

The television show Better Off Ted shows many great examples of the behavioral approach. It shows how Blake and Mouton’s leadership grid can be used to assess different leaders, it conveys what maternalism/paternalism can look like, how people use opportunism, and the strengths and weaknesses of the behavioral approach, The University of Michigan identified two different types of leadership behaviors: employee orientation and production orientation. Employee orientation is when a worker has strong human skills with their co-worker and values others that work with them. Production orientation is when someone only cares about the work that is getting accomplished.

To ensure leadership effective, several leadership theories are put forward and are adopted by different organizations. Some widely accepted theories include Trait Approach, Style Approach, Situational Approach, New Leadership Approach and Post-charismatic & Post-transformational (Western, 2013). Beyond doubt, they have their pros and cons, and they could play their role to guarantee the effectiveness of leadership as long as they are applied in an appropriate condition.

Though the theories of leadership glorify factors, such as personal significance, timing, special skills, responsiveness, or power, as the qualities of a leader, I believe that neither of those factors are as essential as being personable. I believe being personable is the greatest determinant since a leadership position requires public speaking, either in the form of one-to-one conversations or to an audience. I believe that a leader should create an impression that will motivate and inspire others. Therefore, they should be able to create an impressive and enduring impression. Leaders should speak to others in a way that is respectful, friendly, and relatable. If they are unable to do so, then no matter how powerful or significant the individual, not a single person will follow, admire, or respect them.

The very essence of this theory is the leaders should change their decisions and responses according to the situation. This means that one common approach is not ideal for all situations. Now a day the management follows Current leadership theories. Those are interactional theory and transformational theory. Interactional theory relay upon the decision making ability of the leader and the situation of the case. The People in itself are complex in nature and their motives are changing from time to time. The leadership exchange or delegation of authority and responsibility involves a lot of variables such as personality, perceptions, and the skills and abilities of leader and the employee, as well as the probable changes in a specific situation. In Transformational leadership, it raises each person to a greater level of morality and motivation. The basic of this theory is Vision and environment. What the Transformational leaders do is to forecast the path of the upcoming events and guide others to attain this with a greater standard of performance.

The Style theory focuses on what the leaders do to keep good relationships in the work environment. The positive behaviors that the leader present at the time of building relationships with others, will allow them to peruse effective relationships. At the same time, the style theory states that people have their own way of learning and it is better achieve in different ways.

The topic of leadership is historically one of the most widely researched when it comes to explorations of organizational behavior. The success of any institution or organization is pegged on the quality of its leadership because it is the determining factor on the pattern and speed at which it achieves its growth goals. Leaders are responsible for steering an organization toward its goal by mobilizing resources (both human and material) and maximizing their efficiency. The key deliverables for many leaders include employee well-being, teamwork, adherence to organizational processes and procedures, innovation, crisis

. I need to think twice when addressing a situation based on what our analyst do. Behavioral leadership practices focus on our ability to leverage our own behaviors and recognize those driving our employees and work force from the management perspective (Wienclaw, 2015). I feel it is in this area that I am well suited as a mid-level manager as I am always trying to lead by example and exhibit the behaviors I would like to see from my team members. There is a saying in the Air Force that “Noncommissioned Officers never have a bad day” and it is this mindset that ensures we are always striving to demonstrate a positive attitude no matter how difficult or trying the situation we are facing may appear. I was recently tasked to complete a behavioral

Chapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn 't always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tend to practice those principles most of the time and I assume these are theories that I truly tend to continue in a long run.

Leadership is an often misunderstood concept. Many people confuse management and leadership, classifying them as being the same. While a leader can be a manager and a manager can be a leader, they are often two separate things. There are four main components of leadership that we will discuss and there are many different ways to view and examine leadership with theory and maxim being the main methods.

A large amount of credit is given to Bass 's transformational leadership theory identifies four aspects of