preview

Case Analysis : Goodyear Tire And Rubber Company

Better Essays

Case Analysis: Case Studies: Goodyear
As of the past 3 decades, women have shown a commendable progress in the workplace. For instance, the average weekly earnings for women was 62.1 % that of men in the year 1970. The raw pay difference decreased from 37.9 % to 21.5 % by the year 2007. Despite the progress, the raw wage difference has continually been used to further public policy agendas without offering an explanation behind the difference (An Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages between Men and Women, 2009). This essay discusses a case of Ledbetter vs the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company where Lilly Ledbetter, the only female production supervisor at Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company’s plant in Gadsent, had worked for over …show more content…

It is true that Ledbetter never succeeded with the case, the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company went against the utilitarian theory when they made the choice to underpay her. First, whether an act is wrong or right depending on the consequences of the act. Second, whether an act is good or bad depends on facts about welfare. Third, the sources of value in the world are found in individuals such as people and animals. Fourth, the value of a state of affairs is obtained by getting the average of the values associated with the persons in that state of affairs. Finally, the value of a state of affairs is desired to be as great as possible (Eggleston, 2012). The company should also have considered the consequences that followed the act of discrimination against Ledbetter. This discriminatory act brought more unhappiness than happiness in the sense that it had to have negatively affected the morale of female employees who were working for the company, the emotions of their families, consumers, the stock-holders, and even some of the male employees, thus affecting productivity. This shows that the Company cannot be justified for the discriminatory act against Ledbetter.
Gender discrimination might increase inequality at the work place. Ledbetter claimed that she was consistently given poor assessments at work by her supervisors and that is why after so many years of hard work she was still earning far less

Get Access