preview

Compare And Contrast Louis Szilard And Eugene Vignat

Decent Essays

Driving down the road, Louis Szilard and Eugene Vignat were Hungarian scientists on a mission to convince one of the top scientists to join their cause. It was this conversation that lead to the end of the war in the Pacific and the death of over 100,000 people. This trip was the eve of World War II in the summer of 1939 and they were searching for Albert Einstein. A prominent figure in the science community, Einstein held a platform that other physics did not; one that allowed him access to political leaders. The Hungarian scientists believed that the Nazi’s were working on their potential weapon so they proposed that they develop a bomb for the American. However, they needed Einstein to back up that claim. Louis Szilard had a working theory that a nuclear chain reaction was possible and that it could atomically weaponize a bomb. This scientific discovery was based in the roots on Einstein’s earlier work—E = mc2. The process of the chain reaction relied on the discovery that the atom could be split if the nucleus was hit with another particle. Szilard wanted to harness this energy and …show more content…

Heavy water can be used as a moderator for bombs. However, the American bomb project was barely off the ground because the country wasn’t at war yet. The day after Pearl Harbor, the race for the bomb took the highest urgency. In the fall of 1942, the Americans hoped to witness a control nuclear reaction and in November the nuclear reactor was nearly complete. It wasn’t until December that the tests revealed that the chain reaction was self-sustaining and the bomb was possible. Scientists were horrified with their work and in a last ditch effort, a third Einstein letter was written to plead for the bomb never to be used, but it was too late. On July 16, 1945, the US was successful in detonating a nuclear weapon in the New Mexico desert—it was a transformative moment both for science and war

Get Access