Compensation Management

“Compensation represents both the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards employees receive for performing their jobs.” Martocchio, J.J. (2013) A Human Resource Management Approach. Compensation as most know is the hourly or annually paid. Compensation consist more of just hourly or annually pay. Organizations create monetary compensation process to reward their employees for their job performance. Monetary compensation is the core of

Individual incentive pay plans reward employees for meeting one or a combination of performance standards (e.g. productivity, safety, or attendance) set by the employer (Martocchio. 2013). Piece- rate pay is one of four individual incentive plans offered in the employment industry. Employers have two options to select from when choosing this incentive plan. The first option is compensating the employee hourly for each piece over the given production number. The second option is compensating employees based on established subjective (quality) and objective (quantity) performance standards. In both options the employee is, essentially, being compensated for the work he or she does and not what could have been completed (Gibbons. 1987).  Motivation,

The right compensation program will depend on the organization’s business strategy and goals. To achieve these, an organization must recruit and select the best possible employees. To attract such employees, there must be an attractive compensation plan. Competitors will be offering different payment options, this may be based on pay rate or special perks, and a company’s stock options. Organizations must be aggressive yet reasonable to compete with competitors. Retaining and encouraging employees to perform at their best may be achieved through an immediate incentive award

With the constant change in today’s business world, to have a competitive advantage makes it difficult for employers to attract and retain the most talented employees. Identifying the company’s compensation strategy ensures the organization offers the right pay and manages the pay increases to retain top talents. When we hear the word compensation we think about compensating an employee for their work performed, but there

A well-articulated compensation philosophy drives organizational success by aligning pay and other rewards with business strategy. It provides the foundation for plan design and administration and anchors current and future plans to the company's culture and values (Kaplan, 2006, p.32). Recognizing and rewarding achievement is the cornerstone of the company A’s compensation philosophy. The mission of the company is to attract, select, place and promote all individuals based on their qualifications. The company believes that performance-based compensation helps attract, develop and retain talented professionals. In addition to base pay which based upon local market conditions and targeted to be above market, the company provides the following types of potential compensation to reward performance:

This paper will examine setting the stage for strategic compensation and bases for pay. There are three main goals of compensation departments: internal consistency, market competitiveness, and recognition of individual contributions. Internally consistent compensation systems define the relative value of each job among all jobs within a company. (Martocchio, pg. 22, 2011) With this system companies want employees to be paid more based on their qualifications and responsibilities. They believe someone with less experience should be paid differently. To determine such evaluation companies use job analysis in order to provide job descriptions. The job evaluation is to determine pay according to a particular position. Market-competitive

Compensation is defined as all forms of financial returns and tangible benefits that employees receive as part of an employment relationship. Thus, in order to achieve, create, and maintain an effective compensation program you must explore greater professional expertise, organizational understanding, creativity, and vision (Bernardin & Russell, 2013).

Depending on how employees are rewarded for their work, there are four different incentive systems: personal pay, skill pay, bonus based pay, and profit sharing. Of these, PwC PSP utilizes a bonus based pay, which focuses on individual results. Processes, not outcomes, are the important factor. (Burton, et al, 2011)

O’Neil (1998) suggests six minimal criteria for the design of a performance based pay system. The first of these criteria is that the reward system should be self-funding, that is, the performance increases should as a minimum offset the cost of the rewards provided. The second criterion is that the distribution of the rewards must be consistent, fair and justifiable. In addition reward plans must be transparent and clearly communicated. The third criterion

Incentive based compensation plans are one of the most conversed topics organizations that have been dealing with for quite some time. There have been several philosophies, formulas, and plans used but in the end, each type of plan has created unfavorable and optimistic results. The questions have always been whether the positive that comes from incentives plans are worth the challenges they create. In examining some of the plans that offer individuals, team based, and long-term incentives, they all vary in different ways that they are applicable, administered and designed, and beneficial to the organization’s objectives.

Rewarding employees with bonuses for a job well done is one of the more popular ways of streamlining the payroll budget. As an employer you tie several stipulations to the employees’ job duties for them to obtain in order to receive the bonus. Bonus structures are no longer as popular as they were during the boom years, however, some employers still employ the idea and the performance of their employees proves that it still works. Although bonus plans have begun to disappear, the increased performance of individual employees through the rewarding of set goals has allowed bonus structures to withstand the test of time in the workplace. A structured bonus plan is a great way of rewarding those employees that are producers without killing a company’s budget. Implementing a sound bonus plan is a great way to encourage performance as long as the employee’s goals are attainable. Be careful however because a simple bonus plan to motivate employee’s performance can also be demotivating due to employee’s inability to attain the set goal. Implementing a ratio significantly outside of what is normal for the industry

Organizations provide incentive plans to employees as motivation to reach the objectives and goals of the company. Incentives are given to personnel to encourage them to do his or her best. Incentive plans in any business might include bonuses or raises, stock option plans, or other forms of incentives. This is in exchange for the employees who work harder, better, or faster in accordance with the organizations goals and objectives (Businesstown.com, 2001). The majority of incentives are performance-based policies in which workers receive additional cash or benefits centered on a worker’s performance.

One example of individual incentive is an individual bonus. An individual bonus occurs when an employee meets the criteria of their company to bring in a certain amount of customers (Noe 402). This will lead to payment based on how many customers were brought in. For instance, if an employee were advertising and brought in 100 customers, they will receive a higher bonus compared to someone

Although research generally confirms that pay-for-performance plans can influence greater outcomes, it is unclear how effective different pay plans are relative to each other (Park, 2012). Like most things in business, compensation is something that requires evaluation, study, assessment, strategy, modeling and integration.  Achieving a pay for performance culture does not happen without paying attention to the behaviors, activities, rewards and motivations that have to be linked and reinforced through a well engineered and successfully executed process.  Actually if that process does not tie rewards to shareholder financial objectives, employ the proper mix of compensation elements, result in meaningful dollars, embrace performance that employees can impact and are effectively communicated and reinforced, then the results it produces will likely fall short (Vision Link Advisory Group, 2013).

An incentive pay program can reward employees who continue to produce superior work or encourage employees who already produce good work to best. Sometimes, use an incentive system when employees are lack of enthusiasm of getting down to work and improving things. If everyone in the same job classification gets the same pay, there is no real incentive to do an outstanding job (French, 1990). Various incentive plans used to motivate all employees such as production staff, sales staff, administrative staff and managerial and professional staff on an individual basis. To be improved employee work performance, the incentive pay programs need to be fairly matched with the employees’ expectation. Properly designed and maintained incentive pay program has the potential to increase employees’ productivity and work performance.