As corporate cost is the cost associate with Treasury cost, Human resource management cost. Acitivity based costing seeks to identify cost drivers that are directly link all the activities e.g. support activities and production activities to the product manufactured or service provided. The cost of all those activities are assigned to products or services via the activity cost driver, according to the each product relative consumption of these activities. Allocating corporate overheads based on the use of volume related cost driver alone can produce the misleading cost information such as inappropriate allocation can lead to faulty conclusions about the relative product profitability.
Whether corporate costs should be allocated to individual divisions when an business has more than one division that depends on whether the corporate costs are incurred primarily to support divisions business activities and whether the allocation can be reliably determined. For example, if the divisional companies are not closely related to the corporate costs and similarly the corporate costs are not necessarily incurred to facilitate the operation of each division then arguably the corporate costs should not be allocated to divisions.
The allocation division also depends on the nature and type of the business, the purpose of the corporate costs allocation process and how divisions are divided. For example, if the change of corporate cost is in proportionate with the increase or decrease of
How did you measure the cost of debt for each division? Should the debt cost differ across divisions? Why?
Overhead costs are not in proportion to the production output because of the method they are using. This leads to inaccurate pricing and costing decisions. An Activity Based Costing System would help find the real relationship between the products produced and overhead.
When firms enter new markets or businesses, the way they structure these new businesses can result in greater complexity and less transparency. For instance, a firm that keeps each business separate will be easier to value than one that squeezes all the businesses into a single entity.
Question 1: Identify whether the analysis of expenses in profit or loss is presented by nature or function.
Under a traditional system, overhead cost is allocated to an activity based on hours or rates for direct labor or machine usage. However, this approach does not clearly indicate how much overhead cost will be needed in order to complete a job through a particular function. ABC methodology is to be used as an alternative to traditional accounting where a business 's overhead costs (indirect costs such as electrical energy consumption for heating or cooling, or indirect cost associated with marketing) are allocated as a proportion of direct costs, to an activity. This approach is unsatisfactory because there can be cases where two activities could absorb the same direct costs
On the off chance that my family would be wise to information and comprehension of how costs set, I think we would have had more certainty when we expanded costs since ourselves would have known our clients were getting esteem and the confirmation that we were all the while going to make a benefit. Seeing how the cost of merchandise and administrations are land at, and the various types of costs included is essential in the touching base at the right price for productivity and also arranging and setting objectives for what's to come. I likewise came to value that a loss article can be any part of a firm, whether it be an administration, item or process and costs must be assigned to cost questions suitably to keep away from perplexity for chiefs. Administrators must have a sound learning and comprehension of the various types of expenses and the ways outputs are apportioned to items since it can be mind boggling and subject to the sort of business and kind of cost article included. Amid the section, I went over the inquiry "By what means may number make reality, instead of "just" reflect
Number of skus was considered driver for Technical Support. The product weight was considered driver of resource consumption only for General & Administrative costs. Moreover, materials and direct labor were allocated based on the bill of materials and routings (exactly the way they were allocated in Standard Costing system). Finally, Material Handling & Setup, Order Processing and Production Planning were driven to products using number of orders. Consequently, ABC solves the major issue regarding the Standard Costing system: the assumption that all overhead costs can be included into one cost pool. All the drivers are summarized in exhibit 3. Exhibits 4 and 5 present respectively the ABC drivers and allocation rates.
a. Empire Company Limited used different function to classify their expenses as they presented their expenses separately from other functions such as cost of sales, selling and administrative expenses and finance costs (Empire Company Limited ).
Cost allocation is a very crucial procedure for many companies- not just production companies, but also in companies that provide service. Cost allocation has one purpose and that is to enable the determination of the cost of a product per unit in production companies and the cost of a provided service in service companies. Therefore, methods for cost allocation directly affect the service or product profitability assessment and at the same time sway segment and company profitability. The main problem is the choice of the cost allocation accounting approach. There are certain methods for cost allocation that do not apply the same to every company. If the method for
The cost of OS-367 may have increased under the ABC system due to the fact that it the cost of the product needed to be increased to cover all the overhead costs. Activity based costing allocates costs to different areas based on the actual product and service in relation to consumption. Traditional cost allocation allows the company to divide the costs by department and utilizes volume- based information to determine the allocations. Therefore, OS-367 may be the only product that needs a certain machine to be produced and the cost of that machine would be allocated to this certain product. In this scenario, it increased the overhead costs and total cost allocated (ABC), thus the cost per unit needed to be increased. The increase in cost per
3. Industry Cost Structure Based on an analysis of the industry and a review of the financial statements of the key companies competing in it, the following cost structure analysis has been created. The Financial Services Cost Structure Analysis is shown in Figure 1.
An organization costing system is a system that helps the management with the strategy planning while the system plays an important role in providing accurate cost information about the products and customers (Curtin, 2006). UPS utilizes the Activity-Based Costing (ABC) system. ABC assumes that activities cause costs and that cost objects create the demand for activities (Marx,
Nowadays, we know that activity based costing system assigns overhead costs to products or services products that using a two-stage process, which focuses on activities. ABC is a relatively new and very important topic in managerial accounting. ABC allows us to find a way that we could determine the profitability of every product, profitability of every customer we serve, and the profitability of our process. Contents in brief, first that comparing potential advantages of ABC versus traditional costing methods. The
The company should consider whether the transfer pricing method has simplicity and transparency, which provide objective performance measurements for division managers. With regard to simplicity and transparency, it is best for the company to set market-based transfer pricing because this is more objective than cost-based transfer pricing. In particular, when companies use cost-based transfer pricing, it is difficult to evaluate division performance unless the transfer prices exceed full costs.
ABC refers to cost attribution to cost units on the basis of benefit received from indirect activities e.g. material ordering, material handling, machine setups, quality assuring, customer support services etc. For each such activity, it is necessary to identify a cost driver that causes incurrence of cost relating to that activity. For example, hours spent on testing for a quality assurance activity may be used as application base of cost driver for this activity.