preview

Erikson's Theory: Identity Vs. Role Confusion

Better Essays

“What is a purposeful life?” Notable psychologist, Erik Erikson, developed a theory of psychosocial development explaining why humans ask this question in the fifth stage of his theory: Identity vs. Role Confusion (age 12-18 years old). During this stagedescribed as emotional and filled with I cannot count how many times I have asked myself this question. It is a commonly asked question among people of all ages and of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. It is also a fundamental enduring question of humanity that seeks to understand the purpose of our existence. I heard this question far too often in my senior year of High School as my classmates and I prepared to start our young lives in society. I asked myself this question because I felt an …show more content…

Working for the sake of yourself is looking after your personal well-being. Taking care of your health, financial stability, family, or schooling, are some of the many ways one can do to take care of their well-being and be happy. To work for the sake of others is to have the compassion to help and care for others. Some may question whether one could just live a life working for the sake of oneself or live working for the sake of others, only. The answer is no. Lao-Tzu’s second verse of Tao Te Ching describes the co-dependence of opposites, saying that “All the world knows beauty but if that becomes beautiful this becomes ugly…” If a person were to live their life working wholly for the sake of others, they become arrogant-minded because they put caring for people above themselves. The arrogance stems from the lack of respect and care they put on themselves. If a person were to live a life working wholly for their own sake, would become blinded and desensitize to other people’s feelings and even become accustomed to using people for their own benefit, creating hostile relationships with people. An important aspect of taking care of both your own well-being and for others is to work with a selfless attitude, non-attachment. In the Eastern text, Bhagavad Gita, states: “They who work selfishly for results are miserable.” (41) An example to further explain this idea, consider two authors, Writer One who writes for fame and be awarded Pulitzer Prizes, whereas Writer Two, writes to inspire and move the hearts of people through writing. Their profession is the same, but their attitudes and motivation to write is completely different. One is attached to awards and the other is not. Writer One who is attached to the award will be miserable if an award is not presented for their book. If Writer Two, who is not attached to the reward does not receive an award for their book, Writer Two will be unmoved

Get Access