Retail sales taxes are one of the best ways to collect tax revenue. If the tax rates are high in one state, then a consumer can shop online to avoid excessive sales taxes in another state. This is why many states are pushing Congress to adopt legislation to make all online retailers pay sales-tax regardless of their state of operation. Sales taxes through internet transactions have become a hot topic in the political arena, and there are plenty of politicians who are in agreement of collecting taxes from the internet including Alabama. Economically there are some states that are losing a great deal of tax revenue because certain businesses that are out-of-state are not required to collect sales-tax. According to William T. Lundeen and Tracy D. Williams (2002), “Congress cannot alter the protections provided by the Due Process Clause” (p. 18). Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled on this issue in 1992, saying that out-of-state tax collectors cannot force retailers to pay taxes. …show more content…
If Congress passes a new bill, then some small businesses will have to understand and comply with an entirely different tax jurisdiction in the United States. There are some states that do not collect state income taxes who believed if Congress permits a new bill forcing businesses to collect taxes that it would be violating their Constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which imposes a restriction that no out-of-state companies are required to pay tax to a state without due process. According to Veronique De Rugy (2002), “Utah Republican Gov. Mike Leavitt, a key leader in the states’ effort, says, that it will dramatically improve the morass that currently exists” (p. 10). Consequently, there are forty two states that are in support of Governor Mike Leavitt requesting Congress to pass legislation to compel all companies to collect taxes on the
-The state government would impact my business’s profit because we have to pay taxes for what we sell.
Many companies and businesses have already left California to escape high corporate income taxes. They've relocated to states without income tax, where they can save up to 13% more of their income. The seven U.S. states with no income tax (Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming) have become a beacon for growth. They're outperforming California in job creation as
Tax evasion will no longer be possible because everyone will be paying taxes when they spend. In addition, the national sales tax is progressive meaning that the tax base will expand to include illegal immigrants and the underground economy. Although the bill does gather more support than the flat tax which proposes to make everyone pay the same rate of income tax, it remains very unlikely this legislation will pass because of the criticism it receives.
The colonists strongly desired independence and separation from Britain once taxation without representation was imposed on them. The colonies struggled to earn their representation in the Parliament of their mother country. They were turned down repeatedly and this caused huge issues for the colonists; it was the complete reason for the Revolutionary War. Therefore, the demand for no taxation without representation was the primary force to motivate America against Britain and it was also a symbol for democracy.
Next, the Court examined the clause's phrase "commerce among the several States," concluding that the word "among" means "intermingled with." Accordingly, Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce does not "stop at the external boundary line of each State, but may be introduced into the interior." In other words, Congress may pass any law that regulates commerce, so long as that commerce is not wholly confined within a single state, and its power to regulate such commerce is plenary. Under this interpretation of the Commerce Clause, Congress' clearly had the authority to regulate the commercial steamboat route between New York and New Jersey. It was assumed that the licensing act of 1793 did this and that the New York law in question
Texas does outperform other states in terms of economic growth and population growth. Many people move to Texas because of the jobs and they do taxes right. (Batheja, 2013) Gov. Rick Perry believes Texas’s performance through the recession is due to lack of income tax. He says “You can stop trying to figure out how to pay the state income tax, because we don’t have one.” (Batheja, 2013) The Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning research group, ranks Texas ninth-best on its State Business Tax Climate Index, largely because of the state’s lack of an income tax. (Batheja, 2013) On the other hand, Texas’s high property taxes remains a crucial complaint among business and homeowners. It’s harder for small business to pay their taxes especially if their business wasn’t very profitable. Small business end up using their own personal savings, mortgages, or borrow money in order to pay their taxes. Having a state tax would benefit small business. Although having no state tax is accepted by many, it puts a dent on cities and towns. Local debt has increased over the past decade, in large part to cover the costs for new schools and public maintenance projects. (Batheja, 2013) The state is pushing projects such as building of highways and roads to cities and counties. (Batheja, 2013) In 2012, more than 500 lawsuits were from school districts arguing that our public education isn’t properly
So, without revenue from income tax, these states pay for the basic functions of government by their citizens who eat, wear
The national government has power to petition the states to pay taxes. The states do not have the power to regulate interstate trade. Ginsbery asserts that the national government has a federal court system to resolve court related issues (34). The states have the power to apportion taxes as per the population statistics. Each state has a single vote. The national government deserves the right to dispose land parcels in the western part of the nation. Congress also had the power to establish different post offices. This function led to the efficient management of the information communication system in both the states and the central
The power to tax resided within the states. Congress could request taxes from the states, but had no right to impose a tax. To levy the requested tax though 9/13 states had to agree with it which made Congress led taxes harder to pass. An example of this would have been when Robert Morris attempted to raise revenue to reduce inflation. Many states opposed his proposal for a national tariff, which would raise a five percent tax on foreign goods, and so it never came to
fter passage by both houses, a bill is submitted to the President. The President may choose to sign the bill, thereby making it law. The President may also choose to veto the bill, returning it to Congress with his objections. In such a case, the bill only becomes law if each house of Congress votes to override the veto with a two-thirds majority. Finally, the President may choose to take no action, neither signing nor vetoing the bill. In such a case, the Constitution states that the bill automatically becomes law after ten days (excluding Sundays). However, if Congress adjourns (ends a legislative session) during the ten day period, then the bill does not become law. Thus, the President may veto legislation passed at the end of a congressional
Iowa has also drastically increased its reliance on revenue from corporate income taxes in recent years, which makes the aforementioned tax incentive refunds even more alarming. In the early 2000’s, the state was collecting between 2-3% of its total revenue from corporate income taxes (Census Bureau, 2001-2002) . As of 2013, 5.1% of state revenue was collected from corporate taxes, which is only slightly below the national average of 5.3% (2014)2. The increase
Why weren’t the thirteen colonies willing to abide by England’s laws? While some people were horrified with the Stamp Act, others were completely accepting of this new act. Janis Herbert stated in her book, The American Revolution for Kids, that after the French and Indian War, England had many debts, which obviously needed to be paid (3). England’s Parliament decided the American colonists needed to pay their debts for them. England went about this matter by raising taxes and requiring a stamp for fifty different documents (Gale Encyclopedia Par. 2). Since America was not yet a country, and had no representation, they were trapped with the laws Parliament passed. Even though England was trying to pay off their debts from the French & Indian War, they went about it the wrong way, because they expected the American colonists to pay by increased tax dollars. This is an example of taxation without representation, because the American colonists didn't have representatives, or the opportunity to vote.
Article 1 of the United States Constitution-within its ten sections-establishes the collective rights of all legislative bodies in the United States, such as Congress, the House of Representatives, the Senate as well as the individual State governments. Specifically, within Section 10, it is written that a State is not allowed to pass any law that “impairs the obligation of contracts.” This is known as the Contracts Clause. The Contracts Clause disallows any State to invalidate anything on a nationwide level, including the levying of taxes or the abolition of contracts. (constitution.laws.com/the-supreme-court/contracts-clause)
Would it be possible to consider placing a flat $.10 FEDERAL TAX on ALL online sales no matter what the cost of the product or service purchased? This is not a percentage of the sale, but a flat tax that would never increase. Most add sales tax to online purchases based on the total sale, but I think there could be significant revenue gained if a SMALL flat Federal Tax was added. If there are approximately 4,000,000,000 online purchases a day, seven days a week, a $.10 (10-cent) Federal Tax added to each transaction could help reduce the deficit without causing a hardship on anyone. The retailer would collect and forwards the Federal Tax to the government at the end of every month, just
Since the recent passage of the Internet Tax Freedom Act, on October 21, 1998, making the Internet tax free, there has been an intense debate on whether to tax or not to tax Internet purchases. The conservative side, also known as the Republicans, is opposed to Internet taxation saying that it is too costly to collect taxes on Internet purchases. They also believe that since Internet retailers do not have a physical presence in every state, why should the state receive sales tax on a nonexistent store in that state? This would be taxation without representation (par. 18 Lukas). On the other hand, the liberals, also known as democrats, believe that taxation of the Internet should be lawful because