How Market Abuse Caused Abusive Behavior The Financial Market

Discuss how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy.

Following a number of discovered fraud scandals committed by well-known corporations and in order to restore public confidence in the stock market and trading of securities, the United States congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the year 2002. As a result of the act endorsement by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission, among many other national overseeing committees, a number of rules and regulations were proposed and adopted and that demanded new processes and programs be instilled for ensuring compliance with the requirements of the new law. The new rules and regulations pertaining to the enacted law have a common goal:

In 2008, when the financial crisis occurred, millions of Americans were left without jobs and trillions of dollars of wealth was lost wealth. To make sure the Great Recession would not happen again, President Barrack Obama put into effect the Dodd- Frank Act. With the help of this law, banks will not be able to take irresponsible risks that had negative effects on the American people. Furthermore, with the Volcker Rule embedded into the act, it will ensure that banks are no longer allowed to own, invest, or sponsor hedge funds, private equity funds, or proprietary trading operations for their own profit, unrelated to serving their

The United States has one of the biggest and fastest growing economies of the world. Our financial system has been affected by numerous crises throughout the years and as a result Congress has reacted in the most recent times and two well-known acts have been signed into laws by the presidents at the time to protect investors and consumers alike. A brief overview of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a discussion of some of the provisions therein, opinions of others regarding the act and also my personal and professional opinion will be discussed below. The same will be examined about the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

This essay will review the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (as amended) (‘CPUTs’) to assess how they are responsible for the operation of the Internal Market and consider whether the CPUTs have accomplished its objective of consumer protection. This essay will first explain the Internal Market and the significance of regulation and then proceed to demonstrate how the CPUTs enable the Internal Market to function properly and its protection of consumers.

In the past, the ruling financial systems, such as agencies and laws, led to certain areas of the market without regulation. One of the areas, lacking regulation, was the protection of consumers from aggressive or “bad” financial products. In this sense, Title X of the Dodd-Franck Act creates a new regulatory agency, the CFPB, whose mandate and mission is

Regulations such as the Insider Trading Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) enhance protection and eradicate unethical business practices. Despite the various laws in place to protect individuals, just turn on the news, read the paper, or glance online at the numerous corporate scandals. Enactment of legislation such as SOX and the Dodd-Frank Act endeavored to restore the public’s trust. Do these rules mitigate the risk, or are they burdensome on broker-dealer such as Group Capital? While laws exist to protect consumers, investors, and shareholders, the question remains are they excessive. The sustainability and ramifications of financial regulation receive minimal thought, and the possibility of future crises garners even less consideration. Kaal (2013) indicated a sense of urgency around rule-making, yet it may not allow a full evaluation of the effect on a broker-dealer. Many of these decisions consider the economic, political, and legal costs on society and not the impact on businesses. Regulators need to balance consumer protection without being punitive towards the financial industry. These factors need balance, or they could stifle business

Insider dealing has been affecting the efficiency of stock markets in different places like United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Hong Kong is of no exception. Basically, insider dealing refers to the trading of a corporation’s stock or other securities by individual with potential access to non-public information of the company. The law of insider dealing in Hong Kong provides a much more detailed definition and is very comprehensive. However, when it comes to enforcement, it seems not very effective. In the following, the law of insider dealing in Hong Kong will be summarized. After analyzing the comprehensiveness of the law, the underlying reasons of the difficulty in enforcement will be identified. Some

When the financial crisis during 2008 hit the economy, people panicked. In an attempt to stabilize the market, the government took action. The various actions taken in 2008 by the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Bank, as well as the new regulations proposed and implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, were generated to reduce and mitigate the systemic risk created by the Money Market Mutual Funds. These actions and regulations, as well as the systemic risk created, will be addressed during the upcoming paragraphs.

| * David should not disclose confidential information outside the firm. * If he seeks advice from his friend Peter, he will breach S140.1 & S140.5. * Peter can trade this information to benefit him – affecting MAL.

Insider trading refers to the trading of a listed company’s stock or other financial securities by individuals who has access to non-public material information about the company. This action often occurs within employees/ex-employees of the listen company. Information is considered to be non-public material information if making it public would affect the price of securities, and using such information in decisions to buy or sell financial securities would be unfair to non-insiders (Bainbridge, 2013). Insider trading is treated as a mischief in more than 90 countries, and defendants are imposed with penalties (Beny, 2012). Specific insider conduct regulations in New Zealand were first enacted in 1988, followed by amendments in 2002, 2006 and 2008. The insider conduct regimes between 1988 and 2008 are often considered as a failure due to weak enforcements. Thus in 2008, the regulator introduced a new regime, which was a close model to the Australian insider conduct legislation. Both regimes are expansive, meaning it could be applied to any person in possession of insider information. However, while the Australian laws were aggressively enforced (more than 26 prosecutions were brought since then), no prosecutions have been launched under the new legislation in New Zealand. In addition, New Zealand also had no convictions secured prior to 2008, illustrating a clear enforcement deficit in the New Zealand

Financial regulation is necessary and without an efficient set of regulations a country could see rises in unemployment, interest rates, and the deterioration of financial intermediaries. With the globalization of the financial industry, it becomes more and more common for businesses to seek financing outside of their county 's boarders. These innovations in the financial industry stress why it is so important for regulations to be created and changed to reduce risk and asymmetric information in financial systems.

This study is focused on an aspect of the financial market, and on the private life of customers. There is, thus a real ethical issue

It’s an important market for the world economy to make a comprehensive financial relation between investors and people who has savings. An effective financial market is related with developing economy of world and GDP of countries around the world and increases of individual wealth. Financial markets are in every county in the world but the sizes of those are different from each other by the participations of buyers and sellers. The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Forex markets become the world largest financial markets by trading trillion of dollars on daily basis. There are more financial markets that have heavy trading and demand for securities on some specific periods and historically prices rises by this time on

Moreover, a look at our neighboring securities regimes allows for inputs from sophisticated systems of securitization. The regulatory frameworks in Malaysia and Singapore not only provides for regulatory agencies for domestic corporations in their respective stock exchange but includes in their respective market infrastructure agencies for international business