Immorality of the Death Penalty, A Speech

Now, in order to truly look at the topic at hand, I feel that it is necessary to examine a few different viewpoints when it comes to this ethical issue. These viewpoints are called deontological, and utilitarianism. Each approach provides a unique look in the idea of capital punishment and will help to look at the consequences at the present time, as well as in the future. The question of whether it is ethically acceptable to take the life of someone is at the heart

The death penalty is a topic that has been argued for and against by many people. Some have no qualms with the punishment while others protest it greatly. As such there are three main arguments that are presented by both sides; is the death penalty immoral, does the death penalty deter crime, and should the death penalty ultimately be allowed in the court of law.

Why is the death penalty used as a means of punishment for crime? Is this just a way to solve the nations growing problem of overcrowded prisons, or is justice really being served? Why do some view the taking of a life morally correct? These questions are discussed and debated upon in every state and national legislature throughout the country. Advantages and disadvantages for the death penalty exist, and many members of the United States, and individual State governments, have differing opinions. Yet it seems that the stronger arguments, and evidence such as cost effectiveness, should lead the common citizen to the opposition of Capital Punishment.

The topic of death penalty is highly controversial and debated on in American society. The death penalty has put many convicted murderers and criminals on the government. Using death sentence as a punishment for extreme crimes portrays America in a negative way. Although the death penalty brings justice to violent criminals, I argue that the death penalty is immoral and financially crippling the United States.

In the United States, the use of the death penalty continues to be a controversial issue. Every election year, politicians, wishing to appeal to the moral sentiments of voters, routinely compete with each other as to who will be toughest in extending the death penalty to those persons who have been convicted of first-degree murder. Both proponents and opponents of capital punishment present compelling arguments to support their claims. Often their arguments are made on different interpretations of what is moral in a just society. In this essay, I intend to present major arguments of those who support the death penalty and those who are opposed to state sanctioned executions application . However, I do intend to fairly and accurately

Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin O’Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today about why I believe the death penalty should be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency, and expenditure.

If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers

(Death Row on Trial 2001: video) Religiously, the death penalty can also be morally justified because the Bible states “an eye for an eye” (Exodus 21:23-27) which can be interpreted as a life for a life.

Few issues in the United States today are as emotionally charged and controversial as the death penalty. Formally know as capital punishment, the death penalty has been hotly debated not only as a legal issue, but as a religious, ethical, and political one, historically as well as in the present day. Although many states currently administer the death penalty, Texas has been put in the spot light this past year because of the recent presidential race. The moral question of whether or not it is right to kill another human being is ever-present in today's society. However, when looking at it from a political standpoint, one must also consider whether or

Thesis: The death penalty uses cruel and unusual brutal methods which violate the Constitution of the United States of America and; therefore, it should be abolished as society continues to embrace the relative value of life.

B. Subpoint: One may believe that the money being used for the execution could be used to help other issues within the state. Some of the issues it could help with could possibly be helping build more prisons to house the criminals, and helping within the school system.

The death penalty is immoral and inhumane and violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unconstitutional punishment. William J. Brennan, Justice of the US Supreme Court,

From an early age, children are taught that murder is morally wrong. In today’s complex society that is impeded by unsettling periods of civil unrest, it is an expectation for everyone to acknowledge and accept that murder is one of the worst crimes individuals can commit. Perhaps it can be said that the death penalty is one of our legal system’s biggest contradictions of itself, as, if someone commits murder (or another heinous crime of that caliber), such ‘murderers’ will, in states that have capital punishment laws, be sent to Death Row and ultimately murdered in order to prevent potential future crimes by such perpetrators. I believe that the death penalty is wrong not only as it is immoral to take a life, but also, such ineffective laws waste money and do not deter crime.

Within knowledge and experience the most controversial opinions are formed. The death penalty has been argued for decades now only to conclude that it is a very opinion based argument rather than a factual one. Because of this, the situation intensifies as emotions and morals are put on trial. It is climacteric that while the topic at hand will be edified it will also be illuminated from the two spectrums of the argument. The death penalty has stood for some, as a depiction of murder or maybe even the act of playing God. Others believe that it is indeed in violation of the eighth amendment within our nation’s constitutional values. While the more politically correct of the nation believe that the death penalty

Since I have watched many movies and TV shows that involve death row inmates, I figured that through this essay I would be able to gain a solid understanding of this issue in today’s society. I began my research by trying to answer the question, “How does capital punishment affect society today?” I then realized that this question was too broad and then decided to break it up into three issues. Does capital punishment deter murder, does it go against human rights, thus making us uncivil, and does it led to the wrongful executions of innocent persons. All of these issues are important but to write an effective essay I would have to choose one of these issues. I believe that my sources are efficient at clearly stating the issue at hand and bringing forth an unbiased viewpoint. My sources provide an understanding of the issue “Does capital punishment deter murder?”. In order for someone to answer this question, he or she would have to at least comprehend the different sides of the issue. The three sides or perspectives that I believe would help include: yes - capital punishment deters murder rates, no – capital punishment doesn’t deter murder rates, and no – capital punishment encourages the taking of life. I believe that these questions will be able to better educate anyone who is unfamiliar with capital punishment and the effects it has on society. Since this topic is so widely debated across the world, there will be many different viewpoints but only three will