I had many reflections—as a student, teacher, and educator—after reading the article, “Knowing Mathematics for Teaching” by Ball, Hill-Bass, and Bass (2005). Ball and her colleagues (2005) discuss the issue that there are many different schools of thoughts and practices about the way teachers should be prepared and supported to teach mathematics in classrooms. On the one hand, teachers are asked to take additional math content classes, attend teaching- practice and new curriculum workshops. On the other hand, Bass et al. (2005) tell us there have been efforts to recruit teacher based on strong college grades in mathematics majors. Yet, Ball et al. suggests the need to continue to research the relationship between the level of preparation and knowledge in mathematical to student achievement to “ensure that every student has a teacher who comes to the classroom equipped with the mathematical knowledge needed for teaching” (p. 44). First, as a student, the article initially led me to reflect on my own experience as a student in K-12. For example, I thought about my experience with mathematical content and the resources I was exposed to attending urban public schools and the issue with limited resources. Indeed, I believe my K-12 mathematic teachers were teaching me the best they could, however, as I got older I have realized that it is not my strongest academic content. As I continue to analyze and reflect on my experience I continued to come across the juxtapose idea of
This paper will demonstrate the pre-service teachers’ understanding of mathematical practices as part of the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. It will address two specific standards for Mathematical Practices, describing the essence of both and providing a description of how teachers facilitate these practices and how students are engaged in the practices.
The purpose of the study is to identify how varying ways of knowing mathematics manifests in the use of the core practice of facilitating classroom discourse. I am interested in better understanding how teachers use their mathematical knowledge for teaching to facilitate meaningful discourse. Gaining greater understanding it this area will aid in assisting teachers in developing the skill of facilitating meaningful discourse. The ability to engage students in mathematical discussions that enhance student learning has continued to be a topic in mathematics education and is viewed as a major component of mathematics education reform. It is vital that teachers, novice and experienced, develop the skills necessary to create a learning environment
It is crucial to develop in children the ability to tackle problems with initiative and confidence…mathematics has changed from careful rehearsal of standard procedures to a focus on mathematical thinking and communication to prepare them for the world of tomorrow (Anghileri, 2006, p.2).
Disturbingly, “nearly one-fifth of high school students and over 50 percent of middle school students are enrolled in math classes whose teachers neither majored or minored in math” (Drew, 2011, p.9). In 2000, 31 percent of high
Essential aspects that underpin the professional and dedicated educator include the revising of knowledge and experience, reflection, and an effort in understanding their students. Within mathematics, these skills are informed by the curriculum chosen, the students involved, and the pedagogy that is selected, that create the professional judgement cycle (as seen in Appendix One) (Department of Education and Training Western Australia [DETWA], 2013a). The more teachers understand about their students, the more they can adapt the learning environment to cater for these different learning approaches (Burns, 2010).
The general belief around the country (or perhaps even the world) is that math classes will be beneficial to a well rounded student. In some cases, such as the author argued, this might be true as a recent high school graduate who hasn't had the life experiences that someone later in their life might have. The author continues to explain that in their line of previous work and general experience, they already have the general math knowledge that their degree will need.
This chapter explores the underperforming United States education system that does not prepare students to be creative, think critically, work collaboratively, or communicate effectively to be ready to participate in society (Ferguson, 2011, p. 7). In addition to overall underwhelming performance in academics, the failure to incorporate real world everyday experiences in mathematics prevents students from developing critical thinking and logic skills so that they will be responsible and active citizens of society and have access to jobs in the fields science, technology, mathematics, and engineering (STEM).
Erik Erickson, a parent to a second-grader, originally supported common core, stating that: “In a society as mobile as ours, kids moving from one state to another should not be so far behind or ahead students in their new state. A common set of skills at each grade across the nation makes sense (“Why Parents Like Me are Angry about Common Core”).” However, once he saw his own child struggling to keep up with the “convoluted” mathematic lessons, he had to reexamine his own opinions on the matter. Erickson and his wife (both proficient mathematicians), struggled to help their second grader with her math homework; and they weren’t the only ones. Erickson received calls from many parents expressing how they too had difficulty helping their children with their schoolwork; one mother described how her child’s school offered to give her lessons on the material so she could help her child (“Why Parents Like Me are Angry about Common Core”). This is the crux of
Research journals and the information provided within the pages of these articles must be critically analyzed and read. There is a series of steps in completing both tasks. However, at the start it is vital to ensure that the journals, topic information, and authors are all credible. This process is also necessary to make sure that the credibility of this information is professionally supported and held to a scholarly standard. In support of my research topic, I selected an article that I have deemed a credible source. I will demonstrate through a ten-step process of critically analyzing a journal article. The title, Math Wars 2: It’s the Teaching, Stupid, by John Marshall, published in the Phi Delta Kappan (2006). The analysis used is a
With the disparities in standardize test scores in mathematics, the “education debt” has grown significantly in my school district. In our education system, the student achievement rate and academic gap have been moving in two different directions. As a result of this continuing transition, the district is in the process of identifying a student-learning problem in order to find the underlying issues, specifically in middle school mathematics. Before we jump the gun, an understanding of the district’s status quo is first priority to contextualizing and articulating a clear problem of
The responsibility of learning math isn't only of the educational system or the teachers but also of the
Raymond McGivney, professor in mathematics, in order to understand his students’ individual mathematical history. In this program, Fiore asked his students to write down their memories of math during their school years, whether the students’ experiences were negative or positive. What he learned was that some of his students’ trouble with understanding mathematics stemmed from both emotional and psychical abuse while they were in grade school as well as in the home. This pushed Fiore to find mechanisms that would help the students’ break through their math trauma so they would be able to embrace positive messages and clear learning instruction that would get them to feel positive about being active in classroom math lessons as well as being able to successfully pass their math course. More importantly, it’s also about teachers having the emotional strength and proper lesson tools in order to rebuild a student’s self-esteem that’s been damaged in the very early years of their education through careless words and actions of teachers and sometimes, parents.
They teach the math curriculum to their students and help them prepare for college math courses or standardized tests. In order to accomplish these tasks, math teachers have to create lesson plans that incorporate the public education requirements. Math teachers must be able to evaluate students and discover their abilities, strengths and weaknesses and be able to push students’ intellectual boundaries. They must not get frustrated or give up when a student does not care or does not understand the math concept. they must find other creative ways to teach the
In today’s society mathematics is a vital part of day-to-day life. No matter what a person is doing at home or at the workplace, he/she is constantly using different mathematics skills to simply function. Then what does this mean for mathematics education? When someone needs to utilize a skill every day then he/she needs a strong background in the skill. Therefore, today’s students need more than a just a working knowledge of mathematics or enough knowledge to pass a test. Today’s students need to understand how mathematics works and how to utilize mathematics skills in the best way possible.
Mathematics has always been a difficult subject for students. Many children have developed phobias and barriers towards mathematics, which prevail into adulthood, thus limiting their potential. This limitation implies problems of learning, resulting in the child a sense of inferiority.