Current assets
Inventories
The difference between net income and profits adjusted for current cost of supply comes down to the way inventories are accounted for.
The net income figure is calculated according to IFRS standards in Europe which demand ‘first-in first-out’ (FIFO) methodology for accounting inventory. Most US companies however produce based on ‘last-in first-out’ (LIFO) accounting.
Shell’s current cost of supply (CCS), however, are neither FIFO nor LIFO compliant. This means that Shell’s CCS figure are not recognized by US GAAP or IFRS. They are an industry measure only provided for in quarterly results for the benefit of investors.
Instead of the FIFO method, Shell uses a weighted cost pricing methodology for
…show more content…
Overall inventory on the balance sheet is also higher for a company on FIFO than a company on LIFO in inflationary periods. The reverse holds for deflationary periods.
In other words: in an environment where prices are declining, CCS figures outperform their historical records. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet | Current assets: | $ million | | 3rd Quarter 2009 | 3rd Quarter 2010 | Inventories | 25,420 | 28,922 | Accounts receivable | 66,966 | 62,769 | Cash and cash equivalents | 14,275 | 11,282 | Downstream | Quarter | $ million | Q3 2009 | Q3 2010 | % | | 6,121 | 6,385 | + 4 | Oil Products sales volumes (thousand b/d) | 4,723 | 5,333 | + 13 | Chemical sales volumes (thousand tonnes) |
If we take a look at the inventories and actual volumes sold during the 3rd quarter of 2010, we see increasing sales volumes and corresponding build up in inventory.
Oil Products sales volumes were 4% higher than in the third quarter of 2009. Chemical Product sales volumes in the third quarter of 2010 increased by 13% compared to the third quarter of 2009. The latter may be due to an increase in Chemicals manufacturing plant availability in 2010 compared to 2009.
Overall, Shell’s total oil-production sales rose in the period to 6,385 (thousand b/d) vs. 6,121 in the previous quarter. As for the actual crude volumes sales achieved, however, we don’t know
Industry research shows that dip sales are growing at 10% per year. However this growth in 1985 is due to price increases throughout the industry. It is relevant to note
Although the company did show an increased gross profit of $8,255,000 with $6,358,000 less Net Sales in 2013 versus 2012, that increase is due to the reduction in product Cost of Goods Sold by $14,613,000. Since increases in product price will negatively affect sales, one of management’s primary goals is to keep prices stable. This objective is achieved through implementation of cost cutting programs, investing in more efficient equipment, and automation of more steps in the production process.
The company uses FIFO inventory method (first in, first out) to value inventory. This method assumes that the first unit making its way into inventory is the first sold. It means that the goods that were most recently purchased are still in inventory. Cost of goods sold (COGS) = (Beginning inventory + Purchases) – Ending inventory. The costs are chronologically charged to cost of goods sold (COGS) i.e., the first costs incurred are first costs charged to cost of goods sold (COGS). This explains why Logitech’s Inventories are stated at the lower of cost of market, taking into consideration the nature of products such as PC components, gaming products, wireless devices that become obsolete fast enough or exceed the market’s demand.
45. (LO1) ATW corporation currently uses the FIFO method of accounting for its inventory for book and tax
The net income on the income statement is used on the equity section for the balance sheet. When the net income increases of decreases because of revenue or expenses this carries over to the balance sheet under the equity section and reflects those fluctuations. This helps to give a better
In Note 7 (pages 215-216), Harnischfeger describes the effect of LIFO inventory liquidation on its reported profits in 1984. Describe what is meant by LIFO liquidation, and how liquidation affects a company’s income statement and balance sheet.
Net income is reduced through depreciation and is an expense of the company. It does not reduce cash of the company. This adjustment does not involve the calculations of current cash flow. Calculations should be put back on net income in order to produce the outcomes of cash that has been provided by the operations of
e LIFO cost flow method of inventory costing (Martin, J. R.). From Harry Davis’ article, a search for alternatives of the base stock method started, because of the base stock method was no longer apply to the income tax purposes, the acceptance of LIFO by professional groups represents the last part its early development. If the idea of LIFO was not being permitted, there will be a huge loss on the development of the accounting tools. Nobody will know that there is a method of inventory management could help company for the tax purpose. According to Steven Bragg’s article, nowadays, the LIFO method is not applying for IFRS. Although IRS allows the LIFO method, but it must apply for all parts of the financial reports (July, 2017). The Treasury claimed that is hard for them to management and regulate the information if LIFO were applied to a large group of people that using LIFO for the tax purposes. Congress compensated some industries with LIFO, because some of industries was unsuccessful in getting the internal revenue service to recognize of their business practices. The hearings for the 1938 Revenue Act indicate that LIFO was considered appropriate only under the conditions listed
Since the net income reported in the statement of cash flows is transferred from the profit and loss account which is the difference between revenue and expenditures all of two types;
section). This shows an increase in product purchases and an increase in market share (an increase
Support: The inventory increase in 1997, YOY, was 58%. Additionally, the COGS to revenue ratio reduced from to 72% in 1997. This combination of increase in inventory and reduction in COGS as a percentage of revenue seems to indicate that the fixed costs may have been spread over a larger base through over production, thereby causing the COGS to reduce. This may be a cause for concern and could be a potential red flag.
Reasons for differences between net income and comprehensive income: The reasons for differences between net income and comprehensive income as reported in the financial statements are the comprehensive income includes foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax), decline of unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities (net of tax effect), and amortization of unrealized loss on terminated Euro Currency Swap (net of tax).
Net income is total revenues minus total expenses incurred to generate those revenues all within the same reporting period. Net income is calculated by the accrual accounting methodology meaning that the expenses incurred to generate revenues are reported at the same time the related revenues are reported. Both revenue recognition and expenses paid may not coincide with actual cash transactions. Net cash from operating activities, on the other hand, is not determined by accrual but by
A company must pay attention to the number of days of its sales it holds in inventory to determine the amount of time it will take to convert the inventory on hand into sales (Gibson, 2011). As shown in Exhibit 3, 3M increased from 81.74 days of sales in inventory in 2007 to 82.20 days in 2008. At face value, an increase suggests a slight negative trend for 3M as it is holding onto more inventory, taking longer to sell
Reviewing Exhibit 1 it is indicative that each year their actual inventory ratio continued to increase as opposed to decreasing. Keeping inventory in stock is good for clients but bad for capital when it remains on the shelves and doesn’t sell as quickly as you are producing it.