Is Outsourcing Bad Or Good? The Us Economy?

By 2004, more than 80 percent of U.S. executive boardrooms will have discussed offshore sourcing, and more than 40 percent of U.S. enterprises will have completed some type of pilot or will be sourcing IT (information technology) services. In fact, some of the biggest firms in the United States have been seriously discussing outsourcing recently. One of these companies being IBM, the world's biggest computer maker, discussed saving about $168 million beginning in 2006 by moving thousands of programming jobs overseas, according to internal information provided. U.S. businesses, battered by the recent three year bear market in stocks and an economy struggling to find its footing, have already developed a taste for super cheap labor in developing countries, where workers are increasingly better trained especially if they've spent significant time working in the United States on temporary visas. The impact of overseas outsourcing could be significant; many economists doubt the trend is big enough yet to disrupt the broader U.S. economy. Imports of business services account for less than 1/20 of 1 percent of gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation's economy. At the least, it's not doing much to end the longest U.S. labor-market slump since World War II. More than 9.3 million people are

Outsourcing is a process in which large corporations move various jobs such as: production of goods, online coding, telemarketing, and human recourses to name a few to foreign countries in order to cut down on employment rates, and raise their profit margin. Moreover, the low amount companies pay overseas employees, lower standard of work environment, cutbacks on various fees that are usually found in the U.S., and much more make outsourcing seem very desirable. However, outsourcing can be argued as favorable, or unfavorable depending on the audience, and their outlook on the issue. I personally side with the viewpoint that outsourcing long term is unfavorable for America. I find this issue very interesting, complex, and large because of the

Many people may compare outsourcing to hashtags or selfies, a waste of time and pointless. Also, people may say that outsourcing hit America in a huge tidal wave that is now uncontrollable. Ehrenreich exemplifies this when she writes,”I should’ve seen it coming. In the eighties, US companies began outsourcing the manufacturing of everything from garments to steel, leaving whole cities to die” (609). Basically, Ehrenreich is saying that if outsourcing ruined us then, it will ruin us now; but clearly outsourcing has not ruined us that much because, of all of the jobs that we have outsourced in the last decade, we’re still standing strong. Zakaria contradicts this by saying,”Over the past twenty years, as globalization and outsourcing have accelerated dramatically, America’s growth rate has averaged just over 3 percent” (619). We’ve outsourced all of these jobs and yet our population has grown. The fact that we’re giving opportunities to other countries has not taken

Globalization is the integration of markets through the cooperation of internalization, federal, and state governments with corporate companies to provide low-cost products. Subsequently, outsourcing is an essential part of this globalization. However, what exactly is outsourcing? In its broadest sense, outsourcing is simply contracting out functions that had been done in-house—a longtime U.S. practice (“Globalization: Threat or Opportunity”). When a U.S. manufacture product, and buys material from an intermediate supplier from out of the country rather than producing them in-house, that is what is called outsourcing. Also, when U.S. corporation hires outside contractor out-of-the-country to do U.S. call center services for less labor cost that is outsourcing. When a company deals out its operational task, such as payroll, accounting, and software operations that is outsourcing. To get the clear understanding of outsourcing, I have interviewed IKEA’s U.S. Deputy Retail Country Manager Rob Olson about outsourcing—Swedish goods. Olson stated that IKEA’s outsourcing utilizes the unique talents of different countries and their labor markets to increase trade, which helps better allocate resources in their own countries while getting goods cheaper from others.

To begin with, some people are against it because the use of outsourcing takes the jobs that could be filled by Americans and gives them to people in other countries.The opportunity for an American to provide for his family is swept off beneath him when these jobs are given to people of other countries.A great example is one from the article “The Cost of American Outsourcing”. The Company “Whirlpool” closed it’ refrigeration assembly line in order to move it down to Mexico in which it left more than 1,200 Americans without jobs.In most cases these people

Outsourcing does not typically expand in the United States; this is because of high wages and the struggle of keeping a job. Therefor, when a company outsources it hands over jobs in foreign countries. The United States career opportunities were diminished by 2.9 million while the jobs boosted by 2.4 million overseas. With those numbers, that means big name companies are only hiring 20 percent of Americans. (americanprogress.org). If all jobs are being shipped away, what is left here? This only enables other countries room for improvement.

You may have been asked if your job is next with the recent outbreak of shipping American jobs overseas. Lately, all of the corporate talk is about outsourcing and how it’s helping American companies grow, but what is not talked about is how it’s going to effect the American economy in the next few years and what should be done to stop it. Outsourcing is a modern plague that is killing the American dream. Its long-term effect is catastrophically damaging to the American economy and Americans need to step up their educational expectations, skill sets and motivation if they are to keep that long-fought for dream alive.

Throughout time, many things evolve based on current trends. The business world is no exception to evolution. In the world of business, the bottom line is key and wealthy figure heads are paid large sums to bring up profit margins and cut production costs. During the twentieth century, production costs have been cut by the means of outsourcing. Although outsourcing is financially beneficial to large businesses, it has detrimentally impacted the American economy through raises in the unemployment rate, lost countless tax dollars and compromised the integrity of products received.

the general population who lose their occupations should now locate another activity they may not be also fit the bill for as their old employment. these individuals will likewise have more budgetary issues for quite a while which will back off their spending on non-important things. this will hurt the economy in America and additionally bring down the personal satisfaction for Americans.

Outsourcing is a severely underestimated threat to the United States’ economy, which may eventually lead to our next financial crisis. Damages from outsourcing span throughout all levels of the US economy, although the effects of outsourcing are especially devastating to those of the lower class. The threats presented by outsourcing are acknowledged by both of the major presidential candidates: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. In order to prevent the next financial crisis, we must take immediate action.

“Outsourcing has become a controversial practice in the United States because many jobs have moved overseas where those tasks can be accomplished for lower cost” (Ferrell & others 2014). When businesses seek to move jobs away from the United States and into less expensive areas, they are in fact not only affecting small businesses, but they are also contributing to the unemployment population. I say this because over the year’s unemployment has risen and more and more companies are seeking the cheapest method to produce their goods. Initially the expansion to outside countries had good intentions, it has somehow exploded and increased in popularity amongst large corporations.

I would agree with the special report when it says that outsourcing and offshoring are not threats to the US. However, I do think that there are disadvantages to outsourcing and offshoring. Outsourcing and offshoring were originally made for countries to save money in production and labor costs; now places like China and India, the counties that US companies were offshoring too for cheap labor aren’t as cheap anymore. The special report examines some of the disadvantages of outsourcing and offshoring. These disadvantages include: high shipping costs, long transportation time, weakening innovation, and supply chain risks. The biggest known threat that comes hand in hand with outsourcing and offshoring is loss of jobs. But, I don’t think that

Outsourcing overseas is a major disadvantage to the American economy. Contrary to popular belief, companies argue that low- cost labor will in turn save them money and raise competitiveness, which will result in less costly products. When taken into consideration outsourcing eliminates domestic jobs. When a firm outsources, the jobs outsourced are, by definition, removed from the country. These jobs are then sent overseas, where labor is paid far less than in the United States:

Because of the internet, now knowledge processed outsourcing could occur. The internet made American businesses realize that workers oversees could do jobs like data entry, billing and accounting for low wages. Today, X-rays and radiology reports can be sent in a second and anyone in the world could analyze it. Financial investment research and paralegal work could happen from across the world. Any subcontractor from around the world could now be used for outsourcing. The internet has created a whole new genre of outsourcing taking more jobs from

Outsourcing has become an alternative for many major companies as a way to not only manufacture products in other countries, but also employ and develop jobs in other countries in which reality should be available in the United States. Outsourcing as it may seem beneficial to the companies that employ it, actually harms the economy by decreasing the job market that is present in the United states. Offshore outsourcing has a strong potential to affect a variety of jobs ranging from low paid low and skill jobs to high paid and skill jobs. A princeton economist had predicted that about thirty to forty percent american jobs can be offshored in the next ten to twenty years (Institute, 2015). Specifically, informational technology jobs is field that has been targeted to be outsourced in the past, present, and future. A study from the Center for Urban Economic Development found that U.S. imports of business, professional and technical services increased their outsourcing by seventy seven percent in the years of 1997 and 2002 (Offshoring vs Outsourcing, 2015). With the large number of jobs that could move offshore in the future, there is the potential for an increase in the number of jobs moving to other countries, specifically informational technology jobs. This in return would result in a negatively affecting United States jobs and its economy.