preview

Isaiah 's Immanuel, Dr. Edward Hindson

Better Essays

In Isaiah’s Immanuel, Dr. Edward Hindson truly dives into the book of Isaiah. Hindson helps us to grasp the importance and statute of Isaiah. He was not simply a prophet among prophets. He stands out as a citizen of Israel and a servant of God. Hindson does not hold back on his praises of Isaiah and agrees with W.R.Smith, that he is the second most important person throughout the whole story of Israel (2). Isaiah’s writings style still puts modern day scholars in awe. However, Isaiah’s Godly leadership is a principle throughout the book that far exceeds his other attributes. His wisdom, words, and visions from God guided the nation of Israel throughout the reign of Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. Hindon discusses the history of not only Isaiah …show more content…

This idea stems from perceiving the prophecies of Isaiah as immediate in his day. Scholars from Barnes in 1840 to Archer in 1962 agree that there had to be an objective to the words Isaiah had for Ahaz (23). They argue that the woman in the passage was a virgin until she conceived a child with another man. Hindson and others such as Ramm point out a conceptual flaw in the hermeneutics of dual-fulfillment. A prophecy cannot have multiple meanings just to fit the ideas of the reader. A proper hermeneutical involves the concept of word study which Hindson carefully looks at. There is significance in Isaiah’s use of words such as therefore, sign, behold, and many other words in the passage. Digging into the words and the context surrounding them, Hindson reveals that there is a great amount of evidence that points to the woman in the passage being a virgin who is still a virgin even after becoming pregnant with child (44).
Still, the most significant part of the verse is the declaration of the name of the child Immanuel meaning “God with us.” Some choose to believe all mentionings of names referring to God were reminders from God and the people he had a message for at a certain time and place (46). Yet again, with proper hermeneutics it is clear that the sign is directed to a plural people, not Ahaz. The sign was to the “house of David,” is mentioned in verse thirteen. The sign was a coming Messiah which is a reoccurring theme in Hindon’s book. Although

Get Access