Judith Resnik in STEM Women are a minority in the careers of math, science, engineering, and technology. Judith Resnik is one of the most famous females who have succeeded in this career minority. Resnik is known for her amazing intelligence and her involvement in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Judith Resnik is a woman to be remembered in STEM because of her intellectual background, her endeavor to succeed, and her legacy. Judith Resnik was brought into this world by her parents, Dr. Marvin Resnik and Sarah Resnik Belfer, on April 5, 1949 in Akron, Ohio. From the beginning of Resnik’s life, her parents knew she would be intellectually gifted. Before beginning school, Judith was already an avid reader and was able …show more content…
She died with her six crew members during the shuttle’s explosion or its impact with water, the exact cause is inconclusive. The last words that came from the shuttle were, “Go throttle up”. Judith Resnik was awarded the Space Medal of Honor after the explosion. Her legacy lives on after her premature death. As a tribute to the Challenger crew, the Challenger Center for Space Science Education was founded in April of 1986. There are now over 50 Challenger Centers across the nation. Resnik is also honored through a Women’s Health Center and a scholarship for a student pursuing a career in math, science, or space technology. Judith Resnik is one of the most successful members in the women minority of science, technology, engineering, and math. Her intellectual background, her endeavor to succeed, and her legacy will be remembered because they make up one of the greatest women in STEM. Resnik’s life and philosophy can be summed up in her response to an interview saying, “I think something is only dangerous if you aren’t prepared for it, or if you don’t have control over it, or if you can’t think of how to get yourself out of a
On January 28, 1986, a day that was supposed to be filled with excitement and exploration, suddenly turned into a day filled with tragedy and sadness. The space shuttle Challenger was supposed to carry a seven member crew into orbit with one unique member along for this particular mission. Christa McAuliffe was supposed to be the first teacher to go into space as a member of the Teacher in Space Project. Due to this occasion, the media coverage and the number of viewers of this mission was extensive, particularly in schools across the nation. The Challenger lifted off shortly after 11:30 A.M., but tragically only seventy three seconds after takeoff it exploded sending debris and the seven crew members back to earth and into the Atlantic
As per research ‘gender’ provides a perspective from which one could examine the biases that exist in the larger society. Some believe that to arrive at a more eloquent understanding of the problems of women in science , one should begin by asking what is the nature of science space that leads to under-representation and marginalisation of women rather than questioning the situation of a woman’s life that makes it difficult for her to pursue science.
On the morning of January 28th, 1986, Americans watched in shock and horror as the space shuttle Challenger exploded only 74 seconds after its launch, killing all seven crew members on board including a high school teacher Christa McAuliffe. Thousands, including families of the crew and schoolchildren
Throughout Gender and Race in the Physical Sciences, I have been struck by how rarely in STEM we shed a light on the women of color that already exist and thrive in the sciences. Often, when we discuss diversity in the sciences, we only discuss it in the frame of a problem. More specifically, we tend to focus on the problem of there not being enough of these women in the field. As a result of the lack of attention paid to pioneering women in STEM, many young people of all backgrounds are inclined to believe that there are no women of color doing great things in the field- that there are no role models. With this paper, and an on-campus event to be held in the spring, I hope to challenge people’s assumptions about what a scientist looks like, and inspire people through a discussion of innovative women of color.
Imagine being separated from your family when you’re only eight years old. Imagine spending seven months in a 4x6 hole in the ground while being chased by Nazis. This is what Lola Rein endured during the Holocaust.
In 1952 Judith Ortiz Cofer was born in Hormigueros, Puerto Rico, a small municipality with the population around 16,000. At the age of four she and her family moved to Paterson, New Jersey. She went on to spend most of her childhood commuting back and forth between Puerto Rico and Paterson, receiving education in both places. These moves were made due to her father, J.M. Ortiz Cofer and his work in the Brooklyn Navy yard. Coming to America was hard on her family as it was a new place with many new things to get accustomed to. After living in Paterson for some time, the family moved to Augusta, Georgia where she would attend high school and pursue her writing work.
On September 19, 2016, AEON publishes an article by Judith Lichtenberg, “How US prisons violate three principles of criminal justice”. Lichtenberg claims the United States prison system is a failure for society and brings to the table that for most of the time, it is against African Americans. The argument is prominent across America, Lichtenberg writes, but no one is standing up for the better of society. Therefore, she makes known that retribution is a major issue, leading to the type of quandaries we have with the Prison System. Three fundamental principles should control the utilization of incarceration as penalization. Lichtenberg argues everyone should have a fair chance in getting the right punishment, any malefactors, no matter the circumstances, that does the same crime should get the same verdict, and prisons should rehabilitate than eradicate, whether
51 percent of the United States is female but only 34.4 percent of doctors are women. While 90.4 percent of nurses are female (“Women in Medicine”; “Male Nurses Becoming”), the women who do become doctors earn an astounding 25 percent less than their male counterparts (Groves). These staggering figures are only a single piece in the larger overall lack of women in STEM, or science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, which has remained prevalent since the beginning of these fields. Although women are underrepresented in these STEM fields, this is not due to ineptitude, but instead it is a result of the force of societal stereotypes coupled with their wider range of abilities. The recent increase in women’s association with STEM seems
September 1st 2015 would have marked Roberta Hope's 30 years of service and ministry with the Baptist Union of Scotland. Normally we do not circulate fundraising information in Connect, however, Jenny Wilson (a Union staff member) will be running a 10k in October specifically in memory of Roberta and is raising money for the Beatson Cancer Charity. If you would like to support Jenny in her efforts you can do so at,
Anna Skibska is a professional artist who resides and creates in Seattle. She has participated in 56 exhibitions all over the world including local museums SAM, BAM, and the MoG. Skibska is a recipient of several awards and grants. This piece was inspired by the Amazon biospheres, which spoke to her with the language of light and
Hi, my name is Rebecca Wozny. I was born in Hamilton and I’m enrolled in the Network Engineering and Security Analyst program at Mohawk. Outside of school, most of my time is spent at various appointments to help me recover from a car accident. I love animals and I wouldn’t be able to live without at least one pet in my life. I enjoy science fiction and fantasy novels and movies. I like to travel and I feel that I leave a small piece of myself behind in every new place I
Kathryn Lasky is a great writer because she writes stories for all ages and seems like a very interesting person.
Today’s college students have the opportunity and freedom to choose their major and their career path. Many factors influence the decision of a college student’s career paths including background, general interests, personal strengths, time commitment, and job outlook. Although many important decisions are made in college, one of the most important is the choice of major and career track. Out of hundreds of majors the science and engineering fields are under-represented by women. Although the numbers of women in science technology, engineering, and mathematics, STEM, majors has been increasing in the past years, women still are in the minority in the STEM fields. In her study, Lona Whitmarsh
areas of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics employers are not getting enough women (Pozniak). High school girls only represent 17 percent of computer science Advance Placement (AP) test takers (O'Shea). The most significant group of minorities who are behind in earning computer technology degrees and working in science and mathematical professions are women. “Historically, women’s low representation in science and engineering was said to be due in large part of their lack of ability, interest, or both” (Horning 30). However, this is no longer a true fact according to Ward. Some suggestions to increasing the amount of women in sciences include introducing already present women faculty as mentors. Over the last three decades,
Marie Curie... She is best known for her discovery of radium and polonium and her work with radioactivity. She encountered times of adversity in her career just because she was a woman, but she met her challenges and overcame them. Marie Curie exceeded the barriers put on women in her time to become one of the world’s most famous scientists and used her knowledge to the benefit of humanity.