Process vs. Content 1 Week 2 - Process vs. Content Amanda Anderson LDR-625-1634-Leading Organizational Change- March 16, 2015 Robert Miller Process vs. Content 2 Working with children takes a certain level of adaptability in itself, but, working with children in a company that has absolutely no structure is a framework for disaster. However, planning for a process or a process-driven change intervention and task alignment for many companies have yielded successful results. For example, Jon Meliones, the hospital's chief medical director, was intricate in the three year turnaround and transformation at Duke University Children's Hospital …show more content…
Process‐driven change seeks to create a context and environment in which employees at all levels of Process vs. Content 3 the organization engage in a collaborative way to achieve the strategic goals of the organization. Approaches geared and focused on collaborative, participative, and problem‐solving efforts work to align behaviors with strategic requirements (Spector, 2013). In process-driven change, content is used to support rather than initiate ( Spector, 2013). Examples of successfully used change programs are Six Sigma, business process re-engineering, the balanced scorecard, lean enterprise, and Agile ( Spector, 2013). These processes may be utilized to reinforce as opposed to drive new behaviors and leadership roles are directed on solidifying purpose and strategic directions for the organization. As a result of unfreezing and creating new focus new patterns of behavior may emerge ( Spector, 2013). Process‐driven change seeks to create an organizational context in which employees will be motivated to adopt new behaviors consistent with the strategic direction of the organization. Content Driven Change Intervention By definition, content‐driven change is programmatic change in which
Another researcher, John P. Kotter (2006) outlined the “Eight Steps to Transforming Your Organization,” which are:
HRM 587 Discussions 1 Week 5 Organizational Development Theory and Practices-All Students Posts 20 Pages Managing Organization Change
Choosing a change model can be difficult for an organization. The company must ensure that the model it chooses will help them make the smoothest transition possible for everyone involved. The chosen change model must also help the company reach its goal within the time frame the company needs to have changes made.
Akin, G., Dunford, R., & Palmer, I. (2009). Managing organizational change: a multiple perspective approach (2nd. Ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Change is difficult because all organizations cultures, structures, mission, and values are unique. As a result, there is not a “blueprint” that leaders can follow to ensure change initiative success. However, understanding the conditions that promote successful change processes is critically important for leaders. If employees do not support
Akin, G., Dunford, R. & Palmer, I., (2006). Managing organizational change: a multiple perspectives approach, 1e. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Organized Change Consultancy. (2010). Re-engineering and TQM: Approaches to Organizational Change . Available: http://www.organizedchange.com/village.htm. Last accessed 2nd January 2014.
The book The Heart of Change shows the practical side of the theories that are taught in the course textbook. It presents stories of successes and failures based in the application of concepts discussed in Organizational Behavior and Management and in class. Although we talked about several different concepts the ones that are evident in the examples in The Heart Of Change are the more progressive and individual centered approaches. The leadership characteristics that are important to successful change in an organization are those that are espoused in the transformational theory of management. It makes sense that ideals in line with the transformational management theory
Week 3, the lecture on Managing Change describes organizational changes that occur when a company makes a shift from its current state to some preferred future state. Managing organizational change is the process of planning and implementing change in organizations in such a way as to decrease employee resistance and cost to the organization while concurrently expanding the effectiveness of the change effort. Today's business environment requires companies to undergo changes almost constantly if they are to remain competitive. Students of organizational change identify areas of change in order to analyze them. A manager trying to implement a change, no matter how small, should expect to encounter some resistance from within the organization.
The models of change that I have chosen to describe are the ADKAR model and Kotter’s 8 step change model. The ADKAR model is mainly used to help identify and drive change as well as a tool to understand any gaps that are needed to strengthen along the change process. It is also a useful framework for planning change within an organization, before implementation, and in the execution phase of the change management process. This process begins with five key goals that are the basis of the model; awareness of the need to change, desire to participate and support the change, knowledge of how to change, ability to implement the change on a daily basis, and reinforcement to keep the change in place. Each step in the ADKAR model
Introducing organisational change is often hard, the main reasons for that can be variation in perceptions of the employees, fear of disruption or failure and underlining the right approach to apply change. Then even if the change in a specific organisation is projected successfully there is still lot to be done to manage it in an appropriate way (Oakland, 2007).
In order to examine this issue further, this research will look at a number of different sources. Contemporary managerial sources are explored in order to understand how other voices in the field are describing similar methods for change. First, popular structures for change management are examined, especially within their correlation to Palmer & Dunford (2009). This is followed with an extensive
Technology is steady changing in the world today, so therefore organizations are steady having to keep up with technology in order for their businesses to survive. Since the workforce is becoming more and more diverse and customers are requiring much more, leaders must deal with changes in both domestic and global markets and competition (Ivancevich, Konopaske, & Matteson, p.8). There are many ways to go about successful change within the organization, but it’s all about how you present the information to the people within the organization. The Heart of Change focused around eight steps on how successful change comes about. According to Krotter and Cohen, the most fundamental problem in all of the stages is changing the behavior of people. It’s very difficult to try and change an organization when one had been accustom to doing things a certain way. In this paper we will discuss the eight steps presented in The Heart of Change compared to the textbook Organizational Behavior and Management.
In the review of the book, “Making Change Work: Practical Tools for Overcoming Human Resistance to Change,” I decided to summarize the major steps the book establishes. It discusses how to begin the change process by understanding your need for change, to the final step of the change process where an organization needs to implement changes. After summarizing the steps, I am going to show how the book relates to the textbook, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, as well as giving a managerial implication.
For any business in the rapidly evolving world of business, planning and implementing successful organizational change is indispensable. Essentially, organizational change refers to a process whereby an organization strives to optimize performance in order to achieve its ideal state characterized by high performance and profitability (Côté & Mayhew, 2014). Any business would be more likely to lose its competitive edge, as well as fail to meet the demands of its loyal consumers if it doesn’t plan and implement change. Weiss (2012) emphasizes that all organizations ought to embrace change, and it’s imperative to note that successful organizational change doesn’t involve simple process of adjustments; instead it requires appropriate change management capabilities.