Liability Exposure Within Multiple Businesses

| The partners are jointly and severally liable for business debts and obligations. The partners are held personally responsible for the business and may be sued personally for liability. Partners’ personal assets are subject to lawsuit(s) made against the business. Lack of continuity; death of a partner may end the partnership/business if a buy/sell agreement is not in place. Disagreements may be difficult to resolve.

Due to its nature, partnership is generally liable for the acts of the individual partners if committed in the course of the partnership business. However, liabilities of every partner may be regulated by the written agreement signed by partners. If no written agreement is signed by partners, liabilities of the partnership are regulated by the Partnership Act. If one of the partners retires, he or she may not be liable for the future debts of partnership if an official notice of the change is sent to creditors and the public. However, there were no official notice sent by the partners in the case; therefore, Toby may be liable for the debts of partnership. Due to the death of the third partner, partnership may be dissolved. In order to pay off the debts, assets should be sold and partners are free to continue the same kind of business after the dissolution of the

Many believe that liability is a biggest issue in a general partnership than in a sole proprietorship. The owners of the company are still fully liable for any debts the company may accrue as well as the liability for any lawsuits that may be brought against the company. However, the bigger issue in a partnership is that now each partner can be liable for the other partner’s actions. If one partner is sued for malpractice, the other partner may suffer because of it.

When it comes to partnerships Alex, Bill, Carl, and Devon will have two options- a general partnership or a limited partnership. Partnerships are beginning to be a business form of the past. Once upon a time, partnerships were “the default form of business and provided the benefit of pass-through taxation, but lacked the important feature of limited liability” (Chrisman, 2010, p. 465). In a general partnership, each partner associated with the entity will be held liable for their own business decisions as well as

There is also the concept of secondary liability. This means that if, for example, an employment agency

Liability All liabilities are the responsibility of each partner. In the event of litigation, any creditors can go after the personal assets of each partner to recover any debt owed. But since liability is spread out between the owners, one may feel less risk is being taken. 2. Income Taxes General partnership may also benefit from pass-through taxation, meaning the partners are taxed like sole proprietors. Business income is reported on the personal tax filing while business losses can be deducted to reduce personal tax liability. The partnership itself is not subject to federal income tax. However the partnership needs to file an information return utilizing the IRS Form 1065. 3. Longevity or continuity of the organization Once the partnership agreement is fulfilled, the general partnership may dissolve. A buy/sell agreement may be included in the articles of the partnership to allow the

A limited liability company protects each partner from personal liability for certain obligations of the company. An important difference from other partnerships is that each partner is liable for the debts and obligations of the partners. With limited liability Company, each state has its own laws governing partners for these vessels. Some states allow only certain professions, such as lawyers and accountants to form LLP. Some states only provide protection from liability for negligence claims, leaving personally responsible for other types of requests partner. For tax purposes, profits are divided equally between the partners and the partnership is not taxed separately.

Liability- The general partner would be liable for all unlimited responsibility on all tasks and debt, while the limited partner will not loss more than their investment.

* The liability does not fall on one individual instead it is assumed by the business in a corporation. Individuals representing the company can still be personally sued in some states.

a partners that might end or dissolve partnership. One of the main drawbacks of a

Partnership liability tort can take place when a partner or all partners acting on partnership business causes injury to a third person. Cause of this tort could be a negligent act, a breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, defamation, fraud, or another intentional tort (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 538). Under the Uniform Partnership Act, partners are jointly and severally liable for torts and breaches of trust (UPA, 2010). This is true even if the co-partner(s) did not participate in the act. The joint and severally liable tort permits a third party to sue one or more of the partners

Each member of a liability is held liable for their own capital contributions, but each member is protected because debts lie within the LLC itself. In a sole proprietorship, you, Mr. Robinson are liable for the whole of Kyle Grocery Stores. I would advise that this is typically dangerous, both in the case of financial losses, and also in the case of a horrific event that may turn into a legal battle, which I will also explain

“Liabilities are debts: money you owe. Every business carries some liabilities—for example, ongoing payments to suppliers, rent for your office, compensation to employees, or fees for contractors” (Mancuso, 2014). Added liabilities may result if a business is ravaged by a fire or flood or if the business owner(s) become the victim of a lawsuit—for example, a patron, client or customer decides to sue your company after hurting themselves on company property. It is the intent of this paper to examine the role and responsibility of liability in different types of businesses from sole proprietorships to

Limited liability partnership (LLP): Owners are not liable for debts, obligations or other liabilities of the partnership which are a direct result of negligence, wrong acts or malpractice of an agent, employee or partner of this partnership (Bhattacharyya. A.K., 2011, p.5). However, a partner will still be liable for negligence, wrong acts or malpractice conducted by an agent, employee or partner who is under his / her direct supervision.

Provisions such as limited liability on part of auditors, increased interest for shareholders, etc. are part of the Companies Act of 2006 in the UK. This Act includes limited liability by contract with regard to such an amount which is deemed reasonable and fair in all circumstances (Coffee, 2007). In the last few years, changes have been brought in terms of the legal regime in the UK’s governance system. For instance, since 1989, firms in the UK have been able to incorporate, in that the firms can form limited liability partnerships, wherein they can protect all the partners from any kind of personal bankruptcy unless the partners were responsible personally in any kind of faulty opinion in terms of audit. Nonetheless, firms in the UK have continued to choose abandoning the joint responsibility option for lucrative limited liability regime (Hicks, 2008). The firms in the UK have used the case of Arthur Anderson LLP to modify and reform joint and several liability based on two arguments and these were – collapse of a major firm under the pressure of aforementioned liability may leave the market concentrated; and liability risk can be considered as a barrier in terms of smaller firms who attempt to enter a concentrated market. Within the context of limited liability, there are more unique kinds of liabilities which are deemed to be missing from the Act