Murse, Tom. “How Social Media Has Changed Politics.” About.com News and Issues, About.com, 23 Aug. 2016, uspolitics.about.com/od/CampaignsElections/tp/How-Social-Media-Has-Changed-Politics.htm.
Murse’s article explains the impact that social media has had on politics, ranging from impacts on politicians to impacts on voters. Murse mentions ten of these effects, most notably politicians being able to spread their message in a more effective and cost-efficient way. Murse offers examples of politicians who have used social media and he explains how they have been affected by it. Murse also explains the effect that social media has had on the communication between people and politicians.
Murse’s article is a useful source as it mentions
…show more content…
"Digital media shapes youth participation in politics: social media are changing how youth involve themselves in politics. Educators also must change how they prepare students to be involved citizens." Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 94, no. 3, 2012, p. 52+. Academic OneFile,go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=fjp_jvpl&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA310152713&it=r&asid=f602549bc6ebccb518bce6325c96943d. Accessed 09 Jan. 2017.
This article explains how social media has influenced civic engagement in youths. The article describes the new ways that there are for political participation along with potential benefits and problems that could come with the use of social media in politics. This article describes social media in politics as a double-edged knife that can do things such as increase youth involvement in politics but enlarge political inequality, spur activism but bring discontentment, and spread information but create echo chambers/ spread
…show more content…
"Deliberation or self-presentation? Young people, politics and social media." NORDICOM Review: Nordic Research on Media and Communication, vol. 35, no. 2, 2014, p. 17+. Academic OneFile, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=fjp_jvpl&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA396138 821&it=r&asid=fd12865ff81605e7e511baf658d1a69f. Accessed 10 Jan. 2017.
This source explains ways that social media is used by young people and politicians. The way that social media is used for civic engagement is investigated through interviews with Facebook users. Topics such as deliberation, awareness of self-presentation, and participation are described. The source believes that social media has not led to a complete reorganization in youth participation in politics and reasons for that were expressed through the study.
This is not really a useful source since only one social media network (Facebook) is analyzed and the American youth isn’t studied. Compared to other sources, this source will be seen as limited in explaining the impact of social media in American elections. The information is likely reliable and the goal of this source is to inform others about social media’s impact on politics. This source will be used if the effect of social media on other countries has to be analyzed/ if connections are
In today’s modern time, social media has a huge impact on political environment. How the World Changed Social Media claims, “ Such political activity as there is on social media is usually at a national level and is conducted mainly by supporters…” (Miller 142,143). Social media presents a national level bias. During the last ten years, politics has gained much traction on these sites. For example, campaigns for national
In the past ten years the way we as a people communicate has changed greatly. No longer is it uncommon for conversations to not be face to face and now more so than ever conversations take place through text. As with any change there will be and is push back to it. The conflict over the consequences of the social media dependent society have now intensified as a result of social media playing ever greater roles in how politics is seen and even conducted. This has been a major societal question since the presidential election of 2008 and the debate has been written about, discussed, and argued by thousands of different politicians,
More and more people are getting their news from social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Tumbler and many more, and candidates are using this to their advantage. This election is probably one of the first were candidates have actually used social media sites as their direct communication line to potential voters. Social media today had gone from gossip and family pictures to a location for political strategy. Thanks largely to trumps regular social media first declarations and its actually working particularly with the younger voters. A study released last year from the Pew Research Center that Marissa Lang cited showed that “Among 18- to 29-year-olds, nearly two-thirds said social media is the most helpful means of learning new things about politics.” (Lang, 2016). Even if the candidate isn’t the one posting the video or message in the end it will still end up on social media. For example, Trump had announced his plan to ban all Muslims from entering the united states in South Carolina not on social media however it found its way there and spread like wild fire. This sent those who were outraged to respond in disgust and those who encouraged it to share it so that their friends could see and so on and so on. Even if those who shared it did it to
Does Nicolas Carr, author of “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics” provide enough evidence that social media is ruining politics? The answer is a very obvious yes. Overtime, social media has slowly polarized the political perception of the American people. Social Networking is a new, popular medium that has changed the nature of political conversation. Therefore, it has become both a good thing and a bad thing. It has encouraged those who once did not partake in the political process to participate. Social networking is very useful to find out news and information ahead of the news media.. “It has become an easy way for political candidates to connect and communicate with the American people.” (Carr 1) While social media might provide the candidates with a form of convenience because it simplifies and speeds up the communication process, it also provides many ways for their campaigns to be easily and deliberately attacked. Unfortunately, what receives the most attention on social media is outrageous statements. Some candidates like Donald Trump know how to use this to their advantage. The danger in this is that candidates tend to use abrasive soundbites to grab the attention of the social media user. Unfortunately, the abrasive soundbites are often taken out the intended context. Other candidates like Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush did not come to this realization as quickly because they did not want to take the chance of hindering their image. They understood that a
Congress, 80% of our representatives use social media to engage with constituents. That has never been done before and is changing how politicians respond. We even see some votes in Congress made based on their Facebook feedback.”(The Economic) The Internet is like being there in the whole scene. Missing out information is impossible, a simply Google search, all the information is stored. When computers came out, it cost thousands, now it’s cheaper and faster. There’s tablets and phones with the opportunity to surf the web. More than half the candidates have some type of social media, either them or a fan.
Additionally to television, many political figures including Barrack Obama use social networking as a way to reach American citizens. Social networking is practically a right of passage among youth today. Political influences are in all types of media. Any young person that uses social networking or watches television is choosing to not pay attention to politics. “It would be reading too much into such responses to say that these two-thirds of young Americans didn’t value voting; they could well have seen voting as a fundamental right or a crucial choice. Nevertheless, without a
Social media has given the human race an unprecedented amount of access to news and information. However, the validity and vetting of this information is often questionable at best. The emergence of websites such as Breitbart, Occupy Democrats, and TheBlaze have given way to a constant stream of partisan
However, political communication has experienced a great deal of change within the past ten years. Now, politicians have caught on to using social media in order to connect with younger demographics of voters who are participating in elections and political conversation more than ever. Successfully integrating yourself into pop culture is a political
"You don 't get the chance to make America great by getting rid of everything that made America great,” Stated by Hillary Clinton during her campaign rally in St. Louis, Missouri to attack candidate Donald Trump from his previous diverse rhetoric. Political Rhetoric has been very popular in today’s society. Politics use this as a platform to criticize other candidates about important points that are essential to the United States and its citizens. Not only does others believe that political rhetoric is out of control but it is a negative form of art. During election time, the media and the internet are critical for candidates because it gives them easy access to the younger audience. Although social media is enormous in today’s society, this is the best way for young voters to make their voices heard. Scott Keeter a research analyst and exit poll analyst for NBS News stated that “Young voters have given the Democratic Party a majority of their votes, and for all three cycles they have been the party’s most supportive age group” (Keeter, 1). According to U.S. Census Bureau over the course of time the rate of younger voters “Dropped from 50.9% percent in 1964 to 38.0 percent in 2012” (U.S. Census Bureau, 2).However, the media continue to evolve with modern society. I believe that rhetoric such as visual political rhetoric helps the youth to get more involved with the political arguments while being educated and entertained at the same time.
The 2016 presidential election may happen to be one of the most memorable elections to have ever been. From the campaign speeches, to the Democratic and Republican National conventions, and even the presidential debates; Americans seemed to constantly be voicing their opinions on every aspect of the election, and who they believe is the more suitable candidate for president, especially on social media. The 2016 presidential election marks one of the more recent elections where we start to see social media’s impact on it. We see how presidential candidates use social media as a platform to voice about updates on their campaign as well as communicate with their supporters. With the continue rise in the number of social media users as well as politicians now using social media, how much has its impact had on elections and Americans outlook on the campaign.
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media websites have affected American elections in many forms. Candidates are now turning their attention to the people on social networks Murse (2015). They 're trying to draw more people like Millennials because they use more technology. These applicants are trying to step up and make a huge difference from the election of 2008. While in the running, the usage of social media is being used to announce what he or she is doing for the presidential campaign. For this reason, candidates, controversy, public opinion, social media and its 21st century media outlets have become the center of the 2016 election (CIO, 2015).
This is achieved through the influence of the media among all people. In accordance to Shelley Boulianne in an article written by John Wihbey it was observed that citizens who “consume more news media have a greater probability of being civically and politically engaged.” Meaning that social media, as used by e-activism can help incorporate more people into the political atmosphere of the United States. Furthermore, Boulianne concludes “social media plays a positive role in citizens’ participation.” This in theory could solve the problem of uneven participation rates, seeing as the use of social media affects more of the population and an extended variety of
The voter turnout issue directed toward the youth’s participation is becoming the topic of discussion. There are many variables that come in play on why exactly the youth, specifically college students, are failing to make it to the polls. Most commonly the older generations look down on the millennials as lazy with no engagement toward the political process as a result for low voter turnout, but in reality, the youth are more involved than most, just at a different angle. Digital natives, those born between the years 1980-2000 also known as millennials are the first generation to grow up with technology, evidently are more engaged with just about everything via the internet. As a result of endless engagement especially the social media aspect, issues are addressed, discussions are debated and it allows everyone to virally collaborate. Social media includes the latest trends, breaking top news and of course, politics. If the millennials, more importantly college students are being bashed on for low voter turnout, then what can we do about it? What are the causes of this growing stigma among college students and is there a solution to overcome this issue?
Social media has grown at phenomenal rates over the past decade, with its rise being easily visible in several fields such as publishing, business, and activism, among others. The rise of its use in the field of politics is well known by those who are on and off social media, as a result of increasing number of politicians using this global platform to their maximum advantage.
The causes of low youth engagement levels significantly affect New Zealand’s socio-economic future. In the past 30 years, voter turnout has fluctuated from a high of 89% in 1984 to a record low of 70% in 2011. The recent decline resulted with the lowest percentage of people voting within the last two election cycles (New Zealand Ministry of Social Development, 2016). The shortfall in effective campaign advertising through social media outlets is one cause of the low youth turnout, with insufficient funding from parties as campaigns draw closer to the 2017 election. With 37.27% of enrolled voters between the ages of 18-24 not voting in the 2014 election, (Elections New Zealand, 2017) parties must extend beyond traditional social media channels, to establish a stronger means of communication with youth voters. Low funding into channels which are more accessible to youth voters decreases awareness of a candidate and party’s vision, alienating potential youth voters.