National Firearms Act Summary

Lupica, Mike. "Shame on U.S.: How Many Tiny Coffins Do We Need Next Time?" New York

The debate over stricter gun laws has been ongoing in the United States for quite some time now. Individuals who oppose stricter gun control laws argue that the second amendment to the constitution of the United States constitute part of the bill of rights that protect the right of American citizens to bear arms, and any attempt to set up laws for gun control will be a direct violation of this (Hofstadter 10). They argue that the primary purpose of the amendment was to ensure that American Citizens had the capability to protect themselves against criminal activities and defend the country against external aggression. From a personal perspective, the recent surge in instances of gun violence in the United States of America indicates that stricter gun control laws are necessary for the safety of the American citizenry. Thus, this paper is going to focus on highlighting the benefits of more stringent gun control laws and why members of the public should support it.

As the population increases its stocks on firearms, a significant number of citizens are at risk of being harmed. According to statistics, “In 2000, almost 30,000 persons died from firearm injuries in the United States more than the number of deaths from, alcohol abuse, or drug abuse… [in spite of] almost 20,000 laws and regulations regulating gun usage to some degree” (Kwon and Baack). Though several individuals are in fear of losing guns as weapons for protection, a greater number of laws will continue to be useful in maintaining the security of citizens upon significant new laws addressing gun control. Although the existence of guns is necessary to protect bear arms, gun control laws help reduce violence, decrease the homicide rate, and help prevent accidents from around the globe. New gun control laws should be enforced to ensure the safety of the entire population, and most importantly to prevent any gun violence as necessary to help save the lives of the innocent.

The matter of gun control has become an increasingly controversial issue. Whenever, a nationalized tragedy ensues that involves gun violence, the question on what to accomplish regarding America’s gun control takes center stage. While exploring this topic, this essay will attempt to discuss the circumstances that prohibit a person from possessing firearms, also regulations to prevent these persons from possessing firearms. Upon reflecting on the personal side of the gun control debate, stricter gun control begins to infringe upon our rights, as citizens and they should concentrate on enforcing the current laws in the books, instead of making additional laws.

Stricter laws against guns should definitely be initiated in the United States. It is too easy for just anyone to get their hands on guns, especially teenagers. The events that have happened in years past is proof that if gun laws get more lenient then more people will get killed in tragic situations such as the ones I’ll discuss in this essay. America should learn from its past, and not only think of new laws to prevent these types of events from happening, but should also begin to enforce the laws that are already in place.

I will attempt to explore issues with regard to firearms regulation, what is possibly unconstitutional or just unwise. The bedrock of any discussion must include acknowledgement that the right to keep and bear arms is protected by the Bill of Rights. Attempts to diminish our rights should not be done based on analogies to activities which are privileges (such as a driver’s license to operate a motor vehicle on a public highway.) Few suggest that a church must have a permit to operate or that your home is your castle only if you meet some bureaucrat’s

Taking into account of the recent shooting sprees, the gun control debate has started again. However, people have contemplated: “Why does America need gun laws” and “Why are so many states disagreeing about the restrictions that need to be put in place for civilians looking to purchase firearms.” The reasoning for such contemplation is that the fluxuating strictness of gun laws have led to several incidences within states that have strict gun laws due to the fact that the perpetrators of these incidences have purchased their firearms either from black markets, or states where the severity of gun control is at minimal levels.

Current gun control laws lack in the ability to conform to today, psychological value of the person behind the gun needs to be of a lot more relevance when purchasing a gun. The Brady Handgun Violence act is one of the laws that surround gun control. NICS is a government agency built to support this law, however they are lacking in this field. This type of negligence can create a dangerous situation when you don’t consider the mindset of the person holding the gun.

Today the Federal Firearms Act would works for today even though it was used in the past.. The Federal Firearms Act is beneficial today because the government can monitor who is selling illegal guns. Having sellers to record the names and addresses of the people they have sold guns to can help police track down suspects if the person caused violence. Prohibiting gun sellers from selling guns to people can reduce gun violence because it would be harder for them to buy guns. Giving guns to the people who lack a permit also reduce gun violence. By having a permit, it shows the person is mentally stable and responsible to own a gun because the person has a clean background. The Federal Firearms Act will not stop all gun violence, but it can monitor

Keidan, Greg. "Talking about Guns and Violence: Strategies for Facilitating Constructive Dialogues." National Civic Review 103.3 (2014): 48-54. ProQuest. Web. 15 Apr. 2016.

The New York State Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 or SAFE Act was signed into law January 15, 2013. The law was written in reaction to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. This Bill passed the New York State Senate on January 14th, and the State Assembly January 15th. Not long after, the bill was signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo. With this new bill in place, New York State has climbed to the top with the toughest gun control law in the United States. Throughout this paper I will discuss facts and figures along with my own personal thoughts and views. Topics to be discussed will be; what is our Second Amendment rights and how is it perceived, the facts on NYS crime rate and gun violence, who has the SAFE Act affected, how the SAFE Act has affected those affected, what the citizens of New York are doing about the SAFE Act, and whether the SAFE Act has made New York a safer state.

The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 made it illegal to sell guns to certain people, including convicted offender and required federal firearms licenses. According to FFL’s “people who are under license by the Federal gov’t to sell firearms to maintain customer records”. This act was clarified by the 1986 gun control act. There are people who wanted to carry a concealed handgun here in Oregon, but according to them that ability to have guns people should need to have an Oregon concealed handgun license. Also, according to Federal Firearms License (FFL) that in Oregon firearm owners that if the owners are injuries caused by negligence they can be held liable in civil court. They can also be held responsible for damages in a wrong death claim if

With recent rise in mass killings with firearms, the call to ban them has grown considerably. One major portion of the debate is the role that gun manufactures play in the horrible events. It is the stance of the NRA, National Rifle Association, that the manufactures of these guns have no control over the use of the things that they create, that it is on the owners of these weapons to use proper discretion. The author of the article, Michael McNulty, argues in this article that the NRA has lost its true purpose and is no longer looking out for the rights of its members, but the interests of the gun manufactures bottom line.

Their opinion contradicts the opinion of some in saying that the right to have a weapon makes a society free.

In the wake of a tragic shooting in the Charleston’s historic black church, it is advised for the United States federal governments to conduct another amendment regarding its implementation of the new-stricter gun laws. Australia’s gun laws reformation can be looked at as a positive example. First point can be the prohibition of firearms trade for private ownership without any logical reason of what the intention for owning the gun. Second point can be the registration requirements for all gun buyers in the market so that all firearms that are being sold will be individually registered to their licensed owners under the government officials record. Third point can be the limitation of gun sales quota, given the fact that according to Griffin