Nature vs Nurture: Genetics vs Environment Essay

One of the most enduring debates in the field of psychology is the controversial idea of nature vs. nurture. Throughout the endless history of the debate, no clear conclusion has been met, only hypotheses have been formed. At the center of the debate, human behaviors, ideas, and feelings are being determined, whether they are learned or inherited. Determining physical traits, such as eye color or hair color, are simple because they are hereditary traits. The idea of having a certain personality, intelligence, or ability is under discussion because scientists cannot determine if these traits are learned, or predetermined by genes.

The human body and mind, when it deals with the nature and nurture aspects, hearing the word nature and then hearing the word nurture, someone might have to think about which one is which. Plus, which one contributes the most to what kind of person someone will end up being? The overall, nature cannot be changed and nurture can have such a universal variance of inputs that it would be difficult to distinguish which one had the greater influence.

The Nature vs. Nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. Since the start of the debate psychologists argued that you were either a product of nature or nurture, not both. Nature enthusiasts suggested that you are a product of your genes, while nurture enthusiasts suggested that you are a product of your environment. What if I told you, you actually could be a product of both? Newer research and experiments suggest that many human traits and behaviors actually result from both genetic and environmental factors. Your genes help to provide the potential for a trait, but in order for the potential of said trait to be realized, your environment has to influence

During the 20th century, there was a popular debate between nature and nurture among scholars. On the one side, some psychologists, such as, Arthur Jensen believed that genetics plays a significant role in shaping a person’s traits and behaviors. While on the other side, psychologists such as B.F. Skinner and John B. Watson argues that behaviors are primarily learned from an individual’s surrounding and derived by the environmental influence. But today, the majority of the scholars propose that nature and nurture are interrelated and they affect people’s development of traits and behaviors simultaneously. Therefore, in our research, instead of making an argument on which factor generate more influence on human development, we focused on the

There has always been a long and hot debate over the issue Nature vs. Nurture. It examines the controversy about whether it is nature (inherited genes and components) or nurture (environmental factors) that influences, changes and even dominates our personalities, behaviors, intelligence and abilities. Through an intensive examination, I endorse the belief that both nature and nurture influence our development and they cooperate through synthetic effect to shape our traits.

This is an ongoing debate and understandably so. I do believe that both nature and nurture play apart in development. Nature in my opinion I 'd suggest that one of the reasons that people believe in the nurture effect is that

The oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture discussion. Both are legitimate and it is very hard to decide whether a person’s development is prone to his DNA or influenced by his life experience and environment. Presently, nature and nurture both play important role in human development. However what remains unknown is if human is developed solely because of nature or nurture. . As of now, we know that both nature and nurture play important roles in human development, but we have not known yet whether we are developed majorly because of nature or due to nurture. Nature is the collection of genes in each human cell which determines the different traits that we have such as eye/hair color,ear size, height etc.

Nature verses nurture is an age old subject debated by psychologist. As of today, there does not appear to be clear cut evidence that nature or nurture alone is the predominated factor in how a person develops or behaves. It is believed among researchers that “nature and nurture work together”. According to David Myers (2014), “Research reveals that nature and nurture together shape our development—every step of the way” (p. 130). Mr. Myers uses the example of identical twins that had been separated from one another for thirty-eight years and after being tested sill exhibited remarkable similarities.

As we all know, the debate of nature and nurture is one of the oldest debates in the history of psychology. The argument between the two is concerned with whether behavior is inherited or acquired. Nature is behavior that is genetically inherited. Nature is thought of as pre-wiring because it is believed that we inherit our genes from our parents, therefore, our traits are directly linked to our behavior. Nurture on the other hand is behavior that is learned or acquired over time. Nurture is thought of as behaviorism which means that all behavior can be learned from the environment through conditioning (McLeod, 2007).

Since the emergence of human, scientists differed to identify important factors that affect human life. There has been much controversy and debates about which is more impact on human nature or nurture. Through all that arguments, it became clear that both nature and nurture a major effect on humans from birth to adulthood. Nature comes with a child from the moment of birth. The genes are considered a key factor in nurture development and growth. ''The genes constitute a “map” that guides the protein and enzyme reactions for every subsequent cell in the developing person and across the life course. Thus, every physical trait and many behavioral traits are influenced by the combined genes from the ovum and sperm.'' (Elizabeth D. Hutchison).

Nature versus nurture is a popular discussion in this world. Inherited traits or life experiences are believed to play a greater role in shaping your personality, For example, committing crimes. Criminals have been studied in the past few years, to determine if their actions are inherited traits. This debate of nature versus nurture focuses on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development.

The most controversial dispute within the study of human development has been the Nature versus Nurture debate. The root of this major dispute is whether a person’s characteristics are inborn, the results of nature, or whether their characteristics are formed by environmental factors, the results of nurture. (PSYCH 56). While many argue that humans are the result of nature or nurture, I believe that we are a product of both.

In conclusion, nature and nurture both play large roles in the development of humans, and one does not outweigh the other. As proven, nature and nurture both rely on one another. There is not enough evidence to prove one is more important than the other, making my hypothesis correct, that they were equal in importance. Without the genes we are born with, the environment would not have the ability to have an influence on human

Nature based theories believe mans behaviour is influence by our genes, characteristics and abilities, while nurture theories argue experience learned through physical, social and cultural shapes our future. This is what leads to the debate of nature vs. nurture that has been going on for over hundred years. This essay is intended to examine what is more influential and how that affects the individual and the society as a whole.

Millions of children start new lives every day. The process of their development has always been of a question to us. We are still completely unaware of the exact psychological processes that we as children go through. Human psychologists continue to question the dispute of whether the factors that structure a human are biological (nature) or circumstantial (nurture). Genes play an important role in making us who we are. However, genes are also solely responsible for the physical characteristics while nurture creates who we are mentally and emotionally. Through personal experience, I am able to clearly analyze and make my own conclusions. Although nature is an attribute to my physical characteristics, the person I am today can solely be credited to the the circumstantial experiences that occur in my daily life.