Nicholas Carr's How Smartphones Hijack Our Minds

Do you think that you could go a whole day with your phone in your back pocket without touching it? The author of ‘How smartphones hijack our minds” doesn’t think so. Nicholas Carr uses rhetorical devices such as cited authorities, examples, and uses statistical facts and figures to convey his view that smartphones hijacked our minds. These rhetorical devices are used to reshape your thinking about how much your phones take over your minds and how much they truly affect you without you even knowing. He shares many studies and experiments of students that have taken tests with different controlled variables to see if his statement is factual and that there is evidence that backs it up.

Smartphones have harmfully changed how teaangers behave in the standard academic classroom, making them unable to concentrate. The article “How Smartphones Hijack our minds” by Nicholas Carr provides several studies to show that the division of attention decrease when the phone is near to a person.

Surrounding the first portion of, “Our Cell Phone, Our Selves”, the author wrote about the early 1980s and the cell phone beginning, but I believe 1990s to the most important time frame. Notably, if she would have not added this, she would have missed a step in explaining the issues with the cell phone. The reader can conclude that technology was in full throttle, changing the cell phone from this large ugly brick, to something

Today, phones play a major role in individuals. In “How Smartphones Hijack Our Minds,” Nicholas Carr uses straightforward diction, studies, and figurative language such as, personification to reveal that individuals are powerless without their phones. Throughout the reading he explained how the brain grows dependent on phone technology, the intellect weakens.

In her article “Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?”, Jean M. Twenge discusses the effects on “generation i” with rising smartphone and social media usage. In the article, she provides multiple statistics to support her claims on what’s happening with the “i generation”, and generations past through social media use. She concludes that while smartphones have some positive social impact on the generation (like lower teen pregnancy rates), there has been real damage to the generation as well. I have concluded that, our generation has been more negatively impacted through smartphone usage than positively impacted. This is a strong point to make but, through my own experiences and, after reading Twenge’s article I find myself thinking about what smartphones have done to us as a growing generation. I have witnessed firsthand numerous downsides to having a smartphone that Twenge reports on.

Smart phones have become such an important part in our lives that we lose focus with or without them. When they’re in the palms of our hands we can’t seem to stop using it; when we don’t have

Within the essays, “Our Cell Phones, Our Selves,” by Christine Rosen and “Disconnected Urbaism” by Paul Golderger, both authors expressed concern about the usages and the path our society is heading down. It is remarkable that within 30 years the cell phone went from a large mobile phone called the brick to what it is today. If we are not careful with the cell phone and our dependence on it, our social communication skills will be permanently damaged. Cell phones have inhibited the way we interact with each other and the way we communicate.

Can you imagine life without your cell phone? Does the thought give you anxiety? These days, technology plays a huge role in our everyday lives. You can do just about anything on the web and a smart phone provides instant access. In her article “Growing up Tethered,” author and founder of MIT Initiative on Technology and the Self Sherry Turkle discusses the attachments people have with their cell phones, the web, social media, and technology all together. Turkle speaks with numerous high school students about the relationship they have with their phone and the issues that arise from being tethered to it. We learn that communicating through mobile devices and the web takes the personal emotion out of the conversation, and real life interactions

In “How Smartphones Hijack Our Minds” by Nicholas Carr, Carr communicates many subjects and information on how smartphones have a great impact on the human mind. Carr uses many rhetorical devices to get his message across and inform the readers of the negative effects of smartphones. At last, some of the rhetorical devices, strategies, and tools that Carr used was facts like statistics, imagery, and he also presented anthesis. However, he has many more strategies and tools ,but this are the main ones that made Carr’s points clearer and more informative. He used this rhetorical devices, strategies, and tools very well and they backed up his point in a sturdy manner and made it clear for the reader to understand the main idea.

In the article “How Smartphones Hijack Our Minds” the author Nicholas Carr uses rhetorical devices to convey his views of smartphones. The author uses evidence, description, and statistics to prove that smartphones hijack our minds. In the article “How Smartphones hijack Our Minds” Carr uses evidence to provide support to him clam. Carr says “Study found that when people phones beep or buzz while they’re in the middle of a challenging task, their focus waver.”

In the article, ‘Hooked on Our Smartphones’ by Jane E. Brody, Jane explores the current state of life about the interaction of people with smartphones and the impact of the smartphone era on social interactions. They published the article on January 9th, 2017 in The New York Times. The article profoundly explores how life has changed in the era of digitalization killing social interaction to a great extent and making life a somewhat alienation from the communication that used to exist before.

Approximately 91% of American adults report owning a mobile phone (Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception & Performance).

Although smartphones are making life in the twenty-first century very convenient, they introduce a variety of consequences from excessive use. There are parts of the author’s argument that could take into consideration some other points, while other parts of her assertion are spot on and very accurate.

Through this article it is shown that when creating an application it is designed to assure that people will be attracted to it. From the color of the icon to the color of the notification that appears on the phone. This is all planned in advance and it is manipulating the minds of mankind. Software design has to be reformed in order for humans to regain their own self control and say no to their cellular devices. Through personal experience and observing others I know first hand how obsessed the new generation is with technology, such as cell phones, laptops, iPads, and even apple watches. When having a dinner with friends we are almost always on our phones instead of enjoying each others company. This epidemic needs to end. Through Tristan Harris’ goal of encouraging the tech world to help people learn how to disengage more easily from their devices it is evident the seriousness of the situation.

Steve Jobs once said, “Every once in a while a revolutionary product comes along that changes everything. It's very fortunate if you can work on just one of these in your career.” On January 9th, 2007 Apple changed this society by introducing the iPhone, virtually putting the world in the palm of society’s hands. IPhones provide individuals with the latest technology, allowing one to do anything from chatting with friends to measuring ones heart rate. This innovation is excellent and makes society’s lives a lot easier by the simplicity and instant gratification. Although helpful to everyone, iPhones have become addictive. This current generation has become attached and less self-reliant, now relying on the technology of a phone. IPhones