Primary Source Analysis Common Sense Essays

The idea of a revolution lingered around the colonies of America and many had mixed opinions of facing their mother country or just being content with the unfair acts that were placed on those who lived in the colonies. Loyalists preferred to live under the unfair acts and wanted to continue to stay united under the king's rule. On the other hand, those that wanted to be free were still wary about a revolution because of the disadvantage that the colonies already had. A Loyalist, Jonathan Boucher, argued the need for a strong government because it was what God would have wanted. In contrast to Boucher’s argument, Thomas Paine, created a pamphlet called Common Sense in January 1776 and focused on the importance of the need for the American

Thomas Paine’s characterization of America from his book, Rights of Man, does not completely hold true in today’s American society. His description of social class relationships as well as just government is currently not a reality for Americans. However, his description of diversity is something that we do have in America today.

1. The problems that Thomas Paine sees with the British monarchy involve its straying from ideal government, the unjust placement of one individual above all others, and its hereditary aspect. The problems that Thomas Paine sees with King George III in particular are his personal transgressions against liberty. Thomas Paine, firstly views government as “but a necessary evil” (15), and therefore it should be both as limited as possible and also tied to the more positive society. The ideal form of government, thus according to Paine, is a simple republic where the elected are forced to be accountable to their electors (16). The British monarchy fails in all accounts; not only does the prescence of a monarchy at all eliminate the accountability of a republic, but the complicatedness of the British monarchy system makes it worse in this aspect than even other monarchies. Although absolute monarchies are horrid in that they give no power to the people, they are still simpler than the British monarchy; this makes issues much more difficult to handle in the British monarchy (17). The other problems that Paine has with the British monarchy apply to monarchies at large. Paine argues that the placement of one person above all others is an unnatural divide; there is no explanation for the division of people into “KINGS and SUBJECTS” (22) such as there are in other forms of division that humans live with. If it does not make sense to place one individual above all others, then such should most certainly not be law; therefore, from this logic, monarchy, which is entirely based on the principle of placing one person (and their relatives) above all others, is an invalid and unnatural form of government. Of course, some people could, arguably, have earned the admiration and respect of their peers through important action, and thus be deserving of a leadership position. In a republic, by listening to their electors, the elected earn their right to lead. However, the hereditary monarchy removes this earning of the right to lead, and Paine takes issue with that. There is no guarantee that the descendants of a good leader will also be good leaders, and therefore the government of a country should never be left to heredity (29).

In the previous paragraph, although Paine talked about the flaws that come into play in a government that is run by a single ruler, he then talked about how having a ruler may be inevitable and provides an example of how it may work. Though Paine doesn't argue against having a ruler to the fullest extent due to the amount of oppressive that is seen through having single rulers, he feels that there should be someone in charge but have equal power with other parties, therefore that single person isn't in complete control. According to Paine, " Let the assemblies be annual, with a President only. The representation more equal. Their business wholly domestic, and subject to the authority of a Continental Congress." This shows Paine's thinking on producing a government with equality. In this example, there will be representation from all aspects and people, so they can and will be part of the decision-making as well as the President. Thomas Paine's theory on creating a government with a higher power which is surrounded by equality can flourish due to the elimination of oppression, tyranny, and abuse of power.

That type of government in which he proposed was representative democracy. He introduces this idea by saying “LET the assemblies be annual, with a President only. The representation more equal. Their business wholly, domestic, and subject to the authority of a Continental Congress.”(pg. 96) Paine is indicating that the American colonies must gain their independence and cut off ties from Britain. He provides counterarguments and rebuttals to show that his reasoning behind America gaining independence is valid and crucial. He challenges a particular assertion that he has heard by some which says “…America hath flourished under her former connexion with Great-Britain…the same connexion is necessary towards her future happiness.” He rebuts this counterargument by using an analogy of a child thriving on milk. Because the child has thrived on milk does not mean it should never have meat, he essentially says. Britain has never had America’s best interest at heart, they treated the colonies as a piece of property and nothing more. Paine suggests that if America breaks its ties with Britain, there will be no need for Britain to defend them against the rest of the world. The reason being that if America becomes a trade partner that is mutually beneficial and adequate enough with the other countries in Europe, no individual country will allow it to fall because they would prefer to keep America free. He stresses that “A government of our own is our natural

Paine initially expounded on the connection between society and government and how a government's viability could be judged just on its capacity to ensure the freedom and property of its citizens. He contended that the legislature laid out in the English constitution neglected this.

He argues in his book that it was one of the biggest mistakes in history to bring a monarchy succession. Paine thinks it is very important for people to understand that man originally was in the state of equality, which means that inequality was caused by some certain circumstances which are in America’s case, the British occupation. Originally, there were no kings, until the ancient Jews demanded one, and from here it started. Paine considers this as a sin because god only should rule over the people. The ancient Jews asked the prophet Samuel to have a king, at first he tried to dissuade them, but he couldn’t. They insisted on having a king, until they had one. This story in Paine’s opinion must be known by everyone in order to understand what is happening in America, and why they should face it and stop it. A revolution must be held by people who understand the situation, and why it is wrong, Paine had the evidence to prove that the British in America is wrong, and that they must have no king and a heredity succession. Thus, they have to make a Revolution, which is the American Revolution, urging for America’s Independence.

January 1776, Thomas Paine published a pamphlet, that had an Impact on the world as a whole today. When writing the Pamphlet little did Paine know he would have such an impact on how society is run today. “Common Sense” was an outburst not only in Paine's career but for Independence for many others as well. Despite all odds against Paine, Paine was a leader and influenced American colonists to Break apart from the British’s rule. Thomas Paine’s pamphlet, “Common Sense,” led to the American Revolution, and eventually led to freedom for American Colonists from Great Britain, and paved way for the Declaration of Independence.

In January 1776, Thomas Paine wrote a 57 page pamphlet called Common Sense. Common Sense was written to encourage colonists to fight for independence. Most importantly, it united ordinary colonists and political officials by giving them all one common goal: separating from the crown. First, he wanted to end all associations with the British, most notably by stopping mercantilism as the American colonies were economically stable with or without Great Britain. Next, Paine wanted to end the idea of having a monarchy. He wanted to focus on logical and scientific reasons of power, rather than believing that the king got his power from God, also known as divine right. Finally, he wanted to form a new way of running the colonies. Rather than tying

Common Sense was read throughout the colonies in all classes of life, whether all people were Paine’s intended audience is indicated in the way his pamphlet is formatted and phrased. His intended audience was every single American colonist. Paine wrote his pamphlet in plain terms, with no fancy or political phrases, easy for the lowest of intellect to understand. In his discussion about the difference between society and government, he took the time and paper to discuss the difference between the two, the one for wants, the other for wickedness (Paine, 1). He does similar things throughout the rest of this pamphlet, giving detailed discussions of all his arguments, leaving little to the imagination or interpretation. While writing his paper Paine kept in mind his audience and focused on all details that not all everyday men and

The final points Paine makes in “Common Sense” tell the reader the reasons that full independence is the best option for the colonies. He points out that England is only a small island, incapable of defending herself and the colonies. He also states that a time of revolution is the best time to install a new government, with a better system than that of the English. Paine then goes on to outline how the republic would work, stating the idea of having a president limited in power by representatives from each state. Paine states that the only king of America should be god, not a mortal

From the beginning, Paine makes it obvious that he does not like the idea of a government. Paine believes the only value of a government lies in controlling our weaknesses. According to Paine, the natural state of man is to live without a government and its control. A government's existence is justified only to remove problems that would be created by this natural, anarchic way of life. If the government does not to improve society or actively causes some of the same troubles that would result from anarchy, it becomes their fault. However, Paine views the idea of a government as a necessary evil. A large part of Paine’s argument is devoted to attacking monarchy. Paine criticizes the monarchy as an institution and, in particular, its manifestation

In Common Sense, which was published at this time, Paine argued that the colonies should seek full independence from Britain. His pamphlet convinced many who were unsure of the purpose of the war and

In 1776, Paine published his “Common Sense”, encouraging American independence, self-rights, and to push from the British government. Additionally, Philip S. Foner writes an article saying, “...Common Sense pamphlet

Thomas Paine, a revolutionary, intellectual, and supporter of American independence from England published a book titled, “Rights of Man” which deals with the government shielding the natural rights of its people. Initially, the book captures the diverse aspect of this nation, but it fails to reveal the struggles that arise to preserve and adapt to such a society. Paine expresses his optimism towards the supposed perfection of American society, as one “made up...of people from different nations,” with certain expectations. Additionally, the time gap between “Rights of Man” and modern America cannot be neglected. Paine wrote during an era in which “constructing a government on the principles of society and the rights of man” was the essential objective of the country. However, modern-day America experiences opposite ideals and Paine’s theory no longer remains true because of the educational gap between the rich and poor, terrorism, and racial profiling.