preview

Pt1310 Unit 4 Essay

Decent Essays

After we received the POA from Harry Baharudin and Michael Wallbanks from PT EM, we did our official meeting with police who handles issues concerning 2 containers 40’ No: UACU8574173 and UACU 8479129 1. Problem of the two containers 40’ No: UACU8574173 and UACU 8479129 The problems of the two container that mentioned above is The category of smuggling have been met purely criminal elements under Article 102 jo Article 109 Law no 17/2006 concerning Customs. 2. Legal process and penalty Against the criminal act of pure smuggling would be carried out the act of investigation With the establishment of anyone suspects who allegedly involved and responsible for these crimes, then be passed on the next phase which is the process of the court …show more content…

Ranging from shipped by Monciale in German until to Australia based on the order of Breville according to the existing Customs document. Without the knowledge of PT EM two container that contains the coffee machine become part of 110 empty container that ordered by PT EM from Australia to Indonesia. So, the coffee machine is actually owned by third parties not belonging to PT EM. Only through negligence or carelessness other third party, led to PT EM as the party that not fortunate that experienced the incident. Therefore PT EM is not parties who have a motive for bring in the coffee machine to …show more content…

So that eventually acquired decision that PT EM and personnel from PT EM is not a party that directly or indirectly related to the acquisition of coffee machine in that 2 containers. Against our entreaty was collected the answer that we will be assisted to find a formula to meet the request, If it is filled with the terms and certain conditions prevailing in both these agencies. To be able to bring a response at the request of PT EM we need to have meeting immediately. Thank you for your

Get Access