preview

Rational Number Interview

Better Essays

Rational Number Report

Through the Rational Number Interview I was able to gain insight into Adams mathematical understanding of fractions, decimals and percentages. As a student in year 5, Adam was able to make connections using various mathematical strategies. Adam has an understanding of infinite numbers, for example, when asked how many decimals are there between each rational number (0.1 and 0.11), he answered promptly with “many numbers”. Adam was able to acknowledge that a fraction can be shown as a division problem, “divide the pizza into fifths and each get 3 pieces”. He was able to calculate by partitioning the pizza, and by dividing each pizza into the amount of people (5). Adam shows residual thinking when building up to the whole …show more content…

When the denominator is the same he is able to partition and see what fraction is needed to make the whole. When comparing fraction pairs, Adam is using gap thinking of the fractions 5/6 and 7/8 “both need 1 of their fraction to make a whole” understanding that each numerator needs one more part to make it a whole. In saying that, when comparing ¾ to 7/9 that have more than 1 to the whole, Adam said ¾ is larger, “1 more ¼ to make 1. 2 more 9ths to make a whole” He tried to apply gap thinking, incorrectly not understanding the unit of fractions. Adam has limitations surrounding improper fractions, not recognizing that 4/2 is larger than 1 whole and is equal to 2. He has misconceptions when comparing fractions with proportional reasoning is limited. When asked to draw a fraction he automatically swaps the numerator and denominator (6/3 to 3/6) when the numerator is larger than the denominator, when considering improper fractions, rather than converting to a mixed number fraction or whole number.. This displays Adams misconceptions of the understanding of the …show more content…

(2010). Snapshots of Student Misunderstandings. Educational Leadership, 67(5), 18.

Dacey, L., & Gartland, K. (2009). Math for All: Differentiating instruction, grades 6-8. (J. Cross, Ed.) Sausalito, California, USA: Math Solutions.

De Souza Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153.

Newton, L. (2012). Creativity for a New Curriculum: 5-11. New York: Routledge.

Reys, R., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D., & Smith, N. (2007). Helping children learn mathematics (8th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of'well taught'mathematics courses. Educational psychologist, 23(2), 145-166.

Shepard, L. A. (2006, Creating coherent formative and summative assessment practices. Orbit, 36, 41-44. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213738810?accountid=8194

Van de Walle, J, Karp, K. S. & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2015). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Teaching Developmentally. (9th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
Zazkis, R., & Hazzan, O. (1998). Interviewing in mathematics education research: Choosing the questions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(4),

Get Access