Roadmap to RtI Pre-K Essay

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a “data-driven and structured procedure for analyzing students’ learning problems” (Friend 49). The purpose of RtI is to use a systematic approach of increasing interventions for students in order to determine if a student has a learning disability. IRtI is a great program for school to use to help students but it is not mandated by IDEA.

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a three-tiered system that provides for increasingly interventions as students move upward through the tiers. The first tier involves all students on a campus. During this tier, all students are provided with effective instruction using research-based teaching and learning strategies. Students are benchmarked at the beginning, middle, and end of each year. About 65%-75% of all students respond to the initial tier of interventions and no further intervention is required. Tier 2 interventions take place in small groups and are in addition to the interventions of Tier 1. The areas of weakness are targeted, and instruction may be provided by the general education teacher or other school personnel. Student progress

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework based off the problem solving method that integrates assessment, and targeted instruction, within a multi-tiered intervention system. Implementation of RtI in schools is crucial to identify which students need additional intervention that will help increase their literacy skills, and prevent them from falling behind. RtI is based off multi-leveled tiers that are each categorized by the intensity of the intervention that is being used. The RtI framework is also used as a valued tool in monitoring and improving student behavior in the classroom through a model known as Positive Behavioral Intervention Support (PBIS).

In this webinar the presenters focus on ELLs and RTI. The first key word is the evidence based assessment and curriculum. The focus of RTI is preventions and maximizing student’s achievement and students are growing academically. The goals are for all students to meet their highest potential and use general education. Sheltered instruction is part of the core curriculum. The core curriculum is meeting at least 80% on each sub group.

The author of the article also ascertain that the practice is an effective one since the RTI practice is capable of matching researched-based interventions that are of high quality to the behavioral and educational needs of the students. The practice also uses the concept of monitoring the progress used in assessing need for the require changes in goals or instructions, and finally, the practice may also include the additional tiers for the purpose of instructional intensity or if possible even to be eligible for special education (Rose & Howley,

Parents play a huge role in the RTI process. The ASCA National Model (2012) tells us that the “parent must feel welcomed at the school and that their voice is valued” (p. 17). The purpose of RTI is to determine what students are struggling academically or behaviorally, and provide intervention. It is the job of the RTI team to determine if the interventions are successfully working (ASCA National Model, 2012, p. 73). Most parents want what’s best for their child, which includes a successful and positive school experience. Parental involvement is essential, because they can provide extra support at home to help their struggling student. For example, I had a student last year who was on the third-tier of the RTI process.

Response to Intervention, also known as RTI is a method made up of multiple tiers, to provide early recognition and aid of children with needs concerning to their behavior or learning. This process includes high quality teaching and general screening for all children in a mainstream classroom setting. The multiple tier systems of support, fits into the existing definitions for learning disabilities by classifying students into the tiers they require in order to achieve academic success based on their needs. Before a student enters their tiers, each student goes through a screening and progress monitoring to determine where they are in their educational setting. Once this has taken place and the data have been analyzed, students will be placed

In regards to the reading program it is appropriate for each special education and at-risk student. The reading program is implemented with specifications acquiescing to their individual education programs (IEP), and recommended reading levels. Although the students are working together in a small group in the second tier of the intervention process, each student progresses according to individual achievement based on goals designated in their IEP, and teacher recommendations based on their current reading grade level. The individual responsiveness of each student determines whether they transition to the third tier of the RTI process, or if they are able to appropriately progress at the current level of intervention. Presently, the two at risk students have maintained the status quo, not progressing sufficiently, and have

The new legislation is called Response to Intervention (RTI). The program is a three -tier process that involves the amount of instruction and the length of interventions given to elementary school students. RTI measures “student’s response to scientific changes in instruction that rely on evidence-based interventions” (O’Donnell, 2011, p. 84).

The purpose of this method is to closely monitor the progress of struggling students at each tier in the intervention model to conclude if further research-based instruction is needed. RtI constructs the essential resources accessible to ensure that students have access to and make advancements in the general education classroom setting. As an implemented school-wide prevention method, RtI involves modifying instruction for students struggling to aid them in ways that will improve academic skills (Gresham, 2005). Meeting the needs of students, despite their disabilities. The RtI model allocates early interventions and assistance to preclude learning difficulties from developing into something bigger. These differentiated instructions may be conceptualized as an educator’s reaction to varied learning needs of a student (Brown-Chidsey & Steege,

RTI is unique, because it’s a set of interventions for students who are struggling academically.

Non effective RTI models in middle schools may have to do with poor leadership. Isbell & Szabo (2014) and Little et al (2014) suggests in order for RTI to be successful, leadership at the building level is essential. Johnson et al (2011) further add overcoming implementation challenges cannot happen without strong leadership efforts. Leadership should provide teachers with training sessions for effective RTI implementation in middle schools. This also gives the time to collaborate with other educators in the school. Middle schools have to think about various extra-curricular activities, monthly assemblies, field trips, suspensions, and absences. Being aware of these barriers allows middle schools to devise plans to counter attack them before they arise. Little & Marrs (2014) suggests lack of leadership hinders an effective RTI framework while further indicating leadership that clarifies the particular RTI model being used by the middle school would be beneficial. Albrecht et al. (2015) and Averill et al. (2014) suggests allotting adequate time to record, analyze, and train staff on the RTI model is a barrier. Little et al. (2014) suggests implementing RTI is hard because educators have to find the time in the students schedule to complete the intervention. However, to combat the time constraint, Averill et al. (2014) recommends devising an intervention block as an option to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and high quality of intervention delivery. Other barriers include the lack of professional development, lack of teacher preparation, a lack of staff to implement the intervention, and questionable, quality interventions are barriers that may hinder implementing an effective RTI model in middle schools. Lack of RTI training is another challenge that hinders effective implementation in middle schools. And more than likely this will lead to

Data-Based Decision Making has a step by step process that must be followed, when implementing Response to Intervention/Instruction (RTI). If Data-Based Decision Making is not included within the intervention process RTI is not being used. Core curriculum is reviewed using Data-Based Decision Making. RTI utilizes Data-Based Decision Making at each tier level. This is how states allocate resources and establish school policies. Data is used by school districts as a tool to help evaluate the effectiveness of the RTI model. This tells school administrators and teachers what teaching strategies and approaches are working and those that need to either be improved and/or eliminated. Schools use data to take a look at their overall framework and essential components. Core curriculum and instruction are developed for RTI tier levels based off of data. This is why it is important to know what type of data you need. Know the why behind the data that you collect! That’s what Data-Based Decision Making is about!

The base rules of RTI is another guessing game of what the teacher will allow and will not allow. One major rule that is a guessing game is no passes no matter what for; not for needing to go to your locker because you grabbed the wrong binder, needing to use the restroom, or go to another teacher’s classroom for help in their subject. Some teachers

“Like everything else, there are limitations and biases in every assessment used. Some limitations include if the child was