preview

Safe Harbor Business Analysis

Better Essays

AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAW The provision of Safe Harbor implies to a special rule whereby certain conducts will be deemed not to violate a said rule (Eales, n.d.). It has been implemented by different legal writers and scholars at different span of time, that the provision of safe harbors is nothing but a scope of reducing the qualm that is formed by setting an indefinite standard. Another benefit as pointed out by scholars is that it helps in avoiding the formulation of precise rules that leaves no option in the hand of the judges to apply their discretionary power as to tough cases (Hannigan, n.d.). The provision of safe harbor basically is a combination of the uncertain vague standards with precise rules that helps the …show more content…

The current laws may also require the directors to pay the debt that has been incurred while the company was trading insolvent. It is quite a well built issue that law often requires the company to go for external administration before preferring the option of restructuring it (Sealy, 1989). The main purpose of implementing the provision of Safe Harbor is to satisfy the directors that there is no force being applied on them, where they are left with no alternative options in their hand. It is basically an opportunity provided by the law to the directors of the company which suffer from financial crisis to rethink the administrative control of the business and restructure it in accordance to the requirements laid forward (Stiglingh and Silke, …show more content…

The introduction of the provision of safe harbor on the directors will be having certain obligations on its implementation (Taylor, 2012). The Australian Institute of Company Directors stated that it has been observed where companies went into administration just to avoid the complication of trading insolvent. It further stated that the directors are quite concerned about their own liabilities and their decision making power, which basically obstruct them from choosing trading insolvent (Vadi, Vissak and Olivas-Lujan, 2013). The decision of a director of a company will not be applicable to the company or himself but to the future and present aspect of every person who is involved in the company. Most of the cases notice that the companies are placed in to administration even before it is required due to the structure of the current law (Wardrop, 2011). The Australian Institute of the Company’s Director further laid down that in its opinion, the application of the provision of the safe harbor would actually bring innovative result in the business sector, thereby resulting in increased competition. It stated that will place innovation in the market rather than making a company to struggle, leaving no option in its

Get Access