On September 1, the Senate Bill 4 (SB4), signed by Governor Abbott, went into full effect. This Senate Bill, to sum things up, the ban of sanctuary cities in Texas. A sanctuary city can vary its definition from place to place, but generally, it is a city that limit their cooperation with immigration enforcement. However, with the SB4, now it lets a police officer ask about a person’s immigration status while they/re being detained instead of when they’re arrested. Many arguments have occurred during the past months about these sanctuary cities and whether it is right to keep, or to ban. I believe that Governor Abbott had every right to sign that bill. The SB4 bill was very necessary.
Sanctuary cities upkeep criminals, thus creating and unsafe environment of U.S. citizens. One major example of this was the death of Kate Steinle in San Francisco.
…show more content…
Somehow, it encourages a better relationship between the undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. 70% of undocumented immigrants and 44% of Latinos, not living in sanctuary cities, are less likely to report if they were the victim of crime and 45% of Latinos are less likely report crimes or voluntarily offer information about a crime. This is because undocumented immigrants and Latinos fear police officers would ask about their immigration status. Though, these undocumented immigrants do not need sanctuary cities to cooperate with law enforcement. There is already an existing law in place called a U visa. This U visa is set aside for victims of certain crimes who have suffered mental or physical abuse and are helpful to law enforcement or government officials in the investigation or prosecution of criminal activity. It protects them and their family sanctuary from deportation. Evidently, these undocumented immigrants can still keep their community safe by interacting with law enforcement without living in a sanctuary city, all it takes is a U
“Senate Bill 4 is a piece of legislation that Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed in May and it aims to ban “sanctuary cities” by requiring sheriffs, constables, police chiefs and other local leaders to cooperate with federal immigration authorities and allows police to ask about the immigration status of individuals they lawfully detain” (Alvarez). The consequences for sheriffs, constables, police chiefs and other local leaders if they do not follow the legislation are that they could face Class A misdemeanor and possibly jail time (Mansoor & Pollock). “In addition, they can could face civil penalties ranging from $1,000 to $1,500 for the first violation and $25,000 to 25,500 for consecutive offenses” (Alvarez). Many people are against Senate
The term sanctuary city or campus has no legal binding but says a locality won't help the federal government hold undocumented citizens until the deportation process. In Cornell's case that would mean campus police wouldn't look for undocumented students to turn them into immigration authorities. "I think everyone wants the rule of law to be followed and they don't want to see law breakers be rewarded but immigration is different. It's not like they broke a criminal law they just violated our immigration policy and statutes and if they've contributed to the united states its not in the interest of the United States to kick them out," explains Immagration
Constitution. New federal laws have buckled down on immigration, however this does not affect sanctuary cities. Sanctuary cities do not have to follow the exaggerated immigration laws, due to the tenth amendment. The tenth amendment separates federal and state powers, meaning that the states have jurisdiction in sanctuary cities. Referencing the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the Amendment prevents the “federal government from coercing state or local governments to use their resources to enforce a federal regulatory program …” Similarly to how the tenth amendment protects sanctuary cities from federal law, it also protects them from the federal government attempting to force sanctuary cities to provide information. For this reason, sanctuary cities keep a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. In addition to the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, sanctuary cities are protected another way. The Immigrant Legal Resource Center assures that, “Congress cannot compel state or local governments to collect immigration status information in order to share it with the federal government.” The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy refers to the sanctuary cities version of not collecting data. Without collecting data, these cities are never in violation of federal law. There is very limited record keeping done in these cities, which works in tandem with the don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Therefore, the tenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects sanctuary cities from the federal government in enforcing federal law, forcing private information from the cities, and protecting the citizens of these cities with a “don’t ask, don’t tell”
According to Fox News, in the 2017 Texas Legislature session, Texas Governor Greg Abbott stated he expected the Texas Legislature to pass Senate Bill 4, requiring local governments to enforce migrant detainees at local jails and withhold state grants if they do not comply. Thus, sanctuary cities within the State are no longer permitted without financial repercussion. Senator Charles Perry, the bill’s sponsor, stated “President-elect Donald Trump’s election made it clear that immigration must be a priority. Thus, local policies cannot be allowed to undercut state and federal policies (Ward 2017).” Although there is a concern that illegal immigrants commit crimes and take
In “Sanctuary city districts brace for executive order to withhold funds”... by Angela Pascopella, she writes on how Donald Trump is attempting to stop the funding of these sanctuary cities. Sanctuary cities are places where Illegal immigrants, immigrants who entered the U. S. without the correct things to enter legally, are protected from the wrath of the government. The immigrants are protected by the county they are in, so that the federal government can’t take them away, because the county government has them under their control. For example, Los Angeles is a sanctuary city. Nearly 4 million of K12 students, or 7 percent of the U.S. come from undocumented families. Los Angeles and other cities like Chicago and New York try and protect
With important issues occurring every hour these days, more questions are being asked with them. One of those issues is Sanctuary Cities. A Sanctuary city is a city in which State and Local government do not follow immigration policy and do not actively seek and deport undocumented immigrants. Some could find that this Local policy hurts all Americans. Some could find this a moral obligation as a citizen of the United States. But by any means this topics has major implications to President Trumps policies and Federalism. And with these cities becoming more mainstream, question are becoming more relevant to other parts of government. There are direct effects on issues like cities health program, fight against opioids, and other local
First of all, the U.S Constitution protects these sanctuary cities. Since federal government and state government. If the city in the state decides to become a sanctuary city, there should be nothing in the way of them. The federal government shouldn’t intervene into something that they shouldn’t be in. Good relationships with local law enforcement and the people of the city documented or not, is essential in order for prosperous growth. When the people of the city and the law enforcement can help each other and communicate without fear of being deported or stripped from their family, then that city should be an example for all others. Protecting these undocumented immigrants from unjust Federal Immigration Laws should be one of the main goals. The government is taking the hard working people that have been here their entire lives. Trump’s idea of sanctuary cities is a bit blurry due to the fact that he only looks at crimes. Trump does not look at all the important things that undocumented people and families do like work the jobs that no one else wants to do. They do it efficiently as well, it’s not like if they do a bad job. Undocumented immigrants are actually working the fields putting all the food that other people use on their plates. As a matter of fact, now that Mr. Trump wants to build “a giant beautiful wall”, most of the people that will be actually building will
Those who donated may say that this bill will change the rate of crime due to illegal immigration enormously. This law has dramatically cut down on the immigration problem. With the paperwork to show citizenship now becoming mandatory to all immigrants, the rate of illegal immigrants will drop rapidly. Most people are for SB 1070 because property values could go up, and in turn better neighborhoods come to be. Politicians believe that Arizona’s governor has made a wise decision by signing this bill. They say that the chance of this being a negative outcome to the state on the issue of immigration is nonexistent in the states future.
The history of the “sanctuary city” designation is vague in its origin and definition, the word sanctuary meant something to those refugees, and to a lot of congregations all over the country who provided them with shelter. As for today, the term has become charged and in some ways toxic. With hundreds of cities considered sanctuary jurisdictions, five states and 644 counties have policies limiting local law enforcement’s cooperation with federal
Sanctuary cities are considered to be havens for undocumented immigrants who have entered the United States for economic opportunities, to escape violence, or other various reasons. One of the first sanctuary cities in the country was Los Angeles, which along with the rest of Los Angeles County is home to roughly 814,000 undocumented immigrants as of 2013 (PPIC). Many of these undocumented immigrants have never committed a criminal act outside of the civil offence of entering the country without the proper immigration documents. While there may be flaws to sanctuary cities, Los Angeles’ status as a sanctuary city is vital to the protection of not only the undocumented immigrants living there but the rest of the community as well.
So, what are sanctuary cities? Sanctuary cities allow undocumented people to live productive and normal lives without having official documentation. Although every sanctuary city differs in specific policy, they tend to share the same goal of creating systems, like state IDs for non-residents, that allow undocumented people to hold steady jobs and contribute to their communities. Perhaps most significant, they do not conduct unnecessary immigration status checks every time someone enters police custody.
The amount of illegal immigration has increased drastically over the past two decades. This is a very controversial topic for the citizens and government. The amount of illegal immigration is much more apparent in the states along the borders of the United States. States like Texas, Arizona and New Mexico have an influx of immigrants because its nation sits adjacent to the Mexican border. The state of Arizona in particular wanted to regulate, diminish, and enforce the amount of undocumented people entering their state from Latin America. So they decided to pass a bill, that bill is known as S.B 1070. With this new bill law enforcement officers have the authority to request for legal documentation at their leisure. Not only can officers request
For instance, Sanctuary cities are basically magnets for undocumented immigrants entering the U.S. that have committed a crime elsewhere. These cities are also making police jobs worthless if they are not allowed to keep these criminals off the streets by not asking if they are U.S. citizens. If police were allowed to question individuals about their papers and, cities would be safer knowing that there are less undocumented immigrants as well as potential unsafe drivers on the roads and in other situations as well. Thus making citizens feel safer of their surroundings knowing that there is a decreased chance of being hurt in some way or another by living in a sanctuary city. Also, without sanctuary cities, people would be a lot happier and might even make the moral of the community better.
Since American citizens constantly worry about their safety, they want to live in communities that are safe and have little to no crime going around. Meanwhile, as citizens believe that illegal immigrants cause crime in communities like rape and drugs; also immigrants have a fear that if they report a crime to the police, the police will then ask for their name and find out they’re illegal and will deport them. As the police track down on crimes that happen in communities, they need to communicate with the locals. They then do not report the illegal immigrants for deportation and they build a trust with the immigrants and help each other to keep the community safe. Without the existence of Sanctuary Cities, immigrants will constantly be fearful of reporting crime to the police and therefore, crime shall increase preventing a safe
do not comply with guidelines from federal immigration authorities. The guidelines state that federal law requires local governments to cooperate with immigration agents. The Enforce the Law for Sanctuary Cities Act and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 define a sanctuary policy as anything that “prohibits state or local law enforcement officials from gathering information regarding the citizenship or immigration status ... of any individual.” Some sanctuaries, such as San Francisco, passed ordinances that prohibit city employees from aiding federal immigration agents unless required to do so by federal or state law or by a warrant. In Los Angeles, often considered a sanctuary city, has a Los Angeles Police Department policy, adopted in 1979, to assure immigrant communities within the city of Los Angeles that there is no need to fear contact with the police to report a crime. Police officers refrain from asking members of the public about their immigration status. In sanctuaries, people feel that federal immigration authorities should focus on immigration law and that local law enforcement should remain focused on local law. In the past several years, many local and state governments adopted “trust acts,” consisting of community policing policies that limit local law enforcement’s involvement in federal immigration enforcement. The creation of the policies largely occurred in response to Secure