preview

Station Nighclub Fire Report

Better Essays

On February 20th, 2003 a fire at a night club took the lives of 100 people in West Warwick, Rhode Island. Known as the Station Nighclub fire, this event in history can be seen as a turning point in for building codes and building code enforcement. As a result of the fire, the NIST produced a 250 page report containing ten recommendations to increase the safety of buildings, specifically relating to high density assembly occupancies. Unfortunately, advancements in building codes and their application typically come from disaster rather than from community involvement in a decision making process. History is littered with cause and effect examples of disasters resulting in deaths followed by advancement in code requirements. These …show more content…

Developers are the first to be involved in the purchase of a parcel of land, financing and project feasibility. Once the use of the parcel is identified, a team of architects and contractors put together a set a drawings for building permit application. The local government jurisdiction then analyses the documents for code compliance to a set of building codes that has been created by even more engineers and government officials. Once approved, the drawings are released as approved documents for construction to contractors, subcontracts and engineers. During the construction process, the local government provides inspections to the project to ensure that the building is being completed per the specifications of the architect and engineer. Finally, the building is completed and approved for occupancy by tenants, who then hire insurance complies to insure their final product. The entire construction process is governed by a set of complex code requirements. Most typically from the International Building Code as written and adopted by the International Code Council. As stated in the introduction, these codes are the result of a generation of building disasters, which have been adopted by the States building division and enforced by the local jurisdiction. All parties in the process must interact with the code requirements, but …show more content…

Instead, it needs to primarily focus on a different way of doing things. One prime example of this is a growing industry we call “tiny houses.” This community wishes to build mostly code compliant structures in a garage or shop, then deliver them to site for installation and use by the final owner. To date, these structures are illegal, simply because our codebooks do not say they are legal. The result has been an underground community that has disengaged from the discussion and produces these houses anyway. Perhaps they feel that their voices have not been heard or they have been heard and have been ignored. A properly functioning democratic code adoption process would actively engage this community and incorporate their interests into the model code. With the proper democratic capacity, these groups can approach their local representative and approach the code council with a uniform voice, combined with scientific analysis of safety and livability measures, to get codes adopted that would allow them to legally comply with the code requirements. The process of getting diverse construction methods adopted and implemented will do wonders to build leadership capacity within this

Get Access