preview

Study Characteristics

Decent Essays

Study characteristics Alladin, A. et al (2007), Dobbin, A, et al (2009) and Butler LD et al. (2008) reported studies regarding the effectiveness of the intervention, hypnotherapy for depression. The age ranges for these studies varied. The key characteristics of these included: aim, population, sample size, intervention, method, study design as well as outcomes and findings. These were further analysed and demonstrated in the extraction table (table 2). The population and sample size varied within the chosen studies. The studies conducted recruited participants that were suffering from long-term depression or had recent episodes of depression which can include recurrence or the first attack. They were from the general population. However, …show more content…

Cognitive hypnotherapy for depression: an empirical investigation. = 8/9 The statistical significance was documented from the analysis of variance for the scores from the outcome measures. The significance was recognised by the group (.01) as well as when the week and group were in contract (.00) during the treatment and follow-up. The statistics are significant as the values are from 0 at the 0.05 level; it occurs when the values of the confidence interval are on the zero side (Alladin, et al.2007). 3. Meditation with yoga, group therapy with hypnosis, and psychoeducation for long-term depressed mood: a randomised pilot trial (Butler LD et al. 2008) =7/9 All of the studies was able to recognise the effect of the treatment using the values gained from the outcome measures. Also, the confidence limits were calculated, it was able to recognise the treatment effects was statistically significant. These results showed the quality of the studies and checked it was trustworthy and relevance. It was able to increase the strength of the evidence gain from the studies. Data analysis Narrative …show more content…

2008 delivered the hypnotherapy intervention (as described above). Alladin et al. (2007) use the intervention CBT (cognitive behaviour therapy) with hypnotherapy while Butler et al. 2008 used the intervention group therapy. This enables to see the comparisons between using just one interventions (hypnotherapy) against using the intervention with other therapies. It also describes the potential need of other interventions with hypnosis to increase the potential of improving the participant’s depressive symptoms. Dobbin et al (2009) were the only study that delivered their intervention and follow-up for a short duration (12weeks). Whereas Alladin et al (2007) and Butler et al. (2008) delivered the intervention for a longer period of time. Alladin et al (2007) carried out the completed the method for 6 months, follow up at 12 months and Butler et al. (2008) completed the follow-up at 9 months which was a similar period of time. The duration of intervention and follow compared due the involvement of extra processes and assessment that were carried out to find the final participants. Alladin et al (2007) included various more procedures for CBT and hypnotherapy. They analysed specific symptoms that can cause the reduction of depression in the participants i.e. ego strengthening, positive mood induction and many others. They were also able to use the time to obtain outcome measures at seven different

Get Access