In this assignment I aim to outline the advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness of the different styles of leadership.
Authoritarian, or Autocratic, leaderships revolve around a single leader, and those close to them, whose word is law and power absolute. Authoritarian leaders are confident in their ability to lead and to take charge. This means that they should be taken seriously at all times; if a subordinate does not take them serious they may lash out, threaten or simply punish the individual or the entire group to get their point across. They also prioritise the task over the individual and the group
This leadership style is best suited to emergency situations when the leader is competent and confident in his ability to succeed,
…show more content…
Democratic works well with skilled and motivated people because they want choice or the ability to influence one; the leader also wants to hear what people have to say because they want input and new ideas to directly improve conditions for the group.
The main negative of Democracy is that the leader cannot easily appeal to the minority without angering the majority because they will lose more support than they gain. Not everyone has an interest in politics or voting these people are generally happy either way or impossible to please. Another problem is that because more people are involved with leading the country secrets could leak; this could be personnel secrets about the leader or even military related secrets.
Democracy is like Autocracy because there is only one leader and they will make the final choice, however a Democratic leader values the opinions of his subordinates and will choose based on that. Decision making in a Democracy is very slow when compared to Authoritarianism because the time it takes for a vote is time
In a democratic government also depends on freedom of press and freedom of assembly. Freedom of press is the occurrences that happen every day that are informed or detailed through television, newspaper, internet, magazines or speech without adding or removing any type of information that do not benefit a particular sector. And also is that the people have the right to have their own type of press to express their ideas. Today, freedom of press is a utopia because every country has their own secrets, and covers important information to their citizens. With freedom of press, the countries will have a perfect government not so perfect but the people need to know the truth. The democratic government is a form of government in which the people, either directly or indirectly, take part in governing. “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” This is because there is no system that can perfectly order society. Usually the purpose of democracy is to prevent tyranny (the accumulation of
Democracy is mostly good for small and older communities, where the whole town or community can get together and vote together on decisions that
The concept of democratic government is one that has perplexed minds’ for as long as it has been around. The idea that people, not god, not a dictator, not the strongest man in the village, but the people that make up that village; are responsible for the decisions that are made and the leaders that make them. Democracy has always come in many forms. From direct democracy, where the people vote directly on leaders or issues; to representative democracy, where the people elect representatives to make decisions for them. Today, most countries have some sort of constitutional democracy, or a form of democracy that is bound by certain rules, written at its founding, that set guidelines for how democracy is to be carried out in this country. These can be considered the, “rules of the game,” so to speak, or using a basketball analogy; one cannot travel with the ball, but they can take two steps without dribbling.
Democracy is the type of government that is used in the United States, however, this doesn't mean it is the best type of government. In fact, some may say it is the worst form. Democracy is defined by many concepts, some of which are logical, and others that need to be revised.
The democratic countries give power of choice to their people so that the decision of the people should be made a supreme decision as the rulers supposed to rule on them and the people should have the right to select their rulers freely. Democracy in countries is dependent upon many factors and the main factor stood as the active
Everyday you wake up you take your life for granted. Around the world the average person has little to no say in their own everyday life. A democracy gives people the right to make their own choices and to have a say in the government. Democracy is a political system based on the participation of the people in which the entire populace is equal.
This reduces the chances for elected representatives to abuse their power. Also, citizens have the freedom of speech to voice their opinions on topics such as education and health rights. Democracy itself has many problems that should be fixed, such as not being able to guarantee that the some of the elected representatives will not be corrupted. However, other forms of government such as a monarchy has even more problems and are much worse forms of government as it gives the ruler all the power, leaving the people with no freedom to call out their leader if they are corrupted. In short, democracy is a government for the people consisting of people whose power was given to them by the people. For this reason, democracy is deemed the best form of governance today.
Democracy related to our lives by looking for the right thing to do, for every one of us have equality and freedom of speech, we could have multiple ideas it might change the ideology of the country, we also could related the democracy by looking at the facts. The facts are Free Elections, Political Participation, Civil Liberties, and Functioning Government. The democracy is one of the most common types of the government in the modern world. Which give us clear idea of who defied the democracy even in different countries. Moreover free elections could related to democracy by having free election that anyone could share his experience with the others and create an idea to fix any problem. Also this could direct a message to the citizen to know what the elections doing. Political participation, to each one who is adults and have some awareness of the social issues or votes. By participation we could have more diversity and through that diversity we could develop our economy and our awareness of different cultures. Civil Liberties, the essential of democracy and also important for the UN legally guarantees to all of the people. Civil liberties will include freedom of speech, because individuals allowed to communicate for their own different view in a debates from each others. Functioning Government, to establish a law that individual could respect and also to limited the power
Upon review of the nine leadership styles the following styles: ______ mostly closely mirror my personal perspective. Each of these leadership philosophies has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, each is congruent with what I believe is necessary to craft the ideal leader. Through the combined usage of these styles I strive to emulate the wholesomeness of leadership as I am continuously exposed to the nuances experienced by leaders. Furthermore, they are in unison with the most effective leadership philosophies of some of the world’s most notable leaders. Although, I find that the styles alone are not perfect and are most effective when merged. Of the three styles I’ve chosen as anchors to creating a distinctive
The styles and models of this book did a great job of laying out the philosophies of leadership and how to become successful in the business world. Beginning with the aspects of leadership verse management, Simpson elaborates on the importance of being a leader and the differences that positions hold when being a manger. Furthermore, discussing the keys factors of leadership styles, such as transformational and transactional leadership, autocratic, bureaucratic,
Authoritarian Leadership (also known as autocratic) has a high level of control. It empowers people to follow the directions given. It is frequently considered a classic leadership style and is used when the leader wants to take as much control as possible. It is mainly used to high demand jobs where life or death situations occur eg. Army. The followers of the leader will do whatever is told to them because they are lower in authority and are inspired by the leader.
In theory, democracy is a forward-thinking concept where the people are represented by the officials they elect. Since these positions are not permanent, the people can elect a new official to represent them better, which gives them the ultimate power to direct decisions in government. Monarchies and dictatorships can be oppressive, and their citizens can do nothing short of rioting or rebelling to change them. This is why more countries in the world are turning towards democracy. (Source C) The number of countries choosing democracy has grown almost consistently over the past 200 years with some minor dips. Despite the idealistic promise of democracy, unfortunately it does not always work. Democracy falters because of human complacency, economic inequality, and ingrained customs.
Democracy is considered one of the best system of government for people, also because if people disagree with the people they elected, they can throw them out when the elections will be held again. In a democratic system, the democratic power is basically influenced by the citizens of that nation because their laws are created being based on people’s views about their nations, and their possible needs. A democratic government not only takes into account people’s views, but it also respects their
Democracy is a governmental system in which the ruling power is not biased towards any group. It is a system in which the favor of the majority sets the rules, yet does not override the rights of minorities. The essence of democracy is freedom and civilian involvement in Government affairs. In a democratic state, acts of government must be, and are in accordance with the people, since they have the right to elect and usurp their leaders, and the right to choose the lines of policy. Nevertheless, democracy is somewhat a matter of controversy, and no complete expression has yet been given to its principles.
During my investigation for the CIA I visited several autocracies, some successful, some not. I also visited several democracies some struggling and some unrivaled in their success. Although there are cons of each system of government I have come to the conclusion that democracy is the only system of governance that would fit best with the United States of America and set it up for success in the future. Democracy is defined as a “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.”1 The United States of America is meant to be ruled by many instead of a select few. A broad participation in government now more than ever is key in order to get through these tough times and come out a stronger more resilient country. A democracy will not be as easy or as clean cut as a autocracy but it will be the right thing to do for the country’s success in the long run, socially, economically and to stay the strong world power that we are. In democracy the right decisions may not be made all the time. But there tends to be a happy medium that makes sure everyone gets a little bit of what they wanted in a democracy. Instead of one person or a small group of people controlling the country a democracy is a collaboration of many different groups and ideas. As a specialist in my field I feel like these qualities that democracy gives to the government is key to