ANALYZING LEADERSHIP DECISIONS McGregor (2011) of the Washington Post has identified that one the worst leadership moments of 2011 was when the Penn State officials kept quiet about an alleged child molester. According to Roebuck and Craig (2012) of the Philadelphia Inquirer notes revealed in the Freeh report stated the Penn State sex-abuse scandal demonstrated a quick decision was made to avoid scrutiny. “The crisis at Pennsylvania State University was preventable, as was made clear by former FBI director Louis Freeh in his 267 page report” (O’Brien, 2012, p.1). This 267-page report was compiled after 430 interviews and the review of 3.5 million emails and other documents. The purpose of this paper is to perform a thoughtful …show more content…
This was followed three years later by another “whistle blower” and the university leadership decided not to notify outside authorities. This incident was then documented to note that various leaders once they were informed did not pursue to follow-up. This unfortunate case is a complete breakdown ethical and morale behaviors starting with the molester (Sandusky) and the decisions made by leadership at Penn State University. This included maintaining a closed culture, where loyalty was placed in front of morale and legal obligations. It is clear that the attempt to protect the university’s reputation outweighed everything else. Additionally, the financial loss that would have occurred from that loss of reputation spurred leadership to make the inappropriate choices that they made.
ASSESSMENT OF THE PROCESS The decision-making process at PSU was clearly flawed and influenced in several areas.
Once the leadership at the university was notified of an alleged molesting case the
…show more content…
The Penn State case involved an application of a variety of leadership styles. Situational leadership is one leadership style out of several that a leader or team can employ. Other styles include participative, directive, autocratic and laissez-faire according to Johnson (2015). By definition, situational leadership involves utilizing different strategies depending on the circumstances and or the individuals you are dealing with. The process flows from a directive approach (S1) to coaching (S2) to supporting (S3) or delegating (S4). Additionally, the competency level assessments range from low (D1) to high competency (D4). It was documented through varying stages of the investigation that laissez-fair or “hands-off” involvement was demonstrated by the leadership because on many occasions they chose not to do anything. Secondly, participative leadership was witnessed because the leadership was in collusion with each other and decided jointly on their actions. Furthermore, an autocratic leadership style was displayed because no one challenged the decisions. It was a very much
Top-Down process that was not open to
The word leadership has a lot of meanings, but its meaning is unique to the person who is giving the definition. Leadership is the ability to guide, direct, and motivate others to accomplish a mission or task. It is the ability to make subordinates see their own potential in their abilities and supervisors recognize and respect it. Leaders are entrusted with building up those they lead to ensure the individual can one day assume the responsibility of leading others. It is for this reason that the situational approach style of leadership best describes my leadership style.
Leadership, which is defined as “…The action of leading a group of people or an organization” is used in many different ways. Most people think being a leader is mostly about being the boss, having people work under you and just becoming successful, but it boils down to more than that. Leaders are those individuals that actually utilize their many abilities in leadership and administration to help make a better change for themselves, the people around them and the goal that needs to be achieved. Leadership is not an expertise that can essentially be grabbed from a book or article based on leadership but instead it is one of those initiative abilities that are increased through experience and understanding those real life situations.
Leadership is the process of influencing individuals or a group of individuals by providing purpose, direction with the support of others, and motivating those individuals with the purpose of accomplishing a certain obligation which is helpful to all individual that is involved.
Leadership is defined in the textbook as someone who “get people to do things they have never done before, to do things that are not routine, and to take risks – and sometimes
According to dictionary.com leadership is defined as, the position or function of a leader, a person who guides or directs a group: Its synonyms include guidance, influence, control, direction and supervision. These are all qualifications that are needed to be an effective leader. All characteristics are not necessarily needed at the same time and do no need to be used for each subordinate. This paper will identify my personal leadership philosophy along with theories to support my leadership style.
“The Freeh Report” alleged that Penn State officials, including that Joe Paterno and Graham Spanier (Spanier), covered up Sandusky’s crimes (Ganim, 2013). Furthermore, that evidence resulting evidence revealed Spanier, Gary Schultz (Schultz), Joe Paterno (Paterno), and Tim Curley (Curley), repetitively concealed critical facts related to Sandusky’s child abuse from multiple authoritative, community, and general public figures (Ganim, 2013). In addition, it was reported that Cynthia Baldwin, the in-house counsel for Penn State, minimized the seriousness of the Sandusky investigation when she briefed the trustees (Ganim, 2013).
Upon examining the Jerry Sandusky, Penn State scandal, it is clear several university functions were impacted by the crisis. To begin with, several member of the university’s leadership team were replaced due to misconduct or errors in judgment. Additionally, as new members of leadership were appointed, they, along with Board of Trustees were compelled to enact policy to prevent a similar crisis from occurring again. Secondly, as the details of the scandal started to break the Public Relations and Communication departments were bombarded with media requests (Meerman-Scott, 2012). However, they were unable to respond without first obtaining President Spanier’s approval (Fahn, 2012). Subsequently, the Public Relations and Communication department’s
Leadership means the period during which a person occupies the position of leader. A “leader" is someone who brings a group of people together, and directs them toward a common goal. Someone can easily
Sandusky Case The Jerry Sandusky scandal is one of the most controversial cases that involve unethical practices and leadership failure. Furthermore, Jerry Sandusky was involved in a sexual abuse scandal against children. Moreover, this case caused many controversies due to high leader’s knowledge of Jerry Sandusky activities at Penn State University. Foremost, the unethical practices constituted in ruining the integrity of the institution.
Northouse defines leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.
Leadership is the ability of a person to influence people toward the attainment of a particular goal. Leadership is a people activity, not like administrative paper shuffling or problem solving. It is a dynamic force and involves the use of power. Out of the forces of leadership come four powerful characteristics: supportive, directive, participative, and achievement-oriented leadership. Although these types of characteristics are not considered ingrained personality traits, they reflect types of behavior every leader is able to adopt depending on the situation.
LEADERSHIP- THE POSITION OR FUNCTION OF A LEADER, A PERSON WHO GUIDES OR DIRECTS A GROUP.
According to Business Dictionary.com, leadership is defined as the individuals who are the leaders in an organization, regarded collectively. It also can be define as the activity of leading a group of people or an organization or the ability to do this. Leadership involves the establishing of a clear vision, sharing the vision with other so that they will follow willingly, providing the needed information, knowledge, and methods to realize the vision and coordinating and balancing the conflicts interests of all members and stakeholders.
Leadership is an approach for a leader to guide, motivate, supervise, manage, and influence others in different situation to reach a goal. According to the Pettinger (2007), the leadership can be explained in several situations. First, the leaders have the responsible to provide vision and direction to the followers. Second, the leaders shall energise and motivate the followers. Third, the leaders shall set and enforce absolute standards of behaviour, attitude, presentation and performance.
In the textbook Leadership is defined as ‘the process of influencing an organized group toward accomplishing its goals’ (Hughes, Ginnet & Curphy 2015, p. 5). Leadership involves leader, followers, and situation.