Writing Assignment #1: Business Law Case Study Jonah Barker Legal Environment of Business Professor Vaughn 08 May 2017 In this scenario, if the United States Government were to mandate a similar set of restriction and censorship requirements on Google searches, and other search engines, the legal issue that would arise through this new government policy is the breaking of H.R.491 - Global Online Freedom Act of 2013. The Global Online Freedom Act of 2013 was created: To prevent United States businesses from cooperating with repressive governments in transforming the Internet into a tool of censorship and surveillance, to fulfill the responsibility of the United States Government to promote freedom of expression on the Internet, …show more content…
The negative implications of this policy will make Google look bad, ultimately making other search engines that follow in Google’s footsteps also look bad. Furthermore, Google’s objective is to make the world’s information accessible to everyone, everywhere, all the time; a mission that expresses two fundamental commitments: Google’s commitment to satisfy the interests of users, and by doing so to build a leading company in a highly competitive industry; and Google’s policy conviction that expanding access to information to anyone who wants it will make the world a better, more informed, and freer place (Wilson, 2015). The policy operates contrary to Google’s mission, which would cause Google to lose credibility, thus losing customers and overall …show more content…
Government’s demands would be for the policy. Obviously, the U.S. Government needs information to protect the nation; however, there must be some restrictions for those who have “personal” information to hide. A possible compromise would be to allow the government to have access to information that would allow the government to prevent, suppress, and investigate criminal activities; fight against terrorist activities; maintain social security and order; and fight against behaviors jeopardizing social order, while restricting the government from “personal” information that has nothing to do with the protection of the public (certain types of pornography- not including child porn). References Miller, R. L. (2015). Business Law Today, The Essentials: Text and Summarized Cases 11th Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Kravets, D. (2014, November 18). Woman posts “love” of ISIS on Facebook, charged with
Mary McDonald, an 86-year-old woman, was frequently complaining about the high cost of maintenance of her house and high property taxes. She decided to cancel her fire insurance to reduce expenses. Mary’s daughter was aware of her mother’s concern about the property, and she took Mary to the lawyer’s office to sign some papers that would protect her mother. When Mary came to the lawyer’s office, she was advised that the paper she was going to sign was the deed to the property. Mary signed a document. Later on, when the municipal tax bill arrived, Mary McDonald was really surprised to see that the property was in her daughter’s name.
The plaintiff (Southern Prestige Industries, Inc.) initiated an action against the defendant (Independence Plating Corp.) in a North Carolina state court for a breach of contract. The plaintiff alleged that defects in the defendant’s anodizing process caused the plaintiff’s machine parts to be rejected by Kidde Aerospace. The defendant being a New Jersey corporation and having its only office and all of its personnel situated in the state filed a motion to dismiss citing lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion and the defendant appealed arguing that there were insufficient contacts to satisfy the due process of law requirements
10. Dan hires Eve to perform at Dan 's Club, but Eve later breaches the agreement to accept a higher-paying job at First Star Arena. Dan files a suit gainst Eve. The court will most likley: award damages to Dan.
40. Principle of Law: In this case, Esposito hired Excel Construction Company to repair a porch roof. All terms of the agreement were specified in a written contract. And the dispute occurred when Excel had repaired the rear porch roof because in the agreement failed to specify whether it was the front or rear porch that needed repair. Under civil law, two parties here had signed a civil contract in writing. Because the contract failed to specify clearly front or rear porch roof, Excel completed its obligation and didn’t break the contract.
Mercedes Connolly and her husband purchased airline tickets and a tour package for a tour to South Africa from Judy Samuelson, a travel agent doing business as International Tours of Manhattan. Samuelson sold tickets for a variety of airline companies and tour operators, including African Adventurers, which was the tour operator for the Connollys’ tour. Mercedes and injured her left ankle and foot. She sued Samuelson for damages. Is Samuelson liable?
There is a literal conflict between the state and the federal measures, so that it is impossible to follow both simultaneously.
In the Final Paper (Case Study) it speaks to the following case and circumstances. Knarles and Barkley are father and son respectively. Barkley is seventeen years old. They operate a facilities maintenance company that regularly does business in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. The company is based in Maryland. They have a number of contracts with building owners where they have agreed to provide building maintenance to both residential and commercial buildings within the three jurisdictions already mentioned. They receive a monthly payment of $2,000 to $4,000 depending upon the size of the building. They bill the owners for any equipment of a substantial nature that has to be replaced.
In docket number 14-28, FCC 15-24, the Federal Communication Commission released a document concerning the protection and promotion of open internet. The internet is essential for speech, our economy, business and innovation, making this a very important issue to examine. In a globalized world, the internet keeps us in contact and update with persons and events all around the world. This document deals with the Open Internet Order, which, “prohibits blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization” of the internet (FCC 3). These objectives are aimed at keeping the internet open for users, and providing a functioning medium for business and communication alike. After the Federal Communication Commission adopted these goals of maintaining
Elizabeth Blackwell showed herself as a dedicated and diligent doctor during five years of work in Neurological Associates, and made a significant contribution to the profit margin of the partnership. The partners were delighted with hiring Blackwell in 2005 and they introduced her to medical physicians at a conference. But the referral base Blackwell went through was not the result of that investment by the partnership but instead it was the evidence of her professionalism in neurological sphere.
The Internet’s continuous advancement has produced the need for an on-going debate on whether or not the government should have the power to control the Internet. The idea of the government having control over what each country’s citizens can see on the Internet is also called Internet Censorship. Internet Censorship “is the control or suppression of the publishing of, or access to information on the Internet.” Internet Censorship varies from country to country depending on each country’s current usage and philosophy of how it should be used. (toptenreviews.com) Currently, there are ten countries including
This course has been about making good arguments and evaluating their effectiveness. The debate on the government’s role in regulating the internet is filled with many different opinions and viewpoints. I will need the knowledge I have gained in this course to sort through these claims, and create my own arguments. The title of Chapter 27 in “Everything’s an Argument” is “How Has the Internet Changed the Meaning of Privacy?” The chapter discusses many parts of the internet and privacy, including government surveillance. My topic goes further than just government surveillance: should the government actually regulate information from the internet? The internet has become an integral part of our society, and many of us will use it
Google was losing shares and internet users in the China market due to their lack of conforming to the censorship. They decided their core values still applied to the company but the main way they would be able to apply their product was to add another stipulation in their values. They determined it was also important to “be responsive to local conditions.” This means it seemed egotistical to try and change the Chinese viewpoint with their program. They instead changed their product to match the
In 2011, several people started a “Don’t Filter Me project.” They wanted to remove the web filters on the school computers that blocked several educational sites. They filed lawsuits and demanded that they unblock these sites and take away the web filters. Also another group of people petitioned the Supreme Court to strike down the Communications Decency Act in Reno v. ACLU in 1997. As a result, the court granted the “highest level of First Amendment protection to the internet.” Also in 2004, the Supreme Court “announced that it will not hear government’s appeal of a ban on the Child Online Protection Act.” They thought of this as a violation of the First Amendment (Internet Censorship 1).
The freedom of speech that was possible on the Internet could now be subjected to governmental approvals. For example, China is attempting to restrict political expression, in the name of security and social stability. It requires users of the Internet and electronic mail (e-mail) to register, so that it may monitor their activities. In the United Kingdom, state secrets and personal attacks are off limits on the Internet. Laws are strict and the government is extremely interested in regulating the Intern et with respect to these issues.10 Laws intended for other types of communication will not necessarily apply in this medium.
What are some of the effects government regulation of the Internet might have on Google’s operations?