Choice #2: Happy Hamburger Analysis Conducting financial analysis for firms can be an important avenue to understand financial stability or risk. Utilizing specific metrics and comparing them to like industries allows for an understanding of the viability and stability of the firm among its competitors. Analyzing historical data and translating this information into specific ratios allows for a strong comparison among organizations on the same level. Presented is a financial analysis of Happy Hamburger Company with specific examination of the firm’s strengths and weaknesses based upon current ratio, day’s sales outstanding, inventory turnover, fixed asset turnover, total asset turnover return on sales, return on assets, return on equity, and debt ratio.
Current Ratio The current ratio reveals the firm’s ability to quickly convert assets into cash or liquid. The calculation of this ration consists of current assets divided by current liabilities. In this instance the definition of current assets is cash, marketable securities, receivables, inventories, and pre-payments (Fleming, 1986). And current liabilities encompass accounts payables, current debt and other current liabilities. Due to the fact that inventories can sometimes bog down the current ratio, the acid test can be performed to obtain a more rigid liquidity measure of the firm. This measure is calculated by dividing cash plus accounts receivables by current liabilities. This is a good measure because it
The liquidity of firm can be measured by computing certain ratio’s such as current ratio and acid ratio. For measuring Target Corporation’s 2014 liquidity; the firm’s current ratio and the acid ratio is computed. The company’s current ratio is 0.91 times which is computed by comparing current asset ($11, 573,000) with current liabilities ($12,777, 000) of the year 2014 (TGT Company Financial, n.d). The firm’s acid ratio is 0.26 times which is computed by deducting inventory ($8,278,000) from current assets. The inventory is deducted from current assets because the company has not received any money for the unfinished good or from unsold inventory worth ($8,278,000). To analyze the Target Corporation’s liquidity trend in 2014; the current ratio and acid ratio of 2014 is compared with the 2015’s ratios. In 2015, the firm’s current ratio was 1.20 times and the acid ratio was 0.45 times. These liquidity ratios reflect that the firm’s liquidity was better in 2015 than 2014. (See Table 1).
B. Acid Test Ratio: Determining the volume of short-term assets to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory is the purpose for the Acid Test Ratio. Numbers below 1 could mean liabilities cannot be paid. A dive from 0.64
Current assets - Cash and other resources that companies reasonably expect to convert to cash or use up within one year or the operating cycle, whichever is longer. Current liabilities - Obligations that a company reasonably expects to pay within the next year or operating cycle, whichever is longer. Current ratio - A measure used to evaluate a company's liquidity and short-term debt-paying ability; computed as current assets divided by current liabilities. Debt to total assets ratio - Measures the percentage of total financing provided by creditors; computed as total debt divided by total assets. Earnings per share (EPS) - A measure of the net income earned on each share of common stock; computed as net income minus preferred stock dividends divided by the average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Economic entity assumption - An assumption that every economic entity can be separately identified and accounted for. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) - The primary accounting standard-setting body in the United States.
An organization’s current ratio shows how liquid the assets of the agency are by comparison to the short term debts that the agency must pay to continue its operations. This ratio is calculated by taking the assets that can be converted to cash within a year (current assets) and dividing it by the liabilities that are either currently due or will become due within a year (current liabilities). The current ratio, ideally, should be at
Liquidity is important for any firm as it is an assessment of the ability to pay its' liabilities in the short term. There are two main liquidity ratios: the current and the quick ratio. The current ratios divides the current assets by the current liabilities to assess how many times the current assets can pay the current liabilities (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). Traditional ratios are usually in the region of 1.5, but this may vary depending on the industry and nature of the business (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). The current ratio is shown in table 1.
Current Ratio: Current ratio measures the capability of the company in paying current liability. Higher the current ratio, better the liquidity position of the company. Generally, a current
This ratio indicates whether it can respond to the current liabilities by using current assets. As many times, we can cover short-term obligations, as better for the company. This indicates that significant and high improvement in the liquidity. The increase in the current ratio 11.5 % will result in an increase in current assets where the current liabilities increased by 2.1%.
The current ratio shows the level to which the rights of short-term creditors are covered by assets that are expected to be changed to cash in a period consistent to the maturity of the liabilities.
To calculate the current ratio, which is one of the most popular liquidity ratios you divide all of firms current assets by all of its current liabilities. McDonalds has $1,819.3 (*everything is in millions for McDonalds) of current assets and $2,248.3 in current liabilities making the firms current ratio .81. In 2005 Wendys has current assets of $266,353 and current liabilities of $296,687 making their current ratio .90. Current ratios are used to represent good liquidity and financial health. Since current ratios vary from industry to industry, the industry average determines if a firms current ratio is up to par, strength or a weakness. In any event if the current ratio is less than the industry average than an analyst or individual interested in investing might wonder why the firm isn't
Also, according to its leverage ratios, the company’s debts are not only very high, but are also increasing. Its decreasing TIE ratio indicates that its capability to pay interests is decreasing. The company’s efficiency ratios indicate that despite the fact that its fixed assets are increasingly being utilized to generate sales during the years 1990-1991 as indicated by its increasing fixed asset turnover ratio, the decreasing total assets turnover indicate that overall the company’s total assets are not efficiently being put to use. Thus, as a whole its asset management is becoming less efficient. Last but not the least, based on its profitability ratios, the company’s ability to make profit is decreasing.
In this paper I will be analyzing the financial statements of Kroger and Costco. It is my job to compare and contrast the two companies’ based on their liquidity, solvency, and profitability. This will be done by integrating the concepts I have been introduced to throughout the course by using appropriate ratios and current accounting principles. I chose Kroger Company since it is an American retailer that was rated the country’s largest supermarket chain by revenue and second-largest general retailer. Kroger maintains markets in 34 states with over 2,600 supermarkets and multi-department stores. Also, I chose Costco since it is the third largest retailer in the United States falling right behind Kroger.
Current Ratio is the measure of short-term liquidity. It indicates that the ability of an entity to meet its
The current ratio lets one know what is exactly happening in the business at the present time. The current ratio is defined as current assets such as accounts receivables, inventories any type of work in progress or cash that are divided by the business current liabilities. Business liabilities can consist of many things such as insurance on building, employee insurance these liabilities way heavy on any type of business especially one that is large as Landry’s Restaurant.
These ratios help company in determining its capability to pay short-term debts. Liquidity ratios inform about, how quickly a firm can obtain cash by liquidating its current assets in order to pay its liabilities. General liquidity ratios are: current ratio and quick ratio. Current ration can be obtain by dividing company’s current assets by its’ current liabilities. Generally a current ratio of two is considered as good (Cleverley et al., 2011). Quick ratio also known as acid test determines company’s liabilities that need to be fulfilled on urgent basis. Quick ratio can be obtained by dividing quick assets by current liabilities. Quick ratio is considered as stricter because it excludes inventories from current assets. Generally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered as good for the company. Higher quick
CURRENT RATIO show a company’s ability to pay its current obligations that is company’s liquidity. The current ratio position is lower for Honda at 0.33 than for Toyota at 1.22 in 2010. Honda has a large portion of receivables in assets both in trade, notes receivables and finance receivables. It has a huge portion of cash as well. This indicates the company has no problem in terms of generating a positive influx of assets. But in terms of liabilities it has a large portion of short term debt which makes almost 1/3rd of total Current liabilities. Also there is a significant portion of Long Term debt. The higher level of liabilities in the denominator reduces the overall ratio.