This essay is designed to present one course documentary given throughout the module and discuss how its technical and thematic innovation has contributed to the impact of making for your Final Group Project.
The age of stupid is a British drama-animation documentary hybrid directed by Franny Armstrong in 2009 and produced by Lizzie Gillet. , it revolves around climate change
« Pete Postlethwaite plays the last guy alive in a post-apocalyptic, climate-fried world, introducing a preserved video archive of news clips and interviews filmed way back in the first decade of the 21st century. »(Bradshaw,2009)
The story explains how Pete is a lonely man in the crushed universe of 2055, watching chronicle footage from the mid-to-late 2000s
…show more content…
These six stories take the sort of joining story pieces that give insights with respect to the lives of bona fide people around the year 2008, and switch the film's record structure from fiction to truth. Despite the encompassing record in 2055, the news cuts and the account footage of the six individual stories, the motion pictures fuses stimulated pieces and brief gatherings with Mark Lynas and George Monbiot, made for the film.
Armstrong's boundless film pulls together a dissimilar accumulation of witnesses, including a heartily unrepentant oil official in New Orleans, who is in any case demonstrated getting to be intelligent after Katrina demolished all that he possessed - perceiving how political ineptitude and inaction can introduce fiasco.
Franny Armstrong's low-budget plan environmental change documentary is now and then crude. Some may take that its science fiction premise as pretty irritating. despite the fact that the energy, desperation and punch of this harsh and-prepared film is sufficiently genuine. It's reviving as well. The silver screen and its orderly media-remark industry seem to have unending space for each kind of easily fair immateriality truth be told and fiction. There ought to be space for a paper on the most screamingly essential issue that we as a whole now
New generation is one of the stories of Apricot Jam, “written by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, presents a microcosm of the Russian tragedy. Vozdvizhensky is an honorable and innocent soul who went through the effects of Betrayel. Vozdvizhensky an engineer professor at provincial college is the casualty of this brateyal in the story of “New generation”. All these unfurl in the story that unfolds in the trials of wreckers in the midst of tech intellectual elite.
In the book “Overthrow” Stephen Kinzer breaks down the three different kinds of interference that the United States used to overthrow 14 countries. At the beginning of the book, we see that the United States overthrew Hawaii, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines because of their imperialistic grounds. The United States overthrew this countries to expand its power and also because they wanted to protect American businesses. In the second section of the book Kinzer discusses how America overthrew leaders that they felt were leaning towards communism; countries such as Iran, Chile, South Vietnamese, and Guatemala were some of these countries that got overthrown. Threats of communism was either misinterpreted or a veil to disguise imperialist
Although not often enough, sometimes the Hollywood industry successfully produces a masterful work of film that persuades us to reflect upon our lives in the society. These introspective films shine a revealing spotlight on the outside forces such as the media, which seek to manipulate our lives. One such film is The Truman Show (1998), a satirical social science motion picture, brilliantly conceived by writer Andrew Niccol, directed by Peter Weir, and perfectly executed by Hollywood actor, Jim Carrey. The film, although highly cathartic serves a nobler purpose of edifying on some philosophical concepts such as truth, reality, and freedom. The themes and settings explored in The Truman Show are an effective precursor to highlight and explain some of the cultural practices that have pervaded the contemporary society. In an era of advanced technology, social media, and popular reality television shows, it is difficult to discern what is genuine and what is crafted for audience consumption. This paper seeks to explore the philosophical depths of this fascinating film and how its titular character challenges, and ultimately escapes the contrived world of absurdity and falsehood.
Article Three – Author: David Bordwell / Title of Article: The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film
The Troubled Man Louie Zamperini a name that should go down in history. Louie could run a mile in 4:07.9 (indoors). He survived 47 days lost at sea, on a raft with 2 other people. He also survived 4 POW camps. In the book Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand Louie Zamperini appears to be very determined and resourceful.
Gung Ho, by Ken Blanchard and Sheldon Bowles was a wonderful book that discussed many important factors involved in making a company truly successful. It had a good storyline to help to tell the story of Gung Ho. When I first picked up the book to read it I really had no idea what to expect to learn from the book. The points that were made in this book were very simple and common sense principles. I say that these principles are simple, but many companies do not think of these little things when running a large business. They try to go “by the book” and get too caught up in sticking to their rules and regulations. Sometimes you just have to use a little common sense when running a business.
This film highlights the flaws of humanity in a western world. The films ability to touch on topics of classism, prostitution, and alcoholism makes the content mature and unlike typical western films. This revolutionary and innovative western created a foundation for many future films. The sophistication of the content, and lack of adherence to the production code makes this film an “adult”
In Jean-Louis Comolli and Jean Narboni’s essay “Cinema/Ideology/Criticism,” they put forward the central argument that film is a commercial product in the capitalist system and therefore also the unconscious instrument of the dominant ideology which produces it. In opposition to the classic film theory that applauds camera as an impartial device to reproduce reality, they argue that what the camera reproduces is merely a refraction of the prevailing ideology. Therefore, the primary and political task for filmmakers is to disrupt this replication of the world as self-evident and the function of film criticism is to identify and evaluate that politics. Comolli and Narboni then suggest seven categories of films confronting ideology in different ways, among which the second category resists the prevailing ideology on two levels. Films of this group not only overtly deal with political contents in order to “attack their ideological assimilation” (Comolli and Narboni 483), but also achieve their goal through breaking down the conventional way of depicting reality.
In the short story, The Kid Nobody Could Handle, by Kurt Vonnegut, the main character of the story is George Helmholtz. He lives in a small town with his wife, is the head of the music department at the local high school and the director of the band. He is the most important person in the story because he is the only one, not psychiatrists, and foster parents, to make a difference in Jim’s life. Throughout the story, George is determined and hopeful, lonely, and fixated with the beauty of music.
“The biggest mistake we have made is to consider that films are primarily a form of entertainment. The film is the greatest medium since the invention of movable type for exchanging ideas and information, and it is no more at its best in light entertainment than literature is at its best in the light novel.” - Orson Welles
Although this paper uses a mainstream movie, at all times you should use scholarly writing and language throughout the paper.
Stephen King is a very complex, experienced writer. He has elaborate stories that catch any type of reader. In the book Stephen King On Writing he teaches us his experiences with writing and in his own opinion how writing works, from the inside out. He shares that the editor or person revising your page may not always be correct but to take the advice given and use it to your best in your writing. Imagination is only as far as we let it go and that we can stretch our brains to reach boundaries there were thought unapproachable. Although being descriptive is the ideal way to write, being too descriptive can prevent you from actually getting your point across.
The portion of the film that really sticks out to me is when they start to talk about the science behind the storms that make our winters the way they are.
High Noon, the shocking American film from the 1950’s, shines light on the true nature of one standing their ground when the world is against them. This movie was written to represent the Red Scare, when Hollywood members were falsely accused of being communist. These actors were forced to give names of others who they thought were “communists” or else they would be punished. If the “communist” actors gave out names, however, they would be ruining other’s careers. Some of the people refused to give names. Like the Marshall in the movie High Noon, these brave actors stood up for what they believed in. Nevertheless, the other members of Hollywood around were not very willing to support. They were like the townspeople in High Noon. They didn’t want to risk their own reputation and safety. In the film, Zinnemann successfully revealed the hardships of those falsely convicted, and exposed the hearts of those who saw the false conviction, but did nothing about it in order to protect themselves.
I watch the film expecting a profoundly political dramatization is filling a progressing discuss the Israeli-Palestinian clash. I assumed that I would hear warmed political talk and see difficult pictures from a standout amongst the most challenged and awful geopolitical issues looked by the advanced world. I was mixed up. There is eminent scholarly pacing in "A Borrowed Identity," Eran Riklis' very much watched adjustment of two personal books by the Arab-Israeli writer and columnist Sayed Kashua.