Tuskegee Case Study

This essay examines the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, wherein for 40 years (1932-1972) hundreds of black men suffering from advanced syphilis were studied but not treated. The 40-year study was controversial for reasons related to ethical standards; primarily because researchers knowingly failed to treat patients appropriately after the 1940s validation of penicillin as an effective cure for the disease they were studying. To explore the role of the racism in the controversial study, this essay analyzes the article written by Allan M. Brandt.

A review of the proposed participants of the study will ensure high-risk groups (if any) will be considered as per the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (‘National Statement’; NHMRC, 2007). While some of these high-risk

In the chapter ‘Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care”, focuses on the relationship between African American and medical community due to The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Even though the original study was projected to last only 6 months, the study actually last about 40 years. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study took place from 1932 to 1972. Researchers informed the 699 men infected men and 201 uninfected that they were doing testing on “bad blood” (LaVEIST, 2002), a term used to describe illnesses such as anemia, syphilis, and fatigue. The men were promised free meal, burial insurance, and free

In the 1920’s and 1930’s syphilis was very prevalent and feared among most populations. The U.S. Public Health Service wanted to learn more about this disease and they launched six pilot projects in poor southern communities. One project was conducted in Macon County, Alabama. This project, called the Tuskegee study, was a clinical study of untreated syphilis in negro males. The Tuskegee project was meant to discover ways to improve quality care for the black community. This initiative aimed at achieving greater knowledge of syphilis spanned the course of forty years, from 1932 through 1972, before it was stopped based on ethical dilemmas.

According the to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was conducted in 1932 by the Public Health, which included 600 black men as their test subjects. Of the 600 men, 399 had syphilis and 201 didn’t (CDC). The men were told that they were being treated for “Bad Blood” and didn’t have any knowledge of being included in a study (CDC). In exchange for their services, researchers offered the men free medical exams, burial insurance, and free meals (CDC). The study was called “ The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male” (CDC).

In conclusion The Tuskegee Syphilis study had left individuals in the science field with unkind memories of how doctors neglected the oath they took to save lives, how the government also neglected their oath because of the color of someone’s skin and the value assigned to their lives in the name of science. For forty years they continued to experiment with human lives as a mere means to an end. The Tuskegee Study was inhumane, horrendous and broke so many basic ethical principles but the most important consequences. The study has forced the medical/science field to construct several scientific codes that no medical/ science individuals or company should ever break. These codes which came from several ethical principles were derived are also

Medical experiments on human subjects carry a great deal of ethical dilemma. In the United States, there have been various experiments made on human subjects that raised the ire of many people in the society. Many of the subjects were subject to drug experimentation, risky operations and being infected with diseases just to know how the disease affects the body. One of these experiments is the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment conducted to unknowing subjects for 40 years.

The Tuskegee Experiments arose from a curiosity in the progression of syphilis is African-American men. In 1932, a study was set up, meant to observe the “consequence” of syphilis (Brandt, 2012). This was done despite the result of the Rosenwald Study in 1929. The Rosenwald Study found that mass treatment of the African-American population in Macon County, the site of the Tuskegee Experiments, was possible (Brandt, 2012). Six hundred African-American men participated in this study: 399 men with syphilis, serving as the test subjects; and 201 men without syphilis, serving as the controls. The experiment was meant to last only 6 months, but ended after 40 years when a story about the Tuskegee experiments was released to the public (CDC, 2015).

Failure to protect subject’s personal information, is an example of not complying the above two principles in the research industry. Researchers are in a position of dealing with a great deal of very personal information that their participants have agreed to disclose. Depending on the type of study, personal identifiers such as names, birthdates, places of residence etc. may or may not have to be collected. In situations where these data are collected, researchers may take several steps to ensure the confidentiality of their participants’

Our study will comply with standard ethical research procedures. We will obtain informed consent from our participants before they participate in our study. Our potential participants will be fully informed about what will happen during our study; in addition, they will understand the effects that our study will have on them and our research (Grinnell, Unrau, and Williams, 2014). We will not use bribery, deception, threats, or any other forms of coercion in order to gain participants for our study. The physical/emotional safety of the participants will come before the research; therefore, we will adhere to all ethical research procedures.

The Tuskegee experiment was a medical research project that began at 1932 to 1972 in Macon County, Alabama. In 1930s, there was no known treatment for syphilis, and Tuskegee experiment was one of the experiment that was done by the doctors form the U.S. Public Health Service to find out the cure for syphilis. In 1932, the Public Health Service (PHS) enlisted the support of the Tuskegee Institute and the Tuskegee project was started. All of the participants were black and poor - 399 men in latent syphilis and a control group of 201 others who were disease free (Nix, 2017). The people who participated in the study were told that they suffered from “bad blood”, a local term used to refer to a range of ills not specific as syphilis and they could get a free treatment.

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male, originally consisted of six hundred men, three hundred and ninety nine of them had syphilis while two hundred and one consisted of the control group. The men were all offered health care and survivors insurance, making it almost impossible to decline participating in the study seeing as most of the men were extremely poor.

In order to observe the natural progression of syphilis, the U.S. Public Health Service began what is known as the Tuskegee Study in 1932. The study was held in Macon County, Alabama and there was a total of 600 African American men observed, 399 had latent syphilis and 201 served as an uninfected control group. At the start of the study, there was no cure for syphilis, only medicine available to treat symptoms; however, by 1947, there was a cure, penicillin, but it was never offered to any of the participants, nor were the participants aware that they were not being treated with available drugs. The study lasted for forty years, ending in 1972 and ultimately proving nothing, only once it was exposed by a researcher. In this paper, I am going

Review Ethics boards should be considerate of the patient’s they are using to conduct their research by first having them fill out an agreement to participate in the research. This idea is reinforced by a field researcher who had to get the patients to sign permission slips before interviewing them and the research wouldn’t reveal their identity. The field researcher found this was an effective way to make the patients whom the experiment is being conducted on comfortable and willing to participate. It allows the patients to have a say on whether they are willing to have specific research done on them whether related to psychological reasons such as asking questions or to have biological research

The male participants were not properly informed of the procedure or goal of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Instead, they were pressured into participating in this specific study. In principal of medical-surgical nursing, it is taught that the patient must be completely aware what is to proceed in the procedure, the benefits they should obtain, and possible complications of the procedure. It is also vital that the patient understands this information, that way the patient can determine if they are comfortable with proceeding with the study or not. Although these African American men agreed in participation, it wad based on other ideas and premises. The patients were under the impression that they were getting treatment, and this was not a process