preview

Verbal Behavior and Verbal Response

Better Essays

Skinner, in ‘A review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal Behavior’ and ‘Selections from Science and Human Behavior’, discusses the idea of operant conditioning in human behavior, and functional analysis in human verbal behavior respectively. Both ideas seek to explain human behavior, whether in physical action or in verbal communication. Operant conditioning takes its root from Thorndike’s law of effect, dealing with reinforcing consequences that are contingent on a response (or specified behavior). Functional analysis, on the other hand, deals with the identification of the variables that control verbal behavior and the means by which they interact to produce a particular verbal response. In this paper we seek to look at these two ideas in detail, as well as present Chomsky’s concerns and arguments about them.

As briefly described in the previous chapter, operant conditioning has its basis in Thorndike’s law of effect. Thorndike’s law states that responses that result in a gratifying effect in a particular situation are more likely to occur in that situation, and responses that result in an inconvenience are less likely to occur again in that situation. Operant conditioning hence involves a reinforcing consequence that is contingent on a response (specified behavior). As a result the operant, which is a reference to the class of responses that result in the reinforcing consequence, is made more probable. Skinner illustrates the concept with an example in which an experimental

Get Access