Was George Justified In Killing Lennie

I believe that George, in no way should be punished for killing Lennie. He did it for the right reasons and it was best for Lennie in that situation. The closure George and Lennie hot from this ordeal was better, and easier this way for both of them. This is a little bit of information on way I believe George was justified in killing Lennie.

George and Lennie were best friends for a long time, more like brothers. Lennie is about as bright as a 2 watt bulb, so George couldn’t really get mad at him when he accidently killed Curley’s wife while feeling the softness of her hair. “…’I ain’t mad. I never been mad, an’ I ain’t now. That’s a thing I want ya to know’”. The two had planned a future together—a future in their own dream ranch, a ranch where no trouble would ever bother them. “’You…an’ me. Ever’body gonna be nice to you. Ain’t gonna be no more trouble. Nobody gonna hurt nobody nor steal from ‘em’”. Then after he tells him about the rabbits that Lennie is so fond of, he shoots him in the back of the head where he knows it will not hurt him, and Lennie will not know what hit him. This is the peaceful alternative to what Curley had in store for him. Curley's exact words were "shoot the bastard right in the guts." George's euthanizing of Lennie makes the mentally incompetent Lennie die with dignity. Had Curley gotten to Lennie first, Lennie would have suffered. This shows you how much George cares for Lennie, no matter what he does or the crimes he commits. He’d always be there to help Lennie get right back up to his feet, make him forget all his worries, and move on like nothing happened. I strongly believe George was the right person to kill Lennie, and made the right decision in doing so, rather than to let him suffer in the hands of Curley.

In the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, George and Lennie learn to travel and experience the world together as they take on a new job working on a ranch in central California "bucking barley" for the ranch owner and his son. Lennie, not being able to control his actions, hurts too many people and things and men were chasing after the two, so George decides to take action and shoot Lennie. Although some may disagree, George did the right thing by shooting Lennie because he could not have avoided hurting someone else in the future, he could not eventually learn that the things he did were wrong due to his disability, and he could not learn to eventually control his own strength.

The Great Depression affected millions of people in America, two of those people affected were George and Lennie. George and Lennie are migrant workers that struck a job in California. George can be described as the brains of the partnership, while Lennie is more of the muscle. In the story Lennie has a fascination with feeling soft objects. This later gets them in trouble in the town of Weed. Once they get to the job, they go months will no big problems. Until, Lennie accidentally killed The owner’s son’s wife. After this happened Lennie ran off, and all the workers went to go find him and kill him. George does find Lennie before any of the other workers, and even with the chance to escape, he shoots Lennie. In John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, the murder of Lennie was not Justified.

Why George should not have killed Lennie in the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck

George was right to kill Lennie. Lennie, a man of tremendous size, has the mind of a young child, while George on the opposite, is an independent individual. Yet such two different people have formed a “family”, clinging together in the face of loneliness and alienation during their journey. Innocent Lennie is mentally challenged with no ability to understand abstract concepts like death. He consistently does not mean to do the things that put him into trouble, and once he does get into trouble, he has no conscience to define his actions in terms of guilt. Consequently, the dramatic scene unfolded - George had no choice but to kill his best friend Lennie after he knew that Lennie killed Curley’s wife. Was George right to kill Lennie? This essay

Lennie then got scared when she started to scream and flail around, so he tried to calm her down by putting his hand over her mouth, which ended up killing her. George was justified in his decision to shoot Lennie, because Lennie was unpredictable and his intentions were

In the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck I think George should not have killed Lennie because they were best friends, disability, and the murder was unintentional. A reason that George should not have killed Lennie is because they were best friends. A quote from the story that proves they are best friends is “tell me like you done before" a few lines later "about the rabbits" (Steinbeck 13). This proves that they are best friends because it implies that Lennie has heard the story multiple times. This means that he has heard it enough that he could remember it.

George honestly, had no choice but to kill Lennie, the way he killed Lennie was the most humane way possible in ensuring he died peacefully, if it weren’t for George the other men would have really hurt Lennie.”I’m gonna get him. I’m going for my shotgun. I’ll shoot ‘im in the guts. Come on guys,”(96) Curley wants to inflict pain on Lennie, with this being said that means LEnnie would have died very upset and feeling threatened, a way George didn't want him to go.

In the novel, George has determined that it was time for Lennie to die and this was a just and good choose. George knew he was the one to kill Lennie because he learned from his past actions. Another reason was he knew that if he killed Lennie he would not suffer. Also, Lennie had no capability to sense reasoning like a normal individual and so he did not comprehend what he had done to Curley's wife.

Day after day you take care of your parents trying to make their pain stop. You try and hope that things will eventually get better. Their cry for help as nothing gets better. What would you do? In the novella Of Mice and Men, there is a similar situation. Should George have killed Lennie? George made this decision based on how he didn’t want anyone to hurt Lennie. But, isn’t that what he is doing? George killing Lennie was wrong this is wrong because Lennie didn’t know what was happening and he wasn’t in any pain. George should have let Lennie make that decision for himself.

Showing Justification Within Interference John Steinbeck employs the idea of the actions of the characters to be justified at the end of the novel Of Mice and Men. The story ends a lot more peacefully than the way the story could have ended with the interference of the other characters from a sad accident. Lennie causes himself and George to be on the run in the beginning of the story, and the two men end up in trouble again at the end of the story once again, because of Lennie’s actions, when Lennie kills Curley’s wife. George kills Lennie while he is dreaming about rabbits, which causes him to be happy when he dies, like George wants him to be. Furthermore, George knows that he wants to kill Lennie himself because Curley and Carlson talk about torturing Lennie to his death and killing him with Carlson’s Luger.

Lennie is dead, but why the killer did it is very ethical. George killed lennie, and I have been given a task was it ethical or unethical, and I say yes it was ethical. I will be talking about why he did it and how, if others in the book would kill him, and proving others why it was a good decision.

In the barn scene Curley’s Wife is looking for company as she is lonely “I get lonely”. Steinbeck tells us of Curley’s Wife’s dreams as she slowly opens up Lennie despite his lack of interest. The reader gains more knowledge about her personality and her need to still fulfil her dreams, “He says I could go with the shows.” Despite her knowing the danger of death, she still lets Lennie stroke her hair as she has the never ending need for attention “Lennie’s fingers closed on her hair and hung

Curley's wife’s inner thoughts are brought out even more when she finally does get a chance to talk to Lennie before she dies. She describes her past and how she got to where she is now: