Why Did The United States Entry Into World War 1

justified for a man to wage war if the war is for the common good or for the good of those who he is fighting for. But if the one whom he is fighting

The United States entered World War I to fight for democracy. Another reason they entered war was because the arguments about capitalism. Part of the reason they entered the war was because of the German submarine warfare. Lives of innocent people were being taken for no reason. “German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind.” “American ships have been sunk, American lives taken, in ways which it has stirred us very deeply to learn of.” John Kenneth Turner said that the he thought that the war was a war for business. World War I made 21,000 new american millionaires, and 60,000 men made more than three billion dollars over their normal income. War makes money which is why Wall Street wanted war. America’s war aims were to keep the people safe, and increase the trading. They wanted to have peace and justice in the

Another reason of why America had to participate in the war was because of America violating the “Sussex Pledge.” America supplied munitions and financial assets to the Allies, because of this Germany didn’t consider America “neutral” anymore. I believe America’s entry into the war was inevitable at this point. I believe

In the Woodrow Wilson: Declaration of Neutrality (1914), Wilson states, “The United State must be neutral in fact, as well as in name, during these days that are to try men’s souls.” In this statement, Wilson stated that he wants to declare neutrality to avoid war and casualties, or to avoid the “days that are to try men’s souls”. Also, he stated that the United States should avoid actions could be perceived as neutral like partisanship, taking sides, and transactions that could be construed to the preference of a certain party of the war. As stated in a letter from William Jennings Bryan to J.P Morgan on August 15, 1914, Bryan stated that United States government would be against American bankers loans to belligerent nations. This was because he did not want to run the risk of looking inconsistent with a policy of neutrality. So, it was apparent America wanted nothing to do with the

### appears to be part of Esssay 384218##World War 1, also known as The Great War, is the fifth-deadliest conflict in history. It was mainly a battle for independence between countries, and until April 6, 1917 the U.S. had tried to pull away from it. Only about 20% of America had actually wanted to get involved, while about 80% had voted against any American involvement. When the American passenger boat known as the Lusitania had been destroyed by German U-boats and the Germans had broken their promise of not destroying any more American ships, there truly was no choice but to fight with the Allies against the Central Powers. The pros and cons of entering this war are very debatable, yet quite factual when basing them on life in this time period. Three pro arguments that were relevant would be that the Germans needed to be stopped, that the war would actually lead to peace, and that it had certainly improved our nation. Three con arguments could be that the Great Depression was pushed with the U.S. being involved, that the Allies really didn’t need America’s assistance, and that people believed that this war would not lead to peace at all.

7. Q. Why were the War Hawks so intent on pushing the new Republic into a war with Great Britain?

This was a controversial plan that fed a need to relieve the war debts in the United States. This was also integral in forming a difference between the United States and Great Britain, since unlike the Bank of England it’s focus was on funding internal improvements for the government

Had the United States entered the war any earlier the consequences may have been worse. Over the years, it has been widely debated whether the United States should have entered the war sooner and thus saved many lives. While it is true that the United States could have entered the war earlier this would have caused many more complications for the citizens of the United States. “ I believe that I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make it very certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us.(For a Declaration of War)” From this statement it is obvious that President Roosevelt had the welfare of his people at the forefront of his mind. In spite of Roosevelt’s and the citizens of the Unted States reluctance to enter the war we now know that the U.S. involvement in WWII was

To the frustration of much of the President’s entourage, he still persisted that it would be a ‘crime’ for America to allow itself to be sucked into the war since it would ‘make it impossible to save Europe afterwards’. President Wilson wanted the world to be pacified, but with a piece without victory (Adam Tooze 65). Added to the now-routine, the sinking of ships by German U-boats, and with the refusal from Berlin to even deny this unprovoked aggression, it left Wilson with no other options. On April 2nd 1917, he went before the senate to demand a declaration of war (Adam Tooze 66-67).

In order to show not only the citizens but also the other countries of the world the kind of World Power America is, joining the war and defeating Germany was the only option. One of Germany's’ biggest mistakes was sending that telegram involving America in the war. Not only was national security threatened but Americans were outraged and citizens fully supported the government's choice in joining the

On April sixth,1917, two days after the United States senate voted to declare war on Germany, the U.S. House of Representatives made the decision by a vote of 373 to 50, and the United States formally enters the first war. Once World War I had started in 1914, The united states President , Woodrow Wilson pledged neutral for the United States, a position favored by mostly of Americans. In 1917, late March, Germany sunk four more U.S. merchant ships. On April 2, President Woodrow Wilson went before congress and wanted to declare war against Germany, four days later, his wish was granted. Soon after President Woodrow Wilson declared war , the first 14,000 troops started to begin training for combat in France, on June 26(“U.S. enters World War I”). Despite measures taken to improve the United States military, Wilson was not able to offer the Allies much immediate help to form a big military. The army was only able to get about 100,000 men at the time of American entrance into the war, and a sum of 50,000 of those troops had never returned, which means they most likely lost their lives.Stil, most important effect of the U.S. entrance was very bad in economic. By the beginning of the war, Britain alone was spending at least $75 million dollars per week on U.S. arms and supplies, both for itself and for it allies, and had an huge overdraft of $358 million dollars, but the United States entry into the war saved Britain, and the rest of the Entente from bankrupt. Though the U.S. Army’s contributions began slowly, but they would eventually mark a major turning point in the war effort and helped the Allies to a

The first person interviewed said that they agreed more with the first point, about how war is fought by the people who didn’t have anything to do with it, rather than the

On August 4th, 1914 President Wilson officially announced that America would be neutral in World War One. This neutral stance extended to a policy of “fairness” by which American bankers could lend money to both sides of the war. Overseas trade was more complicated. Trade

War is generally characterized by extreme aggression, destruction and mortality. Although killing in war isn't strange, the killings of innocent civilians, however is unjustified by the War Crimes Act. A war crime is defined as "any grave breach of the Geneva Convention". War crimes are unjustified by military necessity, and killing civilians is one of them. The legitimate question is who should be held responsible, morally or legally for the acts they commit throughout war time. Officials should be held responsible for crimes committed during wartime, yet the ones delivering those orders should not suffer the consequences.

I feel that everyone has an idea of what the opportunity cost of war is. One would most certainly think that one opportunity cost is the lives that those who lost their lives in a war could have lived as well as the amount of money spent on such war that could have been spent on something more beneficiary for our society. Dr. Weigl’s interview did, however, allow me to think of such opportunity costs more deeply.