preview

business law

Better Essays

NAME: FIN NO.: BATCH NO.: MODULE: BUSINESS LAW LECTURER: MR MAHADEVAN LUKSHUMAYEH Question: In early 2013, Beauty property developer negotiated with Stylish over a new house in the eastern sector of Singapore. Beauty and Stylish had various meetings about the cost and finish of the house. At one of their meetings, Stylish asked Beauty whether the price of the house included curtains, blinds and window coverings. Beauty explained that all window coverings were provided for in the contract. Several weeks later Stylish agreed to purchase the proposed house and signed a written contract. The contract however contained the following clause: Clause 3 – The contract price of the house excludes all window coverings. The provision …show more content…

Factors misrepresentation helps us point out the existence of a misrepresentation and is applicable in this case: First, a misrepresentation is a statement of fact; it is not a statement of law, intention, or inflated opinion of an adviser. Second, the statement must be false. Third, a party to the contract other reports, that on one side the other confusing. Finally, the representative shall be caused to the other party to the contract. It may be a case of Fraudulent Misrepresentation; Beauty knew and deliberately makes a false statement. So in this case, Beauty must take full responsibility for the false claim that. Then Stylish may cancel the contract to reclaim their rights and sue Beauty for the costs under the tort of deceit. Stylish can claim expenses due him as a result of the Misrepresentation of Beauty and go ahead with the contract. The cost is a form of financial compensation and measures to overcome the most common laws available to the plaintiff's rights. Stylish may request additional curtains, blinds and window coverings in the home as a form of compensation for the fraudulent acts of Beauty, the Stylish standing to receive from Beauty as well. If Beauty while making false claims without a reasonable basis for the statement is true, then it will be a case of Negligence Misunderstanding. Accordingly, Beauty not sure about the

Get Access