2) figure: Consider a growing random network starting with 4 fully connected nodes as seen in the 3 So, m = 3 and each new born node will be numbered starting from 4 and will connect to the 3 existing nodes. Write down the formula for the expected degree of the node 6 at time t (so i = 6).

2) figure: Consider a growing random network starting with 4 fully connected nodes as seen in the 3 So, m = 3 and each new born node will be numbered starting from 4 and will connect to the 3 existing nodes. Write down the formula for the expected degree of the node 6 at time t (so i = 6).

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Write the algorithm that finds and returns how many paths in k units of length between any given two nodes (source node, destination node; source and target nodes can also be the same) in a non-directional and unweighted line of N nodes represented as a neighborhood matrix. (Assume that each side in the unweighted diagram is one unit long.) Note: By using the problem reduction method of the Transform and Conquer strategy, you have to make the given problem into another problem. Algorithm howManyPath (M [0..N-1] [0..N-1], source, target, k)// Input: NxN neighborhood matrix, source, target nodes, k value.// Ouput: In the given line, there are how many different paths of k units length between the given source and target node.
Using a teleportation probability of 0.25, setup the matrix calculations for computing the PageRank of the nodes in the web graph. Calculate the PageRank for each node after one iteration. Please show the work to achieve maximum points. B D A C E
In a lecture the professor said that for every minimum spanning tree T of G there is an execution of the algorithm of Kruskal which delivers T as a result. ( Input is G). The algorithm he was supposedly talking about is: Kruskal() Precondition. N = (G, cost) is a connected network with n = |V| node and m = |E| ≥ n − 1 edges.All edges of E are uncolored. postcondition: All edges are colored. The green-colored edges together with V form one MST by N. Grand Step 1: Sort the edges of E in increasing weight: e1 , e2, . . . , em Grand step 2: For t = 0.1, . . . , m − 1 execute: Apply Kruskal's coloring rule to the et+1 edge i dont really understand this statement or how it is done. can someone explain me what he meant?
Homework due Sep 15, 2022 03:59 +04 Exercise 1 In Exercise 1, we will calculate the chance homophily for an arbitrary characteristic. Homophily is the proportion of edges in the network whose constituent nodes share that characteristic. How much homophily do we expect by chance? If characteristics are distributed completely randomly, the probability that two nodes and y share characteristic a is the probability both nodes have characteristica. which is the marginal probability of a squared. The total probability that nodes x and y share their characteristic is therefore the sum of the square of the marginal probabilities of each characteristic in the network. Instructions • Create a function marginal_prob that takes a dictionary chars with personal IDs as keys and characteristics as values; it should return a dictionary with characteristics as keys and their marginal probability (frequency of occurence of a characteristic divided by the sum of frequencies of each characteristic) as…
Please answer the following question in detail and explain all the proofs and assumptions for all parts. The question has three parts, (a), (b) and (c). Iterative lengthening search is an iterative analogue of uniform-cost search. The basic idea is to use increasing limits on path cost. If a node is generated whose path cost exceeds the current limit, it is immediately discarded. For each new iteration, the limit is set to the lowest path cost of any node discarded in the previous iteration. (a) Show that this algorithm is optimal for general path costs. You may assume that all costs are integers (this is not a loss of generality if the search space is finite). You may wish to consider the minimal path cost C; what happens when we set the path cost to be some limit l < C? (b) Consider a uniform tree with branching factor b, solution depth d, and unit step costs (each action costs one unit). How many iterations will iterative lengthening require? (c) (7 points) Now consider the…
In the Erdös-Rényi random network model, suppose N=101 and p=1/20, that is, there are 101 vertices, and every pair of vertices has a probability of 1/20 of being connected by an edge. For the network model given what is the probability that a network generated with those parameters has exactly 400 edges? No need to give the decimal value, the mathematical expression will suffice
Given N cities represented as vertices V₁, V2, 9 un on an undirected graph (i.e., each edge can be traversed in both directions). The graph is fully-connected where the edge ei, connecting any two vertices vį and vj is the straight-line distance between these two cities. We want to search for the shortest path from v₁ (the source) to vn (the destination). Assume that all edges have different values, and e₁, has the largest value among the edges. That is, the source and destination have the largest straight-line distance. Compare the lists of explored vertices when we run the uniform-cost search and the A* search for this problem. Hint: The straight-line distance is the shortest path between any two cities. If you do not know how to start, try to run the algorithms by hand on some small cases first; but remember to make sure your graphs satisfy the conditions in the question.
Apply the shortest-augmenting path algorithm to find a maximum flow in the following networks (labeled graphs in which the edge labels represent flow capacity, and there is a single source and a single sink). Write versions of the labeled graphs as executed by the algorithm. Use lexicographical order whenever applicable. Next augmenting path Result after augmentation 2 2 2 2 6. 4 4 4 4 4 7 4 6. 7 8
A weighted graph consists of 5 nodes and the connections are described by: i. ii. iii. iv. Node 1 is connected with nodes 2 and 3 using weights 2 and 6 respectively.Node 2 is connected with nodes 3, 4 and 5 using weights 7, 3 and 4 respectively.Node 3 is connected with nodes 4 and 5 using weights -2 and 2 respectively.Node 4 is connected with node 5 using weight -1. Solve the problem for finding the minimum path to reach each nodes from the first node
Given a graph of friends who have different interests, determine which groups of friends have the most interests in common. Then use a little math to determine a value to return. The graph will be represented as a series of nodes numbered consecutively from 1 to friends_nodes. Friendships have evolved based on interests which will be represented as weights in the graph. Any members who share the same interest are said to be connected by that interest. Once the node pairs with the maximum number of shared interests are determined, multiply the friends_nodes of the resulting node pairs and return the maximal product.
The following graph is given. Let all arcs (links or edges) have the same cost, S is the start node, G is the Goal node, and h is the heuristic function. Determine using Best-First Search the order of nodes to be visited. Match the left side (node number) to the right side (order of visit). Select zero for the node that is never visited. S h(S)=7 h(A)=6 ( A h(B)=5 h(G)=0 G C h(C)=4 D h(D)=2
Let A, B, C, D be the vertices of a square with side length 100. If we want to create a minimum-weight spanning tree to connect these four vertices, clearly this spanning tree would have total weight 300 (e.g. we can connect AB, BC, and CD). But what if we are able to add extra vertices inside the square, and use these additional vertices in constructing our spanning tree? Would the minimum-weight spanning tree have total weight less than 300? And if so, where should these additional vertices be placed to minimize the total weight? Let G be a graph with the vertices A, B, C, D, and possibly one or more additional vertices that can be placed anywhere you want on the (two-dimensional) plane containing the four vertices of the square. Determine the smallest total weight for the minimum-weight spanning tree of G. Round your answer to the nearest integer. Attention: Please don't just copy these two following answers, which are not correct at all. Thank you.…