2. Suppose the Harrisonburg city council is concerned about the increase in crime in the city. Crimes in H'burg are inefficient in the sense that it costs society $20,000 more than the benefits to the criminal. If an offender is caught, tried and convicted they are sent to jail. Assume that the total social cost of trial, conviction, and punishment is $150,000 per criminal caught. The council is considering hiring additional police officers dedicated to detecting crime. This change would increase the fraction of offenders who are caught from 20% to 30%. The city estimates that this will decrease the number of crimes from 2,000 a year to either 1,200 or 1,600 per year. For each case: 1,200 or 1,600: For each question, make sure you justify your work and provide a clear explanation. a. What happens to the social cost of crimes committed? b. What happens to the cost of trying, convicting, and punishing offenders? c. What is the most that the city should be willing to pay for the new police officers?

2. Suppose the Harrisonburg city council is concerned about the increase in crime in the city. Crimes in H'burg are inefficient in the sense that it costs society $20,000 more than the benefits to the criminal. If an offender is caught, tried and convicted they are sent to jail. Assume that the total social cost of trial, conviction, and punishment is $150,000 per criminal caught. The council is considering hiring additional police officers dedicated to detecting crime. This change would increase the fraction of offenders who are caught from 20% to 30%. The city estimates that this will decrease the number of crimes from 2,000 a year to either 1,200 or 1,600 per year. For each case: 1,200 or 1,600: For each question, make sure you justify your work and provide a clear explanation. a. What happens to the social cost of crimes committed? b. What happens to the cost of trying, convicting, and punishing offenders? c. What is the most that the city should be willing to pay for the new police officers?

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3PA: Greater consumption of alcohol leads to more motor vehicle accidents and, thus, imposes costs on...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2. How would you explain to a skeptical bank manager why the socially optimal number of bank robberies is not zero?
Consider two ways to protect your car from theft.The Club (a steering wheel lock) makes it difficult fora car thief to take your car. Lojack (a tracking system)makes it easier for the police to catch the car thiefwho has stolen it. Which of these methods confersa negative externality on other car owners? Whichconfers a positive externality? Do you think there areany policy implications of your analysis?
1. For purposes of this question, note that pecuniary externalities are not typically considered to be a standard externality. The global supply of a popular chili sauce is largely or exclusively manufactured by one factory in California. a. Suppose that when this factory opened, it purchased a large tract of land and then began buying inputs like machines and peppers from nearby firms. Further suppose these purchases caused nearby land and housing values to increase, squeezing nearby renters. Is that increase an externality the way it is usually defined? In 1-2 sentences, why or why not? b. Production of this chili sauce uses large quantities of peppers, and suppose the factory installs a new ventilation system that emits particles from pepper processing to the neighborhood, causing neighbors’ eyes and throats to suffer, and then nearby home values fall. Is that decrease in home values an externality the way it is usually defined? In one sentence, why or why not?
WHY SHOULD OTHER PECPLE BENEFIT FROM MY HARD WORK? 1994 Wateron De tyh e d Figure 1 Figure 1 shows how Calvin carefully avoids creating a positive externality (think of this as the equivalent of a factory applying a filter to eliminate any polluting emissions). Assume that this way of snow shovelling does not create any additional costs for Calvin (no extra effort and he has no plans to return home any time soon). b) As creating positive externalities leads to a social problem (see question a), and Calvin's way of snow shovelling avoids creating positive externalities, does Calvin's behaviour imply an efficiency improvement from a social point of view? Explain.
2. Efficiency in the presence of externalities Vaping imposes many external costs on society secondhand smoke, the adverse health burdens imposed on society, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quiantity of vapes does not equal the socially optimal quantity. The following graph plots the demand for vapes (their private value), the supply of vapes (the private cost of producing them), and the social cost of vapes, including both the private cost and external costs. Use the block point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quaneity Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially opamal quantity ? PRICE OF VAPES Demand (Private Value) QUANTITY OF VAPES Social Cost Supply (Private Cost) + Market Equilibrium Socially Optimal Level
ASAP plz Why don't people/stores make different decisions? Cost is a factor: a case of foam take-out containers costs $25, compared with $58 for paper and recyclable-plastics. How does this affect the firm's profit? Are consumers willing to pay more? Negative externality Consider the demand and supply given above. Suppose there is an external cost given by MEC=5Q. Find social equilibrium price and quantity. Draw a graph and label both private and social equilibrium.
Suppose that there is an environmental policy that could reduce the average concentration of a toxic substance to which 3 million people are exposed. Suppose that as a result of the reduction in exposure the risk of death reduces from 1 out of 50,000 to 1 out of 60,000. a. What is the expected number of lives that could potentially be saved from this environmental policy? a. If each of the 3 million people who are exposed is willing to pay $8 for this reduction in risk, then what is the implied value of a statistical life that is potentially saved as a result of this environmental policy? a. Your boss asks you to estimate what must be the maximum cost of such an environmental policy. Provide a justification for the upper limit on the cost of such an environmental policy.
2. Suppose your neighbor likes to host parties at their house. They value having these parties at $200. These parties, however, impose a cost on you due to the noise they make. a. If your disutility is $100 from the noise being made, and you have the right to it being quiet, is there a solution that you and your neighbor can agree on? If so, what is it? b. If your disutility is $250 from the noise being made, and you have the right to no noise being made, is there a solution that both of you could agree on? If so, what is it? If not, what can change in terms of property rights to make an agreement possible?
1. Governments and pharmaceutical companies rushed quickly ahead to develop a vaccine. Vaccinations and immunizations are examples of positive externalities. A positive externality is when an activity creates a benefit for those who are not involved in the transaction, a third party. Let’s examine the vaccination of Covid-19 as a positive externality. Question: Why is the Covid-19 vaccination considered a positive externality? 2. Considering the information provided and your responses to Question 3 explain the potential unintended consequences of each one of these polices. Which policy would you enact and why?
1. Please explain what is meant by externality, then give an example of an externality casepositive and negative2. Explain the way or form of government intervention to solve the problem negative externality
In order to offset increasing health care costs arising from pollution, a country decides to tax the offending companies. What is this government trying to accomplish? O a. to initiate a cap and trade system O b.to privatize a public good c. to internalize externalities O d. to create a common resource 4
1. Choose one of the approaches listed below for protecting elephants from poachers in African countries. A. The government sets up enormous national parks that have sufficient habitat for elephants to thrive and forbids all local people to enter the parks or to injure either the elephants or their habitat in any way. B. The government sets up national parks and designates ten villages around the park's edges as official tourist centers that become places where tourists can stay and bases for guided tours inside the national park. 2. Depending on the approach you have chosen (A or B), explain how the incentives will affect the local villagers, who are often very poor. 3. Which approach (A or B) seems more likely to help the elephant population?4. Discuss the practice of poaching elephants and the need for environmental protection? 5. Explain how the practice of poaching elephants is a negative externality?