Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
According to Calhoun, in what cases could states nullify federal laws? 2. Why was the Tariff of 1828 unpopular?

According to Calhoun, in what cases could states nullify federal laws? 2. Why was the Tariff of 1828 unpopular?

icon
Related questions
Question
1. According to Calhoun, in what cases could states nullify federal laws? 2. Why was the Tariff of 1828 unpopular?
Andrew Jackson's Presidency: Nullification Crisis Context: The crisis over the Tariff of 1828 continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the Age of Jackson: namely, that many southerners believed a Jacksonian democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. Jackson believed in enforcing a strong central government, and southerners claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty. The Tariff of 1828 (nicknamed Tariff of Abominations) had driven Vice President Calhoun argued that if a national majority acted against the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void or nullify-federal law. By the early 1830s, the battle over the tariff took on new urgency as the price of cotton continued to fall. In 1818, cotton had been thirty-one cents per pound. By 1831, it had sunk to eight cents per pound. While production of cotton had soared during this time and this increase contributed to the decline in prices, many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank. NULLIFICATION CRISIS TITLE BOUT-JACKSON VS CALHOUN FEDERAL
Transcribed Image Text:Andrew Jackson's Presidency: Nullification Crisis Context: The crisis over the Tariff of 1828 continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the Age of Jackson: namely, that many southerners believed a Jacksonian democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. Jackson believed in enforcing a strong central government, and southerners claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty. The Tariff of 1828 (nicknamed Tariff of Abominations) had driven Vice President Calhoun argued that if a national majority acted against the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void or nullify-federal law. By the early 1830s, the battle over the tariff took on new urgency as the price of cotton continued to fall. In 1818, cotton had been thirty-one cents per pound. By 1831, it had sunk to eight cents per pound. While production of cotton had soared during this time and this increase contributed to the decline in prices, many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank. NULLIFICATION CRISIS TITLE BOUT-JACKSON VS CALHOUN FEDERAL
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer