Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, Sotheby’s sold the Edgar Degas bronze sculpture Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans at auction for a price of $9.63 million. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12.84 million. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture?

Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, Sotheby’s sold the Edgar Degas bronze sculpture Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans at auction for a price of $9.63 million. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12.84 million. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture?

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter7: Losses—deductions And Limitations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 45P: The Goodson Company is a chain of retail electronics stores. How much of a loss can Goodson deduct...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, Sotheby’s sold the Edgar Degas bronze sculpture Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans at auction for a price of $10,311,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12,377,500. What was his annual rate of return (percentage) on this sculpture?
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, Sotheby’s sold the Edgar Degas bronze sculpture Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans at auction for a price of $9.86 million. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12.56 million. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed profitability. During 2003, Sotheby’s sold the Edgar Degas bronze sculpture Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans at auction for a price of $10,311,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12,377,500. What was his annual rate of return on the sculpture?
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, Sotheby's sold the Edgar Degas bronze sculpture Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans at auction for a price of $10,311,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12,377,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Annual rate of return
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. Assume that in 2015, an auction house sold a statute at auction for a price of $10,647,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2011 at a price of $12,681,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture?
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. Assume that in 2015, an auction house sold a statute at auction for a price of $10,563,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2011 at a price of $12,605,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Rate of return %
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2003, a sculpture was sold at auctions for a price of $10,316,500. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 1999 at a price of $12,373,500. What was his annual rate of return on this sculpture?
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. During 2015, an auction house sold a painting for a price of $1,010,000. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it three years earlier at a price of $1,590,000. What was his annual rate of return on this painting? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Annual rate of return %
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. In 2010, an auction house sold a painting at auction for a price of $1,200,000. Unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it three years earlier at a price of $1,780,000. What was his annual rate of return on this painting? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Annual rate of return ( Prev 8 of 9 Next >
Al Aznar Company is manufacturer of furniture. At the end of 2018, they have inventory worth $ 14500 and out of that $ 4500 worth inventory is damaged. The company decided to repair the inventory and sell it for 3500. The repair cost is $ 500.1. When do a company write down its inventory value (cost) to the Net Realizable Value?2. Imagine that the company decided to sell the damaged inventory for $ 3200 without spending any amount for repairing, how much amount need to write off from the value of inventory at the end of the period?
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the “residual value,” computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value).
Subasta Corporation was able to acquire second hand goods worth P100,000 in an auction. The goods can be sold as is for P120,000 or reconditioned at a cost of P30,000 and sold for P170,000. 1. Identify the irrelevant cost in this problem. Why? 2. Which alternative should be chosen: sell as is or recondition. Why? 3. What is the opportunity cost of reconditioning the goods. Why?