Assuming that the Hubble constant is, in fact, constant over the age of the universe, what is the Hubble look-back time (effectively the age of the universe in this case) if the Hubble constant is measured to be 50 km/s/Mpc (Please give your answer in units of billions of years; i.e. 10 billion years should be answered as 10)? Keep in mind that this is not the observed measurement of the Hubble constant (70 km/s/Mpc) and is only a value given for this problem. That said, it is not incredibly different so you should expect your answer to still be on the scale of billions of years.

Assuming that the Hubble constant is, in fact, constant over the age of the universe, what is the Hubble look-back time (effectively the age of the universe in this case) if the Hubble constant is measured to be 50 km/s/Mpc (Please give your answer in units of billions of years; i.e. 10 billion years should be answered as 10)? Keep in mind that this is not the observed measurement of the Hubble constant (70 km/s/Mpc) and is only a value given for this problem. That said, it is not incredibly different so you should expect your answer to still be on the scale of billions of years.

Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337399920

Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman

Publisher:Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman

Chapter17: Modern Cosmology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Using our example from the previous unit, let's try to determine the Hubble time for this example universe. You were given that a good representative galaxy receded at a speed of 4000 km/s and was found to be 20 Mpc away. With that in mind, what would the age of that universe be in years (aka what is that universe's Hubble time)? Go ahead and take the number of kilometers per Mpc to be approximately 3.1*10^19 km/Mpc. While this problem may look scary at first, this is really just bringing you full circle to one of the unit conversion problems you encountered at the beginning of this course.
mathematician Archimedes, responding to a claim that the number of grains of sand was infinite, calculated that the number of grains of sand needed to fill the universe was on the order of 1063. Our understanding of the size of the universe has changed since then, and we now know that the observable universe alone is a sphere with a radius of 1026 m. Estimating the size of a grain of sand, A) Approximately how many grains of sand would fill the observable universe? B) How many times larger or smaller is this number than Archimedes' result?
(a) Calculate the approximate age of the universe from the average value of the Hubble constant, H0 = 20km/s ⋅ Mly . To do this, calculate the time it would take to travel 1 Mly at a constant expansion rate of 20 km/s. (b) If deceleration is taken into account, would the actual age of the universe be greater or less than that found here? Explain.
If a galaxy is 9.0 Mpc away from Earth and recedes at 488 km/s, what is H, (in km/s/Mpc)? | km/s/Mpc What is the Hubble time (in yr)? | years How old (in yr) would the universe be, assuming space-time is flat and the expansion of the universe has not been accelerating? years How would acceleration change your answer? O If the expansion of the Universe has been accelerating, the Universe could be substantially younger than the value entered above. O If the expansion of the Universe has been accelerating, the Universe could be substantially older than the value entered above. Need Help? Read It
Suppose that the universe were full of spherical objects, each of mass m and radius r . If the objects were distributed uniformly throughout the universe, what number density (#/m3) of spherical objects would be required to make the density equal to the critical density of our Universe? Values: m = 4 kg r = 0.0407 m Answer must be in scientific notation and include zero decimal places (1 sig fig --- e.g., 1234 should be written as 1*10^3)
(a) Calculate the approximate age of the universe from the average value of the Hubble constant, H0 = 20km/s ⋅ Mly . To do this, calculate the time itwould take to travel 1 Mly at a constant expansion rate of 20 km/s.(b) If deceleration is taken into account, would the actual age of the universe be greater or less than that found here? Explain.
If a galaxy is 8.9 Mpc away from Earth and recedes at 497 km/s, what is H. (in km/s/Mpc)? km/s/Mрс What is the Hubble time (in yr)? years How old (in yr) would the universe be, assuming space-time is flat and the expansion of the universe has not been accelerating? years How would acceleration change your answer? If the expansion of the Universe has been accelerating, the Universe could be substantially younger than the value entered above. If the expansion of the Universe has been accelerating, the Universe could be substantially older than the value entered above.
I asked the following question and was given the attached solution: Suppose that the universe were full of spherical objects, each of mass m and radius r . If the objects were distributed uniformly throughout the universe, what number density (#/m3) of spherical objects would be required to make the density equal to the critical density of our Universe? Values: m = 4 kg r = 0.0407 m Answer must be in scientific notation and include zero decimal places (1 sig fig --- e.g., 1234 should be written as 1*10^3) I don't follow the work and I got the wrong answer, so please help and show your work as I do not follow along easily thanks
Assume the observable Universe is charge neutral, and that it contains n nuclei (hydrogen plus helium nuclei, ignoring other elements). Take the helium mass fraction as 1/4. How many electrons are there in the observable Universe? Enter your answer in scientific notation with one decimal place. Values: n = 1*10^80
According to the tiny world experiment, there are only 5.2 intermediates between any two people on Earth (thus 6-degree of separation). This is a remark that has been made for well over half a century. The Internet may be useful in this regard. Let's pretend that everyone on Earth doubles their friend count on Facebook, Twitter, and every other social network they participate in (2x). Calculate the relative distance between us now. What do you think it is?
(e) An optical spectrum of a galaxy has a magnesium absorption line at a wavelength of 531.3 nm. Given that the rest wavelength of the calcium line is 517.5 nm, what is the redshift of this galaxy? -1 -1 Assuming a value for Hubble's Constant (Ho) of 67.6 km s-¹ Mpc-¹, estimate the distance to the galaxy in Megaparsecs. Note any assumptions you have made.
Assume the observable Universe is charge neutral, and that it contains n nuclei (hydrogen plus helium nuclei, ignoring other elements). Take the helium mass fraction as 1/4. How many electrons are there in the observable Universe? Enter your answer in scientific notation with one decimal place.