Ayen, Tristan and joey are solidary debtors under a loan obligation of P900,000.00 which has fallen due. However, Adolf, the creditor, condoned Ayen’s entire share in the debt. Since Tristan has become insolvent, Adolf makes a demand on Joey to pay the debt. 4.a) How much, if any, may Joey be compelled to pay? 4.b) To what extent, if at all, can Ayen be compelled by Joey to contribute to such payment?

Ayen, Tristan and joey are solidary debtors under a loan obligation of P900,000.00 which has fallen due. However, Adolf, the creditor, condoned Ayen’s entire share in the debt. Since Tristan has become insolvent, Adolf makes a demand on Joey to pay the debt. 4.a) How much, if any, may Joey be compelled to pay? 4.b) To what extent, if at all, can Ayen be compelled by Joey to contribute to such payment?

Individual Income Taxes

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357109731

Author:Hoffman

Publisher:Hoffman

Chapter6: Deductions And Losses: In General

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 22DQ: Ray loses his job as a result of a corporate downsizing. Consequently, he falls behind on the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. Define compensation as a mode of extinguishing an obligation, and distinguish it from payment. 2. Ayen, Tristan and joey are solidary debtors under a loan obligation of P900,000.00 which has fallen due. However, Adolf, the creditor, condoned Ayen’s entire share in the debt. Since Tristan has become insolvent, Adolf makes a demand on Joey to pay the debt. 4.a) How much, if any, may Joey be compelled to pay? 4.b) To what extent, if at all, can Ayen be compelled by Joey to contribute to such payment?
3. Jose obtained a loan from Pedro amounting to PhP1 Million. As a security, Jose mortgaged his land (with a fair market value of PhP700,000.00) to Pedro. Subsequently, Jose sold the land to Mario. What is the effect of the sale of the land to the obligation of Jose to Pedro? Assuming Jose could not pay his obligation, what are the remedies of Pedro? Explain your answer.
Ray loses his job as a result of a corporate downsizing. Consequently, he falls behind on the mortgage payments on his personal residence. His friend Ted would like to make the delinquent mortgage payments for him. a. Could the payments be structured so that Ray can deduct the mortgage interest? b. Could the payment arrangement deny both Ray and Ted a mortgage interest deduction? c. Could the payments be structured so that Ted can deduct the mortgage interest?
Quince owns a used-car lot where Ray works as a salesperson. Quince tells Ray not to make any warranties for the cars. To make a sale to Sylvia, however, Ray adds a 50,000-mile warranty. Later, Sylvia sues Quince for breach of warranty. Quince may hold Ray liable for any damages he must pay to Sylvia under which remedy: a. indemnification b. avoidance c. constructive trust d. accounting
Einstein is indebted to Galileo P30, 000,000.00 secured by a mortgage on his motorcycle. Galileo abandoned his right over the said mortgage, can he still demand payment of the obligation?
4. Samantha borrowed P100,000 from Paola. On due date of the loan, Samantha could not pay Paola because she lost to a robber the P100,000 intended for the payment of her debt. In addition, she suffered financial problems, and she was short of cash even for her current family needs. Can Samantha legally justify her inability to pay Paola? Explain.
a.) How much did Dora borrowed today? b.) Dora failed to settle all monthly dues scheduled but Barney’s collection agency who represents Kenand Barbie waives penalties due to payment default and allowed her to settle all amount dues plusinterest on May 14, 2024. How much is the total amount due that she should settle with Barney? c.) Dora wishes to pay Ken and Barbie in one lump sum amount on August 14, 2023. How much in totalis she allowed pay on that day to discharge the entire loan?
S (debtor) is indebted to T (creditor) in the amount of PhP50,000.00. S proposed to T that Y will be the one to pay the debt, making him (Y) as the new debtor. T agreed to the proposal. It turned out, however, that Y is insolvent so T was not able to collect the amount due from Y. Question: Can T enforce the obligation to S, given the insolvency of Y? Explain your answer.
1.Three years ago, Morris loaned Alma $5,000 (Year 1) with the understanding that the loan would be repaid in two years. Last year (Year 3) Alma filed for bankruptcy, and Morris learned that he would receive $0.10 on the dollar. In the current year, Year 4, the final settlement was made, and Morris received $300. Assuming the loan is a nonbusiness bad debt, how should Morris account for the loan? a. $4,700 ordinary loss in the current year. b. $3,000 ordinary loss last year and $1,700 ordinary loss in the current year c. $4,700 short-term capital loss in the current year. d. $3,000 short-term capital loss last year and $1,700 short-term capital loss in the current year.
Peter Diamond owed Carter $500,000 secured by a first mortgage on Diamond’s plant and land. Stephens was a surety on this obligation in the amount of $250,000. After Diamond defaulted on the debt, Carter demanded and received payment of $250,000 from Stephens. Carter then foreclosed upon the mortgage and sold the property for $375,000. What rights, if any, does Stephens have in the proceeds from the sale of the property?
1. Adrian is a bank manager. A customer Neo has come into the bank. Neo has a mortgage loan with the bank. Neo claims he has lost his job and will not be able to pay the loan back. His monthly payment is $1,000. Neo offers Adrian $7,500 as an accord and satis-faction. Can Neo enter into an accord and satisfaction with the bank? If not, how can he extinguish his liability to the bank? 2. Adrian is a bank manager. A customer Neo has come into the bank. Neo has a mortgage loan with the bank. Neo claims he has lost his job and will not be able to pay the loan back. His monthly payment is $1,000. Neo offers Adrian $7,500 as an accord and satis-faction. Can Neo enter into an accord and satisfaction with the bank? If not, how can he extinguish his liability to the bank?
Mrs. S borrowed P20,000.00 from PG. She and her 19-year-old son, Mario, signed the promissory note for the loan, which note did not say anything about the capacity of the signers. Mrs. S made partial payments little by little. After several years, she died leaving a balance of P10,000.00 on the note. PG demanded payment from Mario who refused to pay. When sued for the amount, Mario raised the defense that when he signed the note he was still a minor. Should the defense be sustained? Why?