Consider a two-person exchange economy in which person 1 owns 200 units of x and 100 units of y while person 2 owns 100 units of x and 200 units y. Suppose their preferences over the two goods can be represented as: U1 (x, y) = y + 50Inx U2 (x, y) = y + 150lnx 1. How much of x do they trade among each other? 2. Does the First Welfare Theorem (FWT) hold in this economy? 3. Can some individuals be made better off if we are at the Pareto efficient allocation?

Consider a two-person exchange economy in which person 1 owns 200 units of x and 100 units of y while person 2 owns 100 units of x and 200 units y. Suppose their preferences over the two goods can be represented as: U1 (x, y) = y + 50Inx U2 (x, y) = y + 150lnx 1. How much of x do they trade among each other? 2. Does the First Welfare Theorem (FWT) hold in this economy? 3. Can some individuals be made better off if we are at the Pareto efficient allocation?

Macroeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617390

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter1: What Economics Is About

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Carol and Bob both consume the same goods in an economy of pure exchange. Carol is initially endowed with 9 units of good 1 and 6 units of good 2. Bob is initially endowed with 18 units of good 1 and 3 units of good 2. They both have the utility function U(x₁, x₂) = 1/3 2/3 x1³x2³. If we set good 1 as the numeraire (so that p. = $1), what will the equilibrium price of good 2 be?
Consider a two-person exchange economy in which person 1 owns 200 units of x and 100 units of y while person 2 owns 100 units of x and 200 units y. Suppose their preferences over the two goods can be represented as: U1 (x, y) = y + 50Inx U2 (x, y) = y + 150lnx 1. How much of x do they trade among each other? 2. Does the First Welfare Theorem (FWT) hold in this economy?
Carol and Bob both consume the same goods in an economy of pure exchange. Carol is initially endowed with 9 units of good 1 and 6 units of good 2. Bob is initially endowed with 18 units of good 1 and 3 units of good 2. They both have the utility function U(x₁, x₂) = = $1), what will the equilibrium price of x1/³x/3. If we set good 1 as the numeraire (so that p₁ good 2 be?
1.2 Ann and Bob each own 10 bottles of beer and, altogether, they own 20 bags of peanuts. There are no other people and no other goods in the economy, and no production of either good is possible. Using a to denote bottles of beer and y to denote bags of peanuts, Ann's and Bob's preferences are described by the following utility functions: UA (XA, YA) = TAYA and UB (XB, YB) = 2xB+ YB. In each of the following cases, determine the market equilibrium price ratio and allocation and depict the equilibrium in an Edgeworth box diagram. (a) Bob owns 20 bags of peanuts and Ann owns no peanuts. (b) Bob owns 15 bags of peanuts and Ann owns 5 bags. (c) Ann owns 20 bags of peanuts and Bob owns no peanuts.
Neha and Sonam consume only Coke and Pepsi in a two person and two goods exchange economy. Neha consumes these two goods in fixed proportions such that she consumes 2 bottles of coke with 1 bottle of Pepsi. Sonam's utility function is given by U = 4P + 3C . In the economy, there is a total of 100 bottles of Pepsi and 200 bottles of Coke. If Neha initially had 60 bottles of Pepsi and 80 bottles of coke, then in the equilibrium position, Sonam will consume: A. between 50 to 60 bottles of Pepsi B. between 52 to 60 bottles of Pepsi C. between 54 to 60 bottles of Pepsi D. between 56 to 60 bottles of Pepsi
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. There are two goods, X and Y. There is a TOTAL of 8 units of X and a TOTAL of 8 units of Y. The consumers' utility functions are given by: UA(X,Y) = 2X + Y UB(X,Y) = X*Y2 Which of the following allocations is Pareto Efficient? None of the other answers are Pareto Efficient. Consumer A gets 3 units of X and 8 units of Y, and Consumer B gets 5 units of X and O units of Y. Consumer A gets 4 units of X and 4 units of Y, and Consumer B gets 4 units of X and 4 units of Y. Consumer A gets 1 units of X and 4 units of Y, and Consumer B gets 7 units of X and 4 units of Y. Consumer A gets 8 units of X and 8 units of Y, and Consumer B gets 0 units of X and O units of Y.
Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in her possession some slices of ham (H) and cheese (C). Smith prefers to consume ham and cheese in the fixed proportion of 2 slices of cheese to each slice of ham. Her utility function is given by Us = min(10H, 5C). Jones, on the other hand, regards ham and cheese as substitutes – she is always willing to trade 3 slices of ham for 4 slices of cheese, and her utility function is given by UJ = 4H + 3C. Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth Box diagram for all possible exchanges in this situation. What is the contract curve for this exchange economy? b. Suppose Smith’s initial endowment is 40 slices of ham and 80 slices of cheese (Jones has the remaining ham and cheese as her initial endowment). What mutually beneficial trades are possible in this economy and what utility levels will Smith and Jones enjoy from such trades? c. Now imagine a new endowment in which Smith has 60 slices…
7) Jane has 3 liters of soft drinks and 9 sandwiches. Bob, on the other hand, has 8 liters of soft drinks and 4 sandwiches. With these endowments, Jane's marginal rate of substitution ( MRS) of soft drinks for sandwiches is 4 and Bob's MRS is equal to 2. Draw an Edgeworth box diagram to show whether this allocation of resources is efficient. If it is, explain why. If it is not, what exchanges will make both parties better off?
3. Anita (A), Ben (B) and Carlos (C) are housemates who have moved to a new house and must decide how to allocate rooms X, Y and Z. An 'allocation' is where each housemate is assigned to exactly one room. For example, Anita → Room Z, Ben → Room X and Carlos → Room Y is allocation (Z, X, Y). Utilities for each room are given below: Utility for A Utility for B Utility for C Room X 7 9 2 Room Y 4 3 7 Room Z 2 1 4 (a) How many possible allocations are there in total? (b) Identify the two allocations which are not Pareto optimal and explain why they are not Pareto optimal. (Hint: is the allocation (Y,Z,X) Pareto optimal?) (c) Suppose we square Carlos' utility from each room (i.e. uc (Z) becomes 16). Would the set of Pareto optimal outcomes change? Why/why not? (d) Returning to the utilities from part (a), which of the Pareto optimal allocations maximise total surplus (utility) and would all housemates weakly prefer this allocation over any other? (e) Suppose the housemates decide to…
Remy and Emile consume only cheese (x,) and strawberries (x2). Remy's preferences are described by UR = min{xf, 2x5}while Emile's preferences are described by UE = xf + x5 . Remy has 8 pieces of cheese and 1 pint of strawberries while Emile has 4 pieces of cheese and 3 pints of strawberries. (a) Draw an Edgeworth box with x, on the horizontal axis and x, on the vertical axis. Position Remy on the bottom left corner and Emile on the top right corner. Indicate the total number of units of x, and x2. Label the endowment allocation. Show Remy's and Emile's indifference curves. (b) Derive the equation of the contract curve. In your graph in (a), draw the contract curve. (c) Set x1 as the numeraire, i.e., assume p, = 1 and p2 = p. Find the competitive equilibrium. Hint: For Emile to consume at a Paretoefficient allocation, what should the prices be? (d) Redraw the Edgeworth box. Indicate the equilibrium allocation, e. Draw the equilibrium budget line.
5. Carol and Bob both consume the same goods in an economy of pure exchange. Carol is initially endowed with 9 units of good 1 and 6 units of good 2. Bob is initially endowed with 18 units of good 1 and 3 units of good 2. They both have the utility function U(x₁, x₂) = 1/3 x1³x2³. If we set good 1 as the numeraire (so that p₁ = $1), what will the equilibrium price of good 2 be?
10. Consumer A and B have each been given an allocation of 2 goods x and y (assume each has positive amounts of both goods). At this allocation, consumer A has an MRS of 2, while consumer B has an MRS of 1/2. Could this allocation be Pareto efficient? Explain why or why not.